Patient Perspectives and Characteristics
Don’t need help, don’t want help, can’t get help: How patients with brain tumors account for not using rehabilitation, psychosocial and community services

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Patients may downplay or not recognize their issues or problems.

  • Patients may not understand if their issues are ‘normal’ or can be treated.

  • Patients may wish to self-manage or use informal sources of support.

  • Patients’ limitations may themselves act as barriers to accessing services.

Abstract

Objective

To understand why some adults with primary brain tumors do not use support services despite indications of a need for help.

Methods

Nineteen adults recently diagnosed with primary brain tumors participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent ways participants explained their non-use of support services.

Results

Some patients indicated that they did not use support services as they did not need help, in particular reporting positive experiences relative to their expectations or to others, that their needs were met, or difficulties recognizing their needs. Some patients reported not wanting help, citing preferences to self-manage, other priorities, or negative perceptions of the services available. Many patients identified barriers to support service utilization, particularly problems recognizing that services could address their needs and that their needs were valid concerns.

Conclusion

The gap between patients’ needs and their service use may result from patients’ expectations from the medical system, shifting of standards for well-being, cognitive changes, and access issues.

Practice implications

Addressing knowledge barriers and perceptions relating to help-seeking, as well as recognizing the challenges specific to this patient group in terms of need recognition and access issues, may assist in improving patients’ physical, psychological and social well-being.

Introduction

Primary brain tumors are associated with numerous physical, cognitive and neurological impairments, and psychosocial sequelae to the tumor and its treatment [1], [2]. Patients often experience functional, occupational, family and social changes, and high levels of unmet supportive care needs [3], [4], [5]. Clinical guidelines for glioma, the most common primary brain tumor, recommend offering patients multidisciplinary rehabilitation to address any residual deficits during and following treatment [6], [7]. Assessment of patients’ needs and referral to information, support and counseling services, and sources of practical assistance, are also recommended [8], [9].

Although a clear pathway including assessment of unmet needs, appropriate clinician referral, patient use of services, and subsequent resolution of unmet needs would be ideal, few people affected by brain tumors experience such care. We recently conducted a population-based study in the Australian state of Queensland to assess the supportive care needs and use of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, community and psychosocial services, collectively referred to hereafter as ‘support services’, among adults recently diagnosed with a primary brain tumor [10]. Participants reported high levels of unmet needs; forty to seventy percent of patients had a moderate to high level of need for help with each of the five most prevalent supportive care needs at each time point. Patient awareness of support services was high, with all or almost all participants being aware of at least one support service in each category of information, health professionals, support and counseling, and practical assistance. Clinician referral to services varied across categories, but the proportion of patients referred to at least one service in each category ranged from 47% to 81%. However, use of support services was low relative to need, particularly for support and counseling services and practical assistance.

Our results add to growing evidence that a gap between patients’ needs and their use of supports or support services exists [2], [3], [4], [11], [12], [13]. The gap may be partly due to factors relating to the availability of appropriate services, particularly in regional or rural areas [14]. Low clinician rates of referral of people with brain tumors to support services have been demonstrated in the US [15], the UK [16], and Australia [17]. Even if support services are available and accessible, however, patients must choose to use them.

A number of studies have qualitatively explored the reasons why patients with brain tumors use support services of various kinds. These studies suggest that patients want support services to help address their needs for information, navigate through bureaucratic processes, and to return to pre-treatment responsibilities or prepare for long term care [18]. Patients with brain tumors found brain tumor-specific support services valuable for understanding their illness and receiving emotional support [19], and brain tumor support groups helpful to maintain morale [20]. Health professionals were seen as able to provide expert opinion, treatment and support, which was valued as patients grappled with uncertainty over their prognoses and how their diagnoses would affect their quality of life [21]. Cognitive and physical rehabilitation services were used to help patients to understand their impairments and develop strategies to manage them [19], and to ‘get back to normal’, gain independence, maintain hope, and connect with everyday life [22]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically investigated why patients with brain tumors do not use support services, although Hackman suggested that some patients may not understand the purpose of rehabilitation in light of a poor prognosis [22].

The reasons why patients with primary brain tumors do not access support services is unclear. This paper reports a qualitative study designed to explore the experiences of adults with primary brain tumors who have unmet needs. Our purpose here is to explore the reasons reported by patients with brain tumors when explaining their non-use of support services to address their unmet needs.

Section snippets

Methods

Research ethics approval was obtained from Queensland University of Technology Human Research Ethics Committee and the Queensland Cancer Registry (QCR). Methods are described in full elsewhere [10]. Briefly, potential participants were identified through the QCR, a population-based cancer registry which records all brain tumor diagnoses in Queensland, Australia. Eligible participants were adults aged eighteen years and over who had been diagnosed with a malignant or benign primary brain tumor.

Results

All participants in the study reported multiple, often complex, supportive care needs. They mostly discussed these needs as a unitary whole, rather than describing each supportive care need in turn. Across the discussion of these needs, three main themes were identified in relation to support services, with many participants concurrently speaking about the same needs across all themes. The following themes are illustrated using participant quotes and accompanying quantitative data. The themes

Discussion

This study explored the reasoning of participants with primary brain tumors relating to their non-use of support services to address their unmet needs. All participants reported multiple supportive care needs. They mostly discussed these needs as a whole, rather than describing each supportive care need in turn. Across the discussion of these needs three themes relevant to low uptake of support services were identified: “don’t need help”: a perception that support services were not needed;

Conflicts of interest

There exist no conflicts of interest between authors and any persons or institutions involved in this research.

Disclosure

Preliminary findings were presented at the MASCC/ISOO Annual Meeting on Supportive Care in Cancer (June 23–25, 2016).

Informed consent

I confirm all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a 2012 Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation Early Career Researcher Scheme (QUT) grant and the work was primarily conducted at QUT. Dr Danette Langbecker is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Research Fellowship (1072061). The contents of the published material are solely the responsibility of the Administering Institution, a Participating Institution, or individual authors and do not reflect the views of

References (54)

  • R. Mojtabai

    Social comparison of distress and mental health help-seeking in the US general population

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2008)
  • E. Ford et al.

    Systematic review of supportive care needs in patients with primary malignant brain tumors

    Neuro Oncol.

    (2012)
  • E. Davies et al.

    Communication, information and support for adults with malignant cerebral glioma: a systematic literature review

    Support. Care Cancer

    (2003)
  • Australian Cancer Network Adult Brain Tumour Guidelines Working Party

    Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Gliomas: Astrocytomas and Oligodendrogliomas

    (2009)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs

    (2008)
  • National Breast Cancer Centre et al.

    Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Psychosocial Care of Adults With Cancer

    (2003)
  • D. Langbecker et al.

    Primary brain tumor patients’ supportive care needs and multidisciplinary rehabilitation, community and psychosocial support services: awareness, referral and utilization

    J. Neurooncol.

    (2016)
  • A. Arber et al.

    A study of patients with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers: symptoms and access to services

    Int. J. Palliat. Nurs.

    (2010)
  • S. Faithfull et al.

    Palliative care of patients with a primary malignant brain tumour: case review of service use and support provided

    Palliat. Med.

    (2005)
  • V. Sundararajan et al.

    Mapping the patterns of care, the receipt of palliative care and the site of death for patients with malignant glioma

    J. Neurooncol.

    (2014)
  • V. Chan et al.

    Patients with brain tumors: who receives postacute occupational therapy services?

    Am. J. Occup. Ther.

    (2015)
  • S.M. Chang et al.

    Patterns of care for adults with newly diagnosed malignant glioma

    J. Amer. Med. Assoc.

    (2005)
  • S.L. Catt et al.

    A UK-wide survey of follow-up practices for patients with high-grade glioma treated with radical intent

    J. Eval. Clin. Pract.

    (2011)
  • M.A. Rosenthal et al.

    Management of glioma in Victoria (1998–2000): retrospective cohort study

    Med. J. Aust.

    (2006)
  • M. Janda et al.

    Supportive care needs of people with brain tumours and their carers

    Support. Care Cancer

    (2006)
  • T. Ownsworth et al.

    Making sense of brain tumour: a qualitative investigation of personal and social processes of adjustment

    Neuropsychol. Rehabil.

    (2011)
  • M.B. Leavitt et al.

    Brain tumor support group: content themes and mechanisms of support

    Oncol. Nurs. Forum

    (1996)
  • Cited by (28)

    • An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility

      2019, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, supportive care needs are dynamic and changing and as such successful models of support should be flexible and readily available (Biddle et al., 2016). Qualitative data in this study suggest the outreach call program overcame a number of barriers, including patients recognising that services could address their needs and that their needs were valid concerns (Langbecker et al., 2017). This study's findings support the view expressed by Clinton-McHarg et al. (2014), that referral by cancer specialists could overcome the barrier of patients not knowing there is melanoma-specific support and information available.

    • The interplay among psychological distress, the immune system, and brain tumor patient outcomes

      2019, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Standardized surveys have been proposed as mechanisms to better assess psychological distress levels in patients with brain cancer [81–83]. Reducing stigma to increase participation in psychosocial assistance programs is also necessary to properly care for patients with elevated distress levels [84,85]. After identification and connection with psychosocial services, proper treatment can be initiated.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text