Adherence
What matters to patients with heart failure? The influence of non-health-related goals on patient adherence to self-care management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Patients valued autonomy and social relationships as much as physical health.

  • Importance attributed to health goals did not predict self-care adherence.

  • Predictors of self-care adherence varied depending on the type of health behavior.

  • Compatibility between exercise and personal goals predicted exercise adherence.

Abstract

Objective

To describe the life goals of heart failure (HF) patients and to determine whether adherence is influenced by the extent to which these priorities are perceived as compatible with HF self-care regimens.

Method

Forty HF outpatients identified their top-five life goals and indicated the compatibility of HF self-care regimens (diet, exercise, weighing) with these priorities. HF knowledge, self-efficacy and reported adherence were also assessed.

Results

Patients valued autonomy and social relationships as much as physical health. However, the rated importance of these domains did not predict adherence. Adherence positively correlated with the extent to which the regimen, specifically exercise, was considered compatible with life goals (r = .34, p < .05). Exercise adherence also correlated with illness severity and self-efficacy (rs = −.42 and .36, p < .05, respectively). The perceived compatibility of physical activity with personal goals predicted 11% of the variance in exercise adherence above and beyond that accounted for by illness severity and self-efficacy ( (1, 36) = 7.11, p < .05).

Conclusions

Patients’ goals outside of the illness management context influence self-care practices.

Practice implications

Exploring patients’ broad life goals may increase opportunities to resolve ambivalence and enhance motivation for self-care adherence.

Introduction

Ineffective self-care among patients with heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of frequent hospital readmissions, high morbidity and mortality rates, as well as costly health expenditures [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The term ‘self-care’ refers to patient-initiated practices that help maintain and optimize physical wellbeing [6], [7]. HF practice guidelines in the US [8] and Europe [9] stipulate that patients should engage in the following self-care behaviors: (1) restricting salt and fluid intake, (2) daily weighing, and (3) balancing physical activity with rest. However, a recent study [10] of HF patients across 15 countries indicated that 50–80% of individuals never or rarely adhere to these recommendations. Given that self-care is central to the successful management of HF [4], it is crucial to elucidate factors that underlie patient non-compliance [11].

Health behavior models are commonly used to explain patient adherence [12]. These models include the Health Belief Model (HBM) [13], [14], [15], the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM; [16], [17]) and the Theory of Planned Behavior/Theory of Reasoned Actions (TPB/TRA; [18]). Although each theory differs somewhat in the construal and labeling of constructs, all models underscore the importance of patient knowledge and self-efficacy for health behavior [12]. A recurrent finding in the HF literature is that adherence is not solely driven by these cognitive factors [19], [20], [21], [54]. That is, several qualitative studies suggest that HF patients’ decisions to follow self-care recommendations are driven by whether they value the prescribed behavior and perceive it to be an integral part of their lives [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. For example, one study found that among patients with similar knowledge of self-care recommendations, those who prioritized HF management above other life events (e.g., a job transition) were more proficient at self-care [22].

Despite the evidence that assessing patient goals and values can advance the understanding of HF self-care adherence, few studies have examined this process. The main exceptions are interventions that incorporate motivational interviewing (MI) strategies, which direct patients’ awareness to the discrepancies between their current actions and desired goals [27]. Yet, the impact of MI on self-care adherence has been suboptimal [28], [29], [30], arguably because MI programs advocate for HF-related goals (e.g., undertaking physical activity) that are not necessarily important to some patients. As a case in point, a qualitative study found that patients have difficulty prioritizing HF management when they have to attend to other pressing matters, such as taking care of a sick spouse [31]. It is possible that capitalizing on a broad range of patient life-goals and charting their compatibility and incompatibility with self-care regimens may be more conducive to understanding health behavior change.

The phenomenon whereby one goal interferes with the achievement of another is termed goal incompatibility [33]. In non-HF populations, it has been shown that conflicts between personal and exercise goals predict non-compliance with a physical activity regimen [33], [34], [35]. For example, one study [36] asked undergraduate students to list goals for school, home, community or leisure, and rate the extent to which these goals facilitated or conflicted with physical activity. The perceived compatibility of exercise with personal goals predicted physical activity above and beyond self-efficacy and behavioral intention. This suggests that the motivation to perform a health behavior is driven not only by the commitment to a single health goal but also by the interrelations between multiple goals from different life domains.

Examining the dynamic process between competing goals may help to operationalize the construct of motivation in health behavior theories [37], and also serve as a useful clinical approach. To date, no quantitative research has examined whether patients’ competing life priorities influence their self-care practice or whether goal compatibility has a similar degree of impact on adherence as other known predictors of self-care in health behavior frameworks, namely, knowledge and self-efficacy.

As such, the overall aim of the current study was to enhance the understanding of patient motivation for self-care through the examination of their goals. The first objective was to gauge the importance patients accorded to managing HF relative to priorities in other life domains. The second objective was to determine whether the perceived incompatibility of HF self-management with non-health-related goals predicted adherence above and beyond the explanatory power of knowledge and self-efficacy.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were HF patients who received their care from a hospital outpatient heart failure clinic in London, Ontario, Canada. Patients were invited to participate in the study during their scheduled appointment with a HF specialist. Inclusion criteria were: (1) the ability to speak and read English; (2) adequate mental status (as gauged by the attending physician); (3) mild to moderate HF symptoms as identified by the New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) Class II and III guidelines

Participant characteristics

Of the 289 patients screened at the clinic, 88 met the inclusion criteria and 40 (77.0% male; M age = 66.2; SD = 10.0) participated in the study (see Fig. 2). Sample characteristics are presented in Table 3. The majority of the sample met the criteria for NYHA Class II HF (65.0%) and reported being diagnosed with a comorbid disease (70.0%). On average, participants had lived with HF for 5.7 (SD = 3.9) years, were highly educated (mean years = 13.4, SD = 3.8) and were unemployed due to HF (24.3%) or

Discussion

The primary goal of this study was to determine whether considering patients’ broad range of goals could advance the understanding of HF self-care adherence. This study was among the first to elucidate patient priorities outside of HF care in a quantitative manner, and to report on the importance of illness-management when juxtaposed against other goals.

Our results showed that the majority of HF patients’ valued goals related to functional autonomy. The most common top-5 goals chosen by half of

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the MITACS Accelerate Program, in collaboration with Sykes Assistance Services Corporation Internship reference number IT00658. The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources.

References (68)

  • S.A. Hunt et al.

    ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure): developed in collaboration with the American college of chest physicians and the international society for heart and lung transplantation

    Circulation

    (2005)
  • M. Lainscak et al.

    Self-care management of heart failure: practical recommendations from the patient care committee of the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2011)
  • T. Jaarsma et al.

    Comparison of self-care behaviors of heart failure patients in 15 countries worldwide

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2013)
  • N.J. Gardetto

    Self-management in heart failure: where have we been and where should we go?

    J Multidiscip Healthc

    (2011)
  • N.D. Weinstein

    Misleading tests of health behavior theories

    Ann Behav Med

    (2007)
  • G.M. Hochbaum

    Public participation in medical screening programs: a socio-psychological study

    (1958)
  • I.M. Rosenstock

    The health belief model and preventive health behavior

    Health Edu Mono

    (1974)
  • B.T.V. Valeberg et al.

    Prevalence rates for and predictors of self-reported adherence of oncology outpatients with analgesic medications

    Clin J Pain

    (2008)
  • H. Leventhal et al.

    Illness representations and coping with health threats

  • C.L. Hackman et al.

    Theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior-based dietary interventions in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review

    Adolesc Health Med Ther

    (2014)
  • A.M. Clark et al.

    Patient and informal caregivers’ knowledge of heart failure: necessary but insufficient for effective self-care

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2009)
  • M.M.W. Nieuwenhuis et al.

    The body of knowledge on compliance in heart failure patients: we are not there yet

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2009)
  • M.H. van der Wal et al.

    Qualitative examination of compliance in heart failure patients in the Netherlands

    Heart Lung

    (2010)
  • V.V. Dickson et al.

    A typology of heart failure self-care management in non-elders

    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2008)
  • F.D. Hicks et al.

    Self-management decision influences in heart failure: a preliminary investigation

    Clin Nurs Res

    (2003)
  • J. Martensson et al.

    Male patients with congestive heart failure and their conception of the life situation

    J Adv Nurs

    (1997)
  • J. Martensson et al.

    Female patients with congestive heart failure and their conception of the life situation

    J Adv Nurs

    (1998)
  • C.J. Scotto

    The lived experience of adherence for patients with heart failure

    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev

    (2005)
  • W.R. Miller et al.

    Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change

    (2002)
  • D.A. Brodie et al.

    Motivational interviewing to change quality of life for people with chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial

    Int J Nurs Stud

    (2008)
  • V. Paradis et al.

    The efficacy of a motivational nursing intervention based on the stages of change on self-care in heart failure patients

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2010)
  • B. Riegel et al.

    A motivational counseling approach to improving heart failure self-care: mechanisms of effectiveness

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2006)
  • W.A. Gebhardt

    Contextualizing health behaviors: the role of personal goals

  • W.A. Gebhardt

    Health behavior goal model: towards a theoretical framework for health behaviour change

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text