Mind the balance, be contented: Balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.039Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mindfulness was related to Balanced Time Perspective (BTP).

  • Mindfulness and BTP both predicted life satisfaction.

  • BTP partially mediated between mindfulness and life satisfaction.

  • BTP may be a mechanism through which mindfulness exerts its beneficial influences.

Abstract

Both mindfulness and Balanced Time Perspective (BTP) are well confirmed and robust predictors of various aspects of well-being. In the present paper we argue that BTP may be considered one of the potential links between mindfulness and life satisfaction. We collected data from three samples, applying three different measures of mindfulness, as well as the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. BTP was calculated using the Deviation from a Balanced Time Perspective index. Results have shown that BTP might mediate the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction. This effect was replicable across all three samples and for each of the mindfulness measures, however the causal relation between these constructs must be further examined in future studies. The results shed new light on the bases of BTP as well as mindfulness.

Introduction

Mindfulness has become central for both positive psychology and individual differences (e.g., Brown and Ryan, 2003, Giluk, 2009). The increasing popularity of this construct seems to be mainly a result of its well-confirmed benefits for health and well-being (Keng, Smoski and Robins, 2011, Khoury, Lecomte, Fortin, Masse, Therien, Bouchard, et al., 2013) combined with the fact that mindfulness can be cultivated, resulting in highly desirable changes in important life outcomes (Shapiro, Oman, Thoresen, Plante, & Flinders, 2008). Personality psychologists have attempted to identify mindfulness' nomological network, aiming to uncover potential mechanisms through which mindfulness exerts its salubrious effects. For instance, Schutte and Malouff (2011) showed that emotional intelligence mediated between mindfulness and higher positive affect, lower negative affect, and greater life satisfaction, and Coffey and Hartman (2008) showed that emotion regulation, nonattachment, and rumination mediated between mindfulness and psychological distress. In the present paper we focus on the construct of Balanced Time Perspective, analyzing its mediating role between three measures of mindfulness and life satisfaction.

Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, and Freedman (2006) note that mindfulness is composed of three components: intention (why we do what we do), attention (self-regulated and present-oriented), and attitude (open hearted, friendly, curious). As a non-judging, present-oriented mode of consciousness that involves the awareness of awareness itself, of one's own cognition and affect other stimuli and sensations that are present in the moment (e.g., Bishop et al., 2004), mindfulness may enhance self-knowledge by increasing the amount of information one consciously receives, and by simultaneously attenuating ego-protective defense mechanisms that usually act to prevent information that contradicts positive and/or accustomed self-perception from entering conscious awareness (Carlson, 2013). As a certain kind of relating to the present moment, mindfulness can also be seen as a time perspective (TP) (Seema and Sircova, 2013, Zimbardo and Boyd, 2008).

Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) define TP as “the often nonconscious process whereby the continual flows of personal and social experiences are assigned to temporal categories, or time frames, that help to give order, coherence, and meaning to those events” (p. 1271). This perceptual process is dynamic, yet individuals usually put a relative emphasis or develop a habitual focus on one of the time frames, which results in the emergence of a relatively stable bias (Boniwell & Zimbardo, 2004), reflected in individual TP profile. In their conceptual model, Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) distinguished five TPs: Past Positive, Past Negative, Present Fatalistic, Present Hedonistic, and Future.

Our time is limited, and over-using one temporal category leads to under-using others. For instance, one may remain permanently focused on the future, achieving impressive career successes, but fail to achieve happiness, due to a developed inability to live in the present. Such temporal bias could be a consequence of a number of factors, including individual experiences, culture, religion, social class, education (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2008), personality (Dunkel & Weber, 2010), and traumas (Sword, Sword, Brunskill, & Zimbardo, 2014). The most adaptive attitude towards temporal frames has been labeled Balanced Time Perspective (BTP; Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999). The authors defined balance as “the mental ability to switch effectively among TPs depending on task features, situational considerations, and personal resources, rather than be biased towards a specific TP that is not adaptive across situations” (Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999, p. 1285).

Stolarski, Bitner, and Zimbardo (2011) provided a continuous indicator of BTP labeled Deviation from the BTP (DBTP). The method has been described as the most optimal among available methods of assessment of BTP using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (Stolarski, Wiberg and Osin, 2015, Zhang, Howell and Stolarski, 2013) and thus was applied in the present study.

There is increasing evidence that individual differences in TP are linked to well-being, even controlling for standard dimensions of personality (Zhang & Howell, 2011). TP predicts a variety of relevant criteria including life satisfaction (Boniwell, Osin, Linley, & Ivanchenko, 2010), health behaviors (Daugherty & Brase, 2010), mental health (Vowinckel, Westerhof, Bohlmeijer & Webster, in press) and transient moods (Stolarski, Matthews, Postek, Zimbardo, & Bitner, 2014). Each TP dimension is more or less strongly related to well-being (see Cunningham, Zhang, & Howell, 2015), but the most consistent effects were observed for BTP (e.g., Zhang et al., 2013).

Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) emphasize the fact that the temporal framing process is usually nonconscious and point out that most people rarely take a metacognitive perspective towards their perceptions of own past, future, and present (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2008). However, to develop a BTP one needs to become aware of TP, in order to increase flexibility in adapting to a current situation. Lennings (1998) highlighted the fundamental role of a strong sense of time awareness while describing the (most adaptive) actualizer temporal profile. Boniwell and Zimbardo (2004) followed his argumentation, stating that flexibility and ‘switchability’ are essential components of a BTP, and allow ‘balanced’ individuals to operate in a temporal mode appropriate to the situation in which they find themselves.

As Dreyfus (2011) argues, mindful attention must not necessarily be directed towards an object that is ‘located’ in the present moment. Hence, objects of mindful attention can also be (in) the past or the future. Since mindfulness is synonymous, or at least intrinsically associated with skills of self-regulation of attention, including flexibility, sustaining and switching of attention (Bishop et al., 2004) and ‘in an optimally balanced time perspective, the past, present and future components blend and flexibly engage, depending on a situation's demands and our needs and values’ (Zimbardo, 2002, p. 62), mindfulness is likely to be a fruitful context for facilitating the emergence and maintenance of BTP (cf. Drake, Duncan, Sutherland, Abernethy and Henry, 2008, Vowinckel, 2012).

Empirical evidence supports the above reasoning. Mindfulness is positively associated with psychological flexibility (Fledderus, Bohlmeijer, Smit, & Westerhof, 2010), deautomatization of cognitive processes (Kang, Gruber, & Gray, 2013) and increased self-control (Leonard et al., 2013). BTP seems to emerge from these processes: a flexible switching between particular temporal perspectives is its core, whereas automatic and non-reflective, externally induced time horizon foci are typical for unbalanced TP profiles (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999, Zimbardo and Boyd, 2008). Indeed, BTP and mindfulness are positively associated (Drake, Duncan, Sutherland, Abernethy and Henry, 2008, Seema and Sircova, 2013, Vowinckel, Westerhof, Bohlmeijer and Webster, 2015).

In the present study we tested the potential role of BTP in the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction. In three studies applying different measures of mindfulness we examined whether the construct of BTP may shed new light on the mindfulness–satisfaction link.

Section snippets

Measures

Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) in the Polish (Jankowski, 2015) and Dutch (Steverink, Westerhof, Bode, & Dittmann-Kohli, 2001) translations were used. SWLS consists of five items scored with a seven-point (studies 1 and 2) or 5-point (study 3) Likert-type response format measuring global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life.

Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS; Brown & Ryan, 2003) in the Polish translation by Jankowski (2014) was

Study 1

The correlation analysis revealed that life satisfaction was positively related to mindfulness and negatively to DBTP. Two hierarchical regressions were performed to test whether DBTP predicted unique variance in life satisfaction beyond mindfulness. The model with mindfulness as a sole predictor of life satisfaction was significant and accounted for 5% of the variance; entering DBTP into the regression model accounted for an additional 11% of the variance. Next, we conducted a second

Discussion

In previous studies BTP has been linked to various measures of subjective well-being. From a theoretical perspective, awareness of one's own TPs should strongly facilitate BTP or probably even enable its emergence. Mindfulness can be interpreted as an individual difference variable that defines general individual degree of conscious awareness and ability to self-regulate attention. Therefore, we expected mindfulness to predict BTP which is known to predict subjective well-being (Zhang et al.,

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by a grant no. 2014/13/D/HS6/02951 of the National Science Centre, Poland.

References (48)

  • I. Boniwell et al.

    Time perspective coaching

  • I. Boniwell et al.

    Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning

  • I. Boniwell et al.

    A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples

    The Journal of Positive Psychology

    (2010)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2003)
  • E.N. Carlson

    Overcoming the barriers to self-knowledge: Mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are

    Perspectives on Psychological Science

    (2013)
  • K.A. Coffey et al.

    Mechanisms of action in the inverse relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress

    Complementary Health Practice Review

    (2008)
  • K.F. Cunningham et al.

    Time perspectives and subjective well-being: A dual-pathway framework

  • E. Diener et al.

    The satisfaction with life scale

    Journal of Personality Assessment

    (1985)
  • L. Drake et al.

    Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing

    Time & Society

    (2008)
  • G. Dreyfus

    Is mindfulness present-centred and non-judgmental? A discussion of the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness

    Contemporary Buddhism

    (2011)
  • C.S. Dunkel et al.

    Using three levels of personality to predict time perspective

    Current Psychology

    (2010)
  • M. Fledderus et al.

    Mental health promotion as a new goal in public mental health care: A randomized controlled trial of an intervention enhancing psychological flexibility

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2010)
  • P. Grossman et al.

    Mindfulness, by any other name…: Trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science

    Contemporary Buddhism

    (2011)
  • Jankowski, K. S. (2014). Skala Uważności – polskie tłumaczenie Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Unpublished...
  • Cited by (79)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text