Review‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ in eating and food reward: Brain mechanisms and clinical implications
Introduction
Several decades of neuroscience studies have advanced understanding of how the brain generates behavior related to food reward, motivation, and hunger. A fundamental question that remains is how mesocorticolimbic and hypothalamic circuitry interact to produce reward and the motivation to eat [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].
Work in our lab has focused on understanding how mesocorticolimbic systems generate ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ for food rewards, which have turned out to be somewhat separable. Here we describe how various brain mechanisms produce those two components of food reward. ‘Wanting’ and ‘liking’ usually cohere together, but also can dissociate in particular brain conditions to come apart. Findings have revealed a distributed network of brain hedonic ‘hotspots’ that can amplify hedonic impact or ‘liking’ for food rewards. These ‘liking’ mechanisms differ from larger mesocorticolimbic circuitry that generates incentive salience or ‘wanting’ as motivation to eat. We focus on mechanisms for ‘liking’ and for ‘wanting’, and how these interact with homeostatic hypothalamic circuitry in controlling eating and food reward.
The words liking and wanting are often used interchangeably in ordinary life when talking about rewards. For example, people may want a palatable piece of chocolate because they like the flavor and other sensations of consuming it. In ordinary use, liking means conscious pleasure and wanting means conscious desire, which typically involve cognitive appraisals and declarative goals mediated by cortically-weighted circuitry. But here we use quotations for ‘wanting’ and ‘liking in order to distinguish specific psychological processes from ordinary use [8]. ‘Wanting’ here refers to the particular psychological process of incentive salience, which can occur either consciously or unconsciously, generated by brain mesolimbic circuitry in the form of cue-triggered motivation. When rewards such as palatable foods and their predictive cues are imbued with incentive salience by mesocorticolimbic circuitry, those cues and foods become attractive, and in conscious form able to elicit subjective cravings. Whether conscious or not, incentive salience triggered by cues can also generate behavioral urges to seek and consume their associated rewards [9,10]. In the laboratory, ‘wanting’ is typically measured in humans by subjective craving ratings, and in animals by how much food is pursued, consumed, or preferred over an alternative. ‘Liking’ refers to the hedonic impact of pleasant rewards, which when surfaced into consciousness can result subjective pleasure ratings in adult humans, but which in animals and infant humans can be assessed via objective measures of hedonic orofacial expressions elicited to taste in the affective taste reactivity test [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ can become separated in some conditions, as discussed below.
The hedonic taste reactivity task measures affective orofacial reactions to tastes of sucrose, quinine, water, etc., and the reactions to any given taste can also be shifted by a variety of relevant physiological, learning, and brain manipulation factors that alter its palatability. Originally pioneered by Steiner for use in human infants [11], the test was adapted for rodents by Grill and Norgren [13]. Orofacial responses to taste are grouped into positive, neutral, and aversive categories. Positive hedonic or ‘liking’ evaluations (Fig. 1a) are reflected in tongue protrusions, paw licks, and lateral tongue protrusions, typically elicited by tastes such as sucrose. By comparison, negative aversive or ‘disgust’ evaluations are reflected by gapes, forelimb, flails, headshakes, paw treading and face washes, and typically elicited by bitter quinine. Many of these orofacial expressions to taste are homologous, or evolutionarily conserved, across mammalian species ranging from human infants to non-human primates, rodents, and horses [14], [15], [16]. In our laboratory, rodents are implanted with bilateral oral cannula, which allow taste solutions to be directly infused into their mouths without them having to engage in any appetitive activity to obtain them, and allowing experimenter control of stimulus intensity and duration. Independence from appetitive or instrumental decisions to consume is important in allowing taste reactivity to provide a relatively pure measure of taste-elicited ‘liking’, without being altered by changes in ‘wanting’ that can influence most other behavioral measures of food reward [15,17].
Tastants with very different sensory properties like sucrose, saccharin, salt, and fats can all evoke similar positive ‘liking’ responses, indicating that hedonic reactions are palatability-specific rather than sensory-specific [14], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Accordingly, taste reactivity behaviors are not simple inflexible reflexes to a particular sensation, but rather reflect a hedonic evaluation that also depends on the internal state of the organism, including physiological appetite and satiety states, neurobiological states, as well as learned associations carried from previous experiences with the taste. Physiological states like hunger and satiety can shift subjective ratings of palatability for a particular taste in humans, in a phenomenon known as alliesthesia [22], [23], [24]. In rodents too, caloric hunger magnifies hedonic ‘liking’ reactions to palatable sweet taste, whereas satiety conversely reduces ‘liking’ [25,26]. Similarly, salt appetite modulates the hedonic impact of the intense saltiness taste of concentrated NaCl. For example, hypertonic concentrations of salt are normally aversive, in the sense that rats mostly display ‘disgust’ reactions when a seawater concentration of NaCl is placed into their mouths. However, when a hormonal state of sodium deficiency or salt depletion is induced, orofacial reactivity to the same intensely salty taste shifts to mostly positive ‘liking’ [20,[27], [28], [29], [30], [31]]. Conversely, modulation by learned associations can be induced by pairing a novel ‘liked’ sweet taste of saccharin as a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS+) with an injection of lithium chloride, which induces malaise, as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), to produce a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) so that subsequent exposures to saccharin taste instead elicit negative gapes and related ‘disgust’ reactions [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37].
Our laboratory has studied brain generators of taste ‘liking’ by combining central neural manipulations of hedonic circuitry with the taste reactivity measure of ‘liking’ versus ‘disgust’. In brief, pharmacological microinjections, excitotoxin lesions, optogenetic brain stimulation or inhibitions, etc. are used to systematically turn on or turn off particular neural systems in various brain locations during the taste reactivity test. This is coupled with an analysis of local Fos protein expression that allows us to more directly determine the spread of neuronal changes induced by a manipulation that alters ‘liking’, to identify localization of function, and map subregional localization of hedonic mechanisms within a brain structure. These studies have revealed a distributed network of limbic hotspots or small sites within subregions of cortical and subcortical structures in the rat that are capable of amplifying the hedonic impact (Fig. 1b) of sucrose taste [19,[38], [39], [40]]. Brain hedonic hotspots appear to be restricted to particular subregions of limbic structures such as rostrodorsal quadrant of medial shell of nucleus accumbens (NAc), caudolateral half of ventral pallidum (VP), a rostromedial portion orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a far posterior zone of insula cortex (IC), and the parabrachial nucleus of the brainstem pons (PBN). Brain hedonic hotspots that generate ‘liking’ are embedded within larger mesocorticolimbic circuitry (spanning several entire structures) that is capable of generating incentive salience ‘wanting’, underlying the close interconnection between ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ functions in reward [38,[41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48]]. In the following sections we discuss roles of these hedonic hotspots and mesocorticolimbic motivation circuitry in food reward, describe recent findings, and consider their potential roles in normal appetite and in clinical eating disorders and obesity.
Section snippets
Hindbrain structures compute early hedonic evaluations
Rudimentary hedonic processing of tastes begins to occur in the brainstem early in pathway of ascending gustatory signals [11,[49], [50], [51], [52]]. For example, brainstem (4th-ventricle) microinjections of a benzodiazepine drug that promotes GABA signaling enhanced positive ‘liking’ reactions to sweet taste, as did microinjections limited to the parabrachial nucleus of the pons, revealing that site as a brainstem hedonic hotspot [53,54]. Brainstem capacity for early hedonic-related
The nucleus accumbens medial shell- hotspot for hedonic enhancement
Several decades of research have implicated the nucleus accumbens (NAc) as especially important in food motivation, and the NAc also plays important roles in controlling ‘liking’ reactions. Relevant to ‘wanting’, opioid, dopamine, and GABA/glutamate drug microinjections in the nucleus accumbens, especially in medial shell, can robustly enhance motivation to pursue and eat palatable foods [19,[68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]]. Importantly
Ventral pallidum hedonic hotspot
The ventral pallidum receives the densest output projections from nucleus accumbens [132,133,155,156], and ventral pallidum is important in both reward and aversion [29,38,[157], [158], [159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173], [174]]. The posterior half of the ventral pallidum of rats contains another 0.8 mm3 hedonic hotspot where microinjections of the mu-opioid agonist DAMGO more than doubles hedonic ‘liking’ reactions to sucrose
Cortical hedonic hotspots – insula and orbitofrontal cortex
Beyond subcortical hedonic hotspots, two hotspots in cortex were recently discovered by our lab: one in the anteromedial orbitofrontal cortex, and another in the far-posterior insula cortex of rats. Both of these cortical hedonic hotspots similarly caused hedonic gains of function in sucrose ‘liking’ reactions in response to drug microinjections that deliver mu opioid stimulation or orexin stimulation to local neurons [39]. By contrast, the same opioid/orexin microinjections in other limbic
Distributed brain mechanisms of ‘wanting’: nucleus accumbens core, neostriatum, amygdala, lateral hypothalamus and beyond
The mesocorticolimbic brain system that generates incentive salience or ‘wanting’ is anatomically larger than the hedonic hotspot network, including entire structures of NAc, central nucleus of amygdala and parts of neostriatum, etc. Neurochemically it includes dopamine and glutamate, as well as opioid orexin, and endocannabinoid transmitters so that its functionally more robust than the ‘liking’ network (Fig. 1b). [222], [223], [224], [225], [226], [227], [228], [229], [230], [231]. This
Clinical implications of ‘liking’ versus ‘wanting’ dissociation: incentive-sensitization and obesity
The above discussion of brain mechanisms for food ‘wanting’ versus ‘liking’ may carry potential implications for human obesity and eating disorders. In the past decade, a number of obesity investigators have applied the brain-based ‘wanting/liking’ distinction to suggest that in some vulnerable individuals, ‘wanting’ for foods might dissociate and exceed ‘liking’ to cause excessive cue-trigged ‘wants’ to overeat [2,4,5,[370], [371], [372], [373], [374]]. The idea that some cases of extreme
Conclusion
Mesocorticolimbic structures including the nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula contain localized hedonic hotspots in specific subregions, where opioid and other specific forms of stimulation can enhance ‘liking’ reactions to palatable foods. The same structures often also contain separable hedonic coldspots where the same neurobiological stimulations suppress ‘liking’. These hotspots and coldspots are nestled within larger mesocorticostriatal ‘wanting’
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgements
The research described here was supported by NIH grants MH63649 from NIMH and DA015188 from NIDA to KCB, and IM was supported by training grant DC00011 from NIDCD. We thank Dr. Stephanie Preston for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We also thank Hannah Baumgartner, Erin Naffziger, David Nguyen, Shayan Abtahi, and Valerie Trewick for their feedback.
References (436)
- et al.
Hungry brains: A meta-analytical review of brain activation imaging studies on food perception and appetite in obese individuals
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2018) - et al.
Pleasure Systems in the Brain
Neuron
(2015) - et al.
The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats
Brain Res.
(1978) - et al.
Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2001) Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: Microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2000)- et al.
Sucrose bobs and quinine gapes: Horse (equus caballus) responses to taste support phylogenetic similarity in taste reactivity
Behav. Brain Res.
(2013) - et al.
Advances in the neurobiological bases for food “liking” versus “wanting,”
Physiol. Behav.
(2014) - et al.
Instant transformation of learned repulsion into motivational “wanting,”
Curr. Biol.
(2013) - et al.
Pleasantness of a sweet taste during hunger and satiety: Effects of gender and “sweet tooth“
Appetite
(1993) Modulation of taste affect by hunger, caloric satiety, and sensory-specific satiety in the rat
Appetite
(1991)
Postingestive alliesthesia: The rat tells the same story
Physiol. Behav.
Conditioning method determines patterns of c-fos expression following novel taste-illness pairing
Behav. Brain Res.
The hedonic impact and intake of food are increased by midazolam microinjection in the parabrachial nucleus
Brain Res.
Enkephalin surges in dorsal neostriatum as a signal to eat
Curr. Biol.
Which cue to “want”? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking
Behav. Brain Res.
Neurological tests and behavioral deficits in chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rats
Brain Res.
The taste reactivity test. II. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rats
Brain Res.
Brainstem mediates diazepam enhancement of palatability and feeding: Microinjections into fourth ventricle versus lateral ventricle
Brain Res.
Liking” and “wanting” food rewards: Brain substrates and roles in eating disorders
Physiol. Behav.
Benzodiazepines, appetite, and taste palatability
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
Food intake after diazepam, morphine or muscimol: microinjections In the nucleus accumbens shell
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Brainstem systems mediate the enhancement of palatability by chlordiazepoxide
Brain Res.
Functions of the anterior insula in taste, autonomic, and related functions
Brain Cogn.
Projections of the parabrachial nucleus in the Old World monkey
Exp. Neurol.
Food deprivation does not potentiate glucose taste reactivity responses of chronic decerebrate rats
Brain Res.
Gastric modulation of gustatory afferent activity
Physiol. Behav.
Enhanced intake of high-fat food following striatal mu-opioid stimulation: Microinjection mapping and Fos expression
Neuroscience
Ipsilateral feeding-specific circuits between the nucleus accumbens shell and the lateral hypothalamus: Regulation by glutamate and GABA receptor subtypes
Neuropharmacology
Feeding induced by blockade of AMPA and kainate receptors within the ventral striatum: A microinfusion mapping study
Behav. Brain Res.
Opioid modulation of taste hedonics within the ventral striatum
Physiol. Behav.
Sensitization and conditioning of feeding following multiple morphine microinjections into the nucleus accumbens
Brain Res.
Specific changes in food intake elicited by blockade or activation of glutamate receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell
Behav. Brain Res.
Organization of the output of the ventral striatopallidal system in the rat: ventral pallidal efferents
Neuroscience
Cell-type-specific afferent innervation of the nucleus accumbens core and shell
Front. Neuroanat.
The ventral basal ganglia, a selection mechanism at the crossroads of space, strategy, and reward
Prog. Neurobiol.
Looking for the role of cannabinoid receptor heteromers in striatal function
Neuropharmacology
Lateral hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral pallidum roles in eating and hunger: interactions between homeostatic and reward circuitry
Front. Syst. Neurosci.
Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain
Psychol. Bull.
Supra-Additive Effects of Combining Fat and Carbohydrate on Food Reward
Cell Metab.
Individual Differences in Cue-Induced Motivation and Striatal Systems in Rats Susceptible to Diet-Induced Obesity
Neuropsychopharmacology
The pleasure of food: underlying brain mechanisms of eating and other pleasures
Flavour
Neural correlates of food addiction
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
Evolving concepts of emotion and motivation
Front. Psychol.
Unconscious emotion
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
Innate human facial expressions to taste and smell stimulation
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
Intake of high-intensity sweeteners alters the ability of sweet taste to signal caloric consequences: implications for the learned control of energy and body weight regulation
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
Hedonic Hot Spot in Nucleus Accumbens Shell: Where Do -Opioids Cause Increased Hedonic Impact of Sweetness?
J. Neurosci.
Liking” and “wanting” of sweet and oily food stimuli as affected by high-fat diet-induced obesity, weight loss, leptin, and genetic predisposition
Am. J. Physiol. - Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.
Physiological role of pleasure
Science (80-.).
Cited by (139)
Altered neural representation of olfactory food reward in the nucleus accumbens after acute stress
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersAn examination of the effects of nucleus accumbens core nociceptin on appetitive and consummatory motivation for food
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchPOMC-specific knockdown of MeCP2 leads to adverse phenotypes in mice chronically exposed to high fat diet
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchClinical and Preclinical Evidence for Gut Microbiome Mechanisms in Substance Use Disorders
2024, Biological Psychiatry