Psychopathy: A Clinical and Forensic Overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Assessment

Because of space limitations, this article focuses on the most widely accepted measure of psychopathy, the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R) [25], [26]. Occasional references also are made to its direct derivatives, the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV), the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL: YV), and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD), each supported by extensive evidence for their reliability and validity [27], [28], [29].

Validity

Evidence for the validity of the PCL-R and the construct it measures is extensive (see Refs. [22], [23], [26]) and comes from research examining relationships to various other instruments and scales; associations with behavioral data, such as recidivism and violence; and basic laboratory research involving information processing, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electrocortical activity, and biochemical correlates. This research is discussed in detail elsewhere (see Refs. [15], [16], [22]

Psychopathy and Crime

In the past few years there has been a dramatic change in the perceived and actual role played by psychopathy in the criminal justice system. Formerly, a prevailing view was that clinical diagnoses such as psychopathy were of little value in understanding and predicting criminal behaviors. However, many of the characteristics important for inhibiting antisocial and violent behavior—empathy, close emotional bonds, fear of punishment, and guilt—are lacking or seriously deficient in psychopaths.

Treatment

Unlike most other offenders, psychopaths suffer little personal distress, see little wrong with their attitudes and behavior, and seek treatment only when it is in their best interests to do so, such as when seeking probation or parole. They derive little benefit from traditional prison programs, particularly those aimed at the development of empathy, conscience, and interpersonal skills (see Refs. [17], [100], [101]). Indeed, there have been reports that some programs designed to modify the

Some Cautions

Although the research evidence for the reliability and validity of the PCL-R and its derivatives is extensive, this does not ensure that an individual assessment will be reliable or valid. In a research context, misuse of these instruments will have few negative consequences for the individual. However, when the scores are used in clinical and criminal justice contexts, the implications of misuse are potentially serious, especially if the scores are used to guide treatment or adjudication

Summary

There is a substantial amount of empirical evidence that psychopathy, as measured by the PCL-R and its derivatives, is a predictor of recidivism and violence in prison, forensic psychiatric, and civil psychiatric populations. The PCL-R is one of the most generalizable of the risk factors identified thus far, and for this reason it is included in various actuarial and structured clinical risk assessment procedures. Although psychopathy is not the only risk factor for recidivism and violence, it

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (112)

  • D.J. Cooke et al.

    Searching for the pan-cultural core of psychopathic personality disorder

    Pers Individ Dif

    (2005)
  • G.E. Berrios

    The history of mental symptoms: descriptive psychopathology since the nineteenth century

    (1996)
  • H. Cleckley

    The mask of sanity

    (1976)
  • Hervé H. Psychopathy across the ages. In: Hervé H, Yuille J, editors. The psychopath: theory, research, and practice....
  • T. Millon et al.

    Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal, and violent behaviors

    (1998)
  • R.D. Hare

    Psychopathy: a construct whose time has come

    Crim Justice Behav

    (1996)
  • J. Monahan

    [Comments on cover jacket]

  • D.M. Blonigen et al.

    Psychopathic personality traits: heritability and genetic overlap with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology

    Psychol Med

    (2005)
  • Larsson H, Andershed H, Lichtenstein P. A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic...
  • I.D. Waldman et al.

    Genetic and environmental influences on psychopathy and antisocial behavior

  • E. Viding et al.

    Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • A.W. MacDonald et al.

    Toward an integrated perspective on the etiology on psychopathy

  • P.J. Frick et al.

    Psychopathy and developmental pathways to antisocial behavior in youth

  • D.R. Lynam

    Early identification of chronic offenders: who is the fledgling psychopath?

    Psychol Bull

    (1996)
  • R.J.R. Blair

    Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy

    Dev Psychopathol

    (2005)
  • R.J.R. Blair et al.

    The psychopath: emotion and the brain

    (2005)
  • Kiehl KA. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on psychopathy: evidence for paralimbic system dysfunction. Psychiatry...
  • G.T. Harris et al.

    The treatment of psychopaths

  • J. Hicklin et al.

    Similarities and differences among antisocial and psychopathic self-report inventories from the perspective of general personality functioning

    European Journal of Personality

    (2005)
  • P. Babiak et al.

    Snakes in suits: when psychopaths go to work

    (2006)
  • R.D. Hare

    Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us

    (1998)
  • E. Silver et al.

    Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: toward an ecological approach

    Law Hum Behav

    (1999)
  • Hervé H, Yuille J, editors. The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum, in...
  • R.D. Hare

    The Hare psychopathy checklist—revised

    (1991)
  • R.D. Hare

    The Hare psychopathy checklist—revised

    (2003)
  • S.D. Hart et al.

    The Hare psychopathy checklist: screening version

    (1995)
  • A.E. Forth et al.

    The Hare psychopathy checklist: youth version

    (2003)
  • P.J. Frick et al.

    The antisocial process screening device

    (2001)
  • R.D. Hare et al.

    The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: development, structural properties, and new directions

  • S. Fulero

    Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised

  • Acheson SK. Review of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. 2nd edition. In: Spies RA, Plake BS, editors. The sixteenth...
  • Bolt DM. Analyzing the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R) using item response theory and factor analysis: overview...
  • D. Bolt et al.

    Multigroup IRT analyses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R)

    Psychol Assess

    (2004)
  • R.D. Hare et al.

    Structural models of psychopathy

    Curr Psychiatry Rep

    (2005)
  • Neumann CS, Kosson DS, Salekin RT. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the psychopathy construct:...
  • J.F. Edens et al.

    Psychopathic, not psychopath: taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2006)
  • J.P. Guay et al.

    The latent structure of psychopathy: when more is simply more

    (2004)
  • D.J. Cooke et al.

    Psychopathy and ethnicity: structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants

    Psychol Assess

    (2001)
  • J.L. Skeem et al.

    Are there ethnic differences in levels of psychopathy? A meta-analysis

    Law Hum Behav

    (2004)
  • D.J. Cooke et al.

    An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised

    Psychol Assess

    (1997)
  • C.S. Neumann et al.

    Reconstruing the reconstruction of psychopathy. A comment on Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clarke

    J Personal Disord

    (2005)
  • Neumann CS, Hare RD, Newman JP. The superordinate nature of psychopathy. J Personal Disord, in...
  • E.A. Sullivan et al.

    Ethnic and cultural variations in psychopathy

  • H.J. Steadman et al.

    A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools

    Law Hum Behav

    (1999)
  • D.J. Cooke et al.

    Evaluation of the screening version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL: SV): an item response theory analysis

    Psychol Assess

    (1999)
  • C. Hill et al.

    Confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV) in offenders with axis I disorders

    Psychol Assess

    (2004)
  • M.J. Vitacco et al.

    Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (2005)
  • Neumann CS, Kosson DS, Forth AE, et al. Factor structure of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version in...
  • Cited by (199)

    • The dark triad and investment behavior

      2021, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article draws on several more extensive discussions of the topics contained in references [26], [30], [35], [63], [111], [112].

    View full text