Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 218, Issue 3, 30 August 2014, Pages 341-347
Psychiatry Research

Investigation of the role of the jumping-to-conclusions bias for short-term functional outcome in schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.040Get rights and content

Abstract

Symptom severity and neuropsychological deficits negatively influence functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Recent research implicates specific types of biased thinking styles (e.g. jumping-to-conclusions) in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. This is the first study to test the impact of jumping-to-conclusions on functional outcome in schizophrenia. The aim of the study was to investigate the association of psychopathology, neuropsychology and JTC with subjective quality of life, vocational outcome and housing status in schizophrenia. Analyses were carried out both cross-sectionally at baseline, and longitudinally over the course of symptomatic improvement in the immediate aftermath of a psychotic exacerbation. Seventy-nine patients with schizophrenia were included in the study. Data concerning the variables of interest were collected at baseline, after one month, and after six months. Positive symptomatology was the most significant predictor of subjective and vocational outcome and changes across time. Verbal memory deficits were associated with functional status cross-sectionally, whereas general cognitive capacity significantly predicted functional changes over time. Improvement of the jumping-to-conclusions bias positively affected vocational outcome. Though limited, the observed effect of this bias on real-world functioning highlights the possible usefulness of interventions aimed at improving (meta)cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a severe disorder compromising multiple aspects of everyday functioning and well-being, such as independent living, interpersonal relations and vocational functioning (Green et al., 2004, Couture et al., 2006, Fett et al., 2011). These impairments often persist even after successful pharmacological treatment of psychotic symptoms (Hofer et al., 2006, Leifker et al., 2009). In light of low recovery rates in the disorder (Jaaskelainen et al., 2013), a growing body of research is devoted to understanding the factors associated with functional disability in schizophrenia, in the hope of developing interventions to improve functional recovery and quality of life (Andreasen et al., 2005, Green, 2007, Harvey and Penn, 2010, McDowd et al., 2011).

Several factors have been identified that affect various dimensions of functional outcome and quality of life in schizophrenia. These include premorbid functioning (Hofer et al., 2006), neuropsychological deficits (Green, 1996, Green, 2006), deficits in social cognition (Fett et al., 2011), and severity of psychopathology (Addington and Addington, 1993, Hofer et al., 2006, Ventura et al., 2009). However, the relative importance of these factors is not clear yet (McDowd et al., 2011), possibly depending on the specific patient sample characteristics and functional outcome measures implemented, which differ across various dimensions (e.g. self-report vs. observer-rated).

While the impact of neurocognitive deficits on outcome has been in the spotlight of a large body of research, to the best of our knowledge no study examined whether cognitive biases moderate outcome. Cognitive biases are distortions in the acquisition, processing and interpretation of information, and are implicated in the formation and/or maintenance of delusions (Garety and Freeman, 1999, Moritz et al., 2004, Bell et al., 2006, van der Gaag, 2006). The first one of these biases to be observed, and the best one studied so far, is the jumping-to-conclusions bias, i.e. the tendency of patients to arrive at a conclusion based on limited evidence. It is thought to constitute a trait characteristic of schizophrenia (Peters and Garety, 2006, So et al., 2012), but might also be amenable to specific metacognitive interventions (Moritz et al., 2011, Moritz et al., 2013, Ross et al., 2011, Waller et al., 2011). More importantly, there is some evidence that the latter interventions can lead to improvement of positive symptoms (Aghotor et al., 2008, Moritz et al., 2011, Favrod et al., 2014, Moritz et al., 2013) as well as quality of life (Moritz et al., 2011) in patients with schizophrenia, rendering the jumping-to-conclusions bias especially interesting for research into the outcome of the disorder. So far, the impact of the jumping-to-conclusions bias on the functional outcome and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia has not been investigated. It is possible that the positive effects of metacognitive interventions on quality of life are simply a by-product of symptom improvement, but this does not necessarily have to be the case: Hasty decision-making may foster problems in work and social contexts, since ignoring important evidence and cues might result in serious misjudgements. This effect might be more pronounced in individuals who lack awareness for their cognitive biases, such as patients with schizophrenia (Freeman et al., 2006). Thus, it is conceivable that jumping-to-conclusions has also an independent effect on functioning, over and beyond its association with symptoms.

The present study aimed to assess the relative contribution of the jumping-to-conclusions bias and other well-established factors, including psychopathology and neuropsychological deficits, to subjective and vocational outcomes after an acute psychotic exacerbation in patients with schizophrenia. One important methodological consideration was that most existing studies have either investigated correlates of functional outcome cross-sectionally (e.g. Addington and Addington, 1999, Dickerson et al., 1999b, Dickinson and Coursey, 2002, Hofer et al., 2006, Brekke et al., 2007, Lipkovich et al., 2009), or used baseline scores of the investigated variables to predict future outcomes (e.g. Dickerson et al., 1999a, Norman et al., 1999, Addington and Addington, 2000, Suslow et al., 2000, Velligan et al., 2000, Kurtz et al., 2005, Brekke et al., 2007, Lipkovich et al., 2009) – for extensive reviews on the subject, see (Green et al., 2004, Ventura et al., 2009). However, a question that might have significant implications in terms of shaping treatment priorities is how changes of predictor variables in the course of treatment dynamically affect changes in psychosocial functioning and quality of life. To our knowledge, only one study (Mohamed et al., 2008) has dealt with this question so far by assessing the effects of symptoms and neuropsychological deficits on quality of life over the course of treatment.

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relative contribution of clinical and neuropsychological deficits, but also of jumping-to-conclusions and Theory-of-Mind, to subjective quality of life as well as vocational outcome and living status, both cross-sectionally at baseline, as well as longitudinally over the course of symptomatic improvement. As delineated above, we had reason to expect that jumping-to-conclusions might be associated with functional outcome and/or quality of life. However, we refrained from specific hypotheses regarding the exact nature of this contribution. Given that the jumping-to-conclusions bias is associated with symptoms, and has also recently been linked to working memory deficits (Garety et al., 2013), it was not possible to predict whether this cognitive bias would have a unique, independent effect on the outcome variables.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder undergoing an acute psychotic exacerbation. Patients were selected among participants of a randomized controlled trial of two non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatments in patients with psychotic disorders – a metacognitive intervention addressing cognitive biases, and cognitive remediation training focusing on more elementary neuropsychological functions such as attention and memory (

Results

Results of the cross-sectional analyses are presented on Table 3. PANSS positive scores were a significant predictor of most WHOQOL-Bref domains with the exception of “environment”, for which disorganization scores were a significant predictor. Verbal memory scores were a significant predictor for overall health satisfaction and the WHOQOL domains “physical health” and “environment”. Gender also emerged as a significant predictor for overall quality of life and health satisfaction, with female

Discussion

The present study investigated predictors of subjective and vocational outcome in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In the cross-sectional analyses, positive and disorganization symptoms and verbal memory were the most significant correlates of subjective outcome, whereas none of the examined variables was significantly associated with vocational outcome or living status. On the other hand, the course of subjective quality of

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Clinical Trial Program of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Mo 969/6-1).

References (83)

  • D. Freeman et al.

    Delusions and decision-making style: use of the Need for Closure Scale

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2006)
  • P. Garety et al.

    Neuropsychological functioning and jumping to conclusions in delusions

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2013)
  • M.F. Green et al.

    Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2004)
  • A. Hofer et al.

    Patient outcomes in schizophrenia I: correlates with sociodemographic variables, psychopathology, and side effects

    European Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • E.A. Holthausen et al.

    Predictive value of cognition for different domains of outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia

    Psychiatry Research

    (2007)
  • J.D. Huppert et al.

    Quality of life in schizophrenia: contributions of anxiety and depression

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2001)
  • F.R. Leifker et al.

    Determinants of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia: the influences of cognitive impairment, functional capacity, and symptoms

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2009)
  • J. McDowd et al.

    The association between verbal memory, processing speed, negative symptoms and functional capacity in schizophrenia

    Psychiatry Research

    (2011)
  • M. Menon et al.

    ׳Jumping to conclusions׳ and delusions in psychosis: relationship and response to treatment

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2008)
  • S. Moritz et al.

    Further evidence for the efficacy of a metacognitive group training in schizophrenia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2011)
  • S. Moritz et al.

    Complementary group Metacognitive Training (MCT) reduces delusional ideation in schizophrenia

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2013)
  • E. Peters et al.

    Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2006)
  • T.E. Smith et al.

    Recovery from psychosis in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: symptoms and neurocognitive rate-limiters for the development of social behavior skills

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2002)
  • R. Tabares-Seisdedos et al.

    Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder at one-year follow-up

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2008)
  • M. van der Gaag et al.

    The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale II: a ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2006)
  • J. Ventura et al.

    Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2009)
  • H. Waller et al.

    Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: a pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent, high conviction delusions

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • J. Addington et al.

    Premorbid functioning, cognitive functioning, symptoms and outcome in schizophrenia

    Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

    (1993)
  • J. Addington et al.

    Neurocognitive and social functioning in schizophrenia

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (1999)
  • J. Aghotor et al.

    Metacognitive training for patients with schizophrenia (MCT): feasibility and preliminary evidence for its efficacy

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • N.C. Andreasen et al.

    Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • C. Andreou et al.

    Dopaminergic modulation of probabilistic reasoning and overconfidence in errors: a double-blind study

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2014)
  • S. Baron-Cohen et al.

    The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes“ Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • C.R. Bowie et al.

    Prediction of real-world functional disability in chronic mental disorders: a comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • C.R. Bowie et al.

    Determinants of real-world functional performance in schizophrenia subjects: correlations with cognition, functional capacity, and symptoms

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • J.S. Brekke et al.

    How neurocognition and social cognition influence functional change during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2007)
  • S.M. Couture et al.

    The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2006)
  • F.B. Dickerson et al.

    Predictors of residential independence among outpatients with schizophrenia

    Psychiatric Services

    (1999)
  • D. Dickinson et al.

    Systemic hypotheses for generalized cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a new take on an old problem

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2009)
  • J. Favrod et al.

    Sustained antipsychotic effect of metacognitive training in psychosis: a randomized-controlled study

    European Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • P.A. Garety et al.

    Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text