Elsevier

Physiotherapy

Volume 101, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages 25-33
Physiotherapy

Systematic review
The impact of cortical remapping interventions on pain and disability in chronic low back pain: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Cortical change, in the manner of cortical remapping is a common feature of and potential driver for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Novel interventions such as graded motor imagery (GMI) and mirror visual feedback (MVF) have been shown to facilitate correction of cortical changes and improve symptoms in other chronic pain states. However, little is known regarding the effectiveness of these treatment approaches in CLBP.

Objective

To identify and assess the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions which target cortical remapping in the management of CLBP.

Data sources

The electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, OVID, PEDro, BNI, PsycINFO, HMIC, and Cochrane library were systematically searched.

Study selection

Of 11 potential citations identified, 5 articles were identified for inclusion and critiqued. These comprised 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 randomised cross-over study, and 1 multiple case study design.

Results

Visualisation of lumbar movement may significantly improve movement-related pain severity and duration. A combined sensorimotor retraining approach has been shown to produce short-term improvements in both pain and disability outcomes in CLBP. The relative effectiveness of individual interventions and their long-term efficacy have yet to be established.

Conclusions

There is a paucity of robust literature which has examined the application and efficacy of these novel treatments in the management of CLBP. Results from the few CLBP studies which are available are encouraging. Further, robust research is needed to optimise treatment protocols and establish their long-term effectiveness in CLBP.

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) constitutes a major public health problem in Westernised societies. Recent research has shown that the total healthcare costs of CLBP patients is approximately double those of matched controls [1], and that CLBP is the single greatest cause of global disability [2]. Whilst estimates may vary considerably, there is no doubt that the financial impact of low back pain is significant and growing [3]. The clinical course of LBP is highly variable, with 3 to 10% of patients known to develop chronicity [4], defined as LBP which persists for 3 months or more [5]. Many CLBP management strategies have been proposed and trialled (including pharmacological, interventional, and surgical approaches), but have at best achieved moderate success [6]. It can be argued that to date healthcare strategies have focused too extensively on ‘structural correction’ [7], and that traditional manual therapies have, until relatively recently, been too impairment-orientated [4], [7].

Cortical remapping (CR), defined as neuronal reorganisation within the higher centres of the brain, secondary to cortical neuroplasticity, is a common feature of many chronic pain states [8] and has more recently been documented in CLBP [7]. Extensive CR has been identified in areas known to be involved in pain processing (‘the pain neuromatrix’) [9], somatosensation [10] and motor planning [11]. Brain imaging studies in CLBP patients have demonstrated significant changes in neurochemical profile [12], neuroanatomy [13], [14], cortical representation [10], and cortical responsiveness [15], with the magnitude of change seen to be proportional to symptom chronicity and the level of associated depression or anxiety [12], [15]. Whether these changes are cause or effect in CLBP has yet to be established, however, there is growing opinion that maladaptive neuroplastic changes within the central nervous system may play an important role in symptom generation and perpetuation in CLBP [7].

Several treatments have evolved which specifically target normalisation of cortical remapping. These include mirror-box or mirror visual feedback (MVF) therapies [16], graded motor imagery (GMI) [17], and sensory discrimination retraining (SDR) [18]. MVF and GMI both involve progression through a graded motor recruitment programme, whilst visual feedback of the unaffected, contralateral limb or body part is provided using mirrors [16]. Participants begin with basic motor imagery, such as recognition of limb laterality and imagined movements, and progress to more complex motor functions as symptoms allow. SDR targets an improvement in sensory acuity using various techniques such as two-point discrimination (TPD) or/and character recognition (Graphesthesia) [19]. All have been applied in the management of other chronic pain states including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and phantom limb pain (PLP) with varying degrees of success [19], [20], [21].

Since there is growing evidence regarding the importance of cortical remapping in CLBP [7], [8], [10], it is reasonable to consider these treatment approaches in the management of this condition. However, the strength of evidence regarding their effectiveness in this patient population is unclear at this time. Two single case studies [22], [23] have reported encouraging results using cortical remapping techniques and emphasise the need for further, high quality research in this area. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of treatment modalities which specifically target cortical reorganisation in the management of CLBP.

Section snippets

Data sources and search

A comprehensive online search was performed using Medline/Pubmed, OVID, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsychInfo, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), British Nursing Index (BNI), Cochrane Library, and Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC). The OVID platform was used to search AMED, EMBASE, HMIC, Medline, and PsycInfo, EBSCO for CINAHL, and ProQuest for BNI. Search strategies were developed

Study selection

Initial electronic database searches identified 10 potentially relevant publications, with the addition of an 11th via manual bibliography screening. Three were subsequently eliminated following screening of abstracts, and a further 3 on screening of full text articles, leaving 5 for inclusion in this review. The appropriateness of final article selection was corroborated by a second, independent assessor (SP). Fig. 2 depicts a flow-diagram summarising the screening process used to select

Summary of evidence

The findings of this review suggest that interventions which target cortical remapping (such as GMI, MVF, and SDR) have potential for application in the management of CLBP. Real-time lumbar visualisation using mirrors may significantly reduce the severity and duration of movement-associated low back pain [31], which correlates with previous findings in other chronic pain states such as CRPS [16]. There is evidence that motor control interventions can significantly influence M1 cortical

Clinical implications

The limited research that we have been able to identify which has examined the efficacy of these developing treatment approaches in CLBP is promising, particularly when taken in the context of the more extensive research findings in CRPS and PLP. The use of real-time visualisation of the spine using mirrors may facilitate significant short-term improvements in pain and disability in CLBP patients [31], but further longitudinal studies are required to establish the durability of these changes.

Limitations of this review

Despite a comprehensive and systematic search strategy, only a very small number of articles were eligible for inclusion in this review. It is possible that limiting our search parameters to publications where English translations were available may have contributed to this. Another contributing factor to consider here is potential publication bias, where studies with negative results are less likely to be published [35]. The methodological quality of the 5 studies which were included was

Conclusions

The management of CLBP remains a considerable challenge to researchers and clinicians alike. There is substantial evidence regarding the important role of maladaptive cortical remapping in symptom generation and perpetuation in many chronic pain states including CLBP. Management strategies such as sensory discrimination retraining, graded motor imagery, and mirror visual feedback which specifically aim to drive adaptive cortical neuroplasticity to redress these changes have been shown to be

References (35)

  • D. Hoy et al.

    The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2014)
  • M. Gore et al.

    The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical co-morbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings

    Spine

    (2012)
  • B. Koes et al.

    An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care

    Eur Spine J

    (2010)
  • C. Cedrasch et al.

    Is chronic non-specific low back pain chronic? Definitions of a problem and problems with a definition

    Br J Gen Pract

    (1999)
  • B. Morlion

    Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies

    Nat Rev Neurol

    (2013)
  • M.N. Baliki et al.

    Brain morphological signatures for chronic pain

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • H. Tsao et al.

    Reorganization of the motor cortex is associated with postural control deficits in recurrent low back pain

    Brain

    (2008)
  • Cited by (32)

    • The sensorimotor theory of pathological pain revisited

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      A greater availability of sensory information (e.g. visual information) will increase the precision of sensorimotor processing, and allow more reliable sources of information to be given priority (Kording and Wolpert, 2004). For people with low back pain (Diers et al., 2016, 2013; Wand et al., 2012), and neck pain (Beinert et al., 2019) visual feedback during a movement can reduce pain (for reviews see Daffada et al., 2015; Heinrich et al., 2019). Virtual feedback reduced pain in people with spinal cord injury (for review see Roosink and Mercier, 2014).

    • Clinical evaluation of somatosensory integrity in people with chronic shoulder pain

      2021, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies have also demonstrated decreased tactile acuity in people with chronic pain such as arthritis, complex regional pain syndrome, and chronic low back pain (Moseley, 2008). Tactile acuity and body schema training have been included as part of the treatment for chronic low back (Daffadaet al., 2015) and phantom limb pain (Moseley and Flor, 2012), and complex regional pain syndrome (Moseley, 2008), showing evidence of reduced pain and improved function. A recent study found similar results for chronic shoulder pain, including decreased pain intensity, fear of movement, catastrophic thoughts, and improved shoulder flexion (Quintanillaet al., 2020).

    • Effects of additional action observation to an exercise program in patients with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis: A randomized-controlled trial

      2021, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      These methods indicate the potential effects of motor imagery and visual feedback on cortical representations in chronic pain. Action observation therapy (AOT) is a kind of movement representation technique (Thieme et al., 2016) that can be served as an effective method to promote neuroplastic changes caused by chronic pain (Daffada et al., 2015). This technique has been applied to enhance specific motor skills, to facilitate motor learning and to decrease pain severity of the extremity.

    • Making sense of pain in sports physiotherapy

      2021, A Comprehensive Guide to Sports Physiology and Injury Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text