Preoccupied attachment, need to belong, shame, and interpersonal perfectionism: An investigation of the Perfectionism Social Disconnection Model
Introduction
Perfectionism, as it has been established in its literature of the past two decades, is a multidimensional construct that incorporates both self-related and interpersonally-related components (e.g., Frost et al., 1990, Hewitt and Flett, 1991, Hewitt et al., 2003). In addition to perfectionistic traits that drive various kinds of perfectionistic behavior (Hewitt & Flett, 1991), perfectionistic self-presentation styles involve the interpersonal expression of perfectionism (Hewitt et al., 2003), and automatic perfectionistic cognitions reflect the intrapersonal expression of perfectionism (Flett, Hewitt, Blankstein, & Gray, 1998). Perfectionistic traits (Hewitt & Flett, 1991) consist of self-oriented perfectionism (demanding perfection of oneself), other-oriented perfectionism (demanding perfection of others), and socially prescribed perfectionism (perceiving others as demanding perfection of oneself). Whereas trait perfectionism encompasses the need to achieve perfection, perfectionistic self-presentation involves the drive to appear perfect by promoting a public image of perfection, concealing or not disclosing perceived flaws and imperfections. This form of impression management consists of three distinct facets (Hewitt et al., 2003): perfectionistic self-promotion (public promotion of one’s supposedly perfect image), nondisplay of imperfection (avoidance of behavioral displays of one’s perceived imperfection), and nondisclosure of imperfection (avoidance of verbal disclosures of imperfection).
Previous research has linked interpersonal components of perfectionism such as socially prescribed perfectionism and perfectionistic self-presentation with negative psychological outcomes including depression, anxiety, eating disorders, personality disorders, and suicide behavior (for a review, see Egan, Wade, & Shafran, 2011). Furthermore, the importance of perfectionism in the interpersonal realm has been demonstrated by its associations with problems involving control, intimacy, negative rumination, emotional expressiveness, and assertiveness (e.g., Hewitt et al., 2008, Mackinnon and Sherry, 2012). Despite a large body of evidence supporting the link between interpersonal perfectionism and psychological problems, the developmental process of interpersonal perfectionism has received relatively little empirical attention.
Since early childhood, people develop internal ‘working models’ of the self and others based on early relationship experiences, from which they acquire affect-regulatory capacity and skills to create and establish positive, meaningful relationships throughout life (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). The rupture or non-attunement in early attachment relationships has long-term negative consequences on one’s personality development and socio-emotional functioning (Bowlby, 1980). Unlike securely attached individuals, individuals with insecure attachment have chronically unmet needs for acceptance and belongingness, as well as strong negative affective reactions to actual or imagined social exclusion or ostracism (for reviews, see Baumeister and Leary, 1995, Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007).
Based on Bowlby’s (1980) attachment theory, Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) proposed four adult attachment styles based on four quadrants of positive versus negative models of self and others, including secure (positive self and positive others), preoccupied (negative self and positive others), fearful (negative self and negative others), and dismissing (positive self and negative others) styles. Whereas individuals with a positive other model (i.e., secure, preoccupied attachment) are motivated by a strong need for belongingness and therefore tend to approach others for intimacy and support, those with a negative other model (i.e., fearful, dismissing attachment) are less driven by a desire for belongingness and hence are more inclined to avoid emotional intimacy (e.g., Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991). Preoccupied individuals may have a particularly strong need to belong, to fit in, or to feel accepted (Bartholomew and Horowitz, 1991, Feeney and Noller, 1990). Ironically, preoccupied individuals’ hypervigilance to rejection and their maladaptive efforts to avoid conflicts or abandonment can create significant challenges forming and maintaining mutually supportive close relationships (Feeney and Noller, 1990, Hazan and Shaver, 1987).
Bowlby (1980) further suggested that early attachment relationships give rise to powerful, enduring emotions, such as shame. Shame is generally considered a negative, intense affective reaction following perceived rejections and losses and is often associated with global negative self-attributions (e.g., “I am an unlovable person for having done…,” Lewis, 1971). Lewis (1971) suggested that the treatment of oneself by loved ones such as parental figures can become internalized standards that are used to evaluate the self. Shame, therefore, at least in part, is caused by perceived failures to meet others’ expectations. Preoccupied individuals who have an inordinate need for belongingness are particularly susceptible to shame, partly due to the tendency to blame oneself for perceived failures and rejections (Cross and Hansen, 2000, Wei et al., 2005). In order to minimize the risk for rejection, people often modify their thoughts and attitudes, or learn to act or present themselves in ways in which they can obtain approval and acceptance (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). It has been theorized that individuals with an anxious or preoccupied attachment orientation may attempt to be or appear “perfect” or hide imperfections as a way of mitigating the sense of shame and enhancing a sense of connectedness with others (Hewitt et al., 2014, Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007).
Building on earlier theoretical and empirical work on early attachment and personality development (e.g., Banai et al., 2005, Bowlby, 1980, Horney, 1950, Mikulincer, 1995), Hewitt, Flett, Sherry, and Caelian (2006) developed and expanded (Hewitt et al., 2014) a model of perfectionism and psychopathology called the Perfectionism Social Disconnection Model (PSDM). The PSDM postulates that perfectionism, particularly socially prescribed perfectionism and perfectionistic self-presentation, may originate from difficult or traumatic relational experiences with primary attachment figures (Hewitt et al., 2014). These early experiences may give rise to insecure attachment with others, and an overwhelming sense of shame, as well as powerful but unfulfilled needs for acceptance and approval (Banai et al., 2005, Hewitt et al., 2014, Horney, 1950). As described earlier, preoccupied individuals may be especially motivated to meet perfectionistic demands set by others or to present a perfect or flawless façade. Perfectionism, especially perfectionistic self-presentation, is therefore seen as a means to secure acceptance and caring from others and to avoid rejection, shame, and humiliation. Paradoxically, for these individuals, the very same behaviors that were engaged to enhance one’s connection can often create further rejections and alienation (Hewitt et al., 2006, Hewitt et al., 2014).
Recent studies have found preliminary evidence supporting the PSDM. Chen and colleagues (2012) found that the significant association between fearful attachment and social disconnection was partially mediated by nondisclosure of imperfections in adolescents. Furthermore, Boone (2013) demonstrated that anxious attachment as assessed by the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (Fraley, Waller, & Brennan, 2000) was positively associated with socially prescribed perfectionism, perfectionistic self-presentation, and binge eating behavior among adolescents, and perfectionistic self-promotion fully mediated the association between avoidant attachment and binge eating. Together, these findings indicate a strong relationship between attachment styles and perfectionistic self-presentation, at least among adolescents, and that perfectionism may result in the opposite of what it is intended to – alienation, distress, and a thwarted sense of belonging.
Despite preliminary evidence supporting the Perfectionism Social Disconnection Model, the extant research does not address the mechanism by which insecure attachment may be associated with interpersonal components of perfectionism. For example, thwarted belongingness and a sense of shame that are central to the PSDM have received little empirical attention. Furthermore, previous studies (e.g., Boone, 2013, Chen et al., 2012) focused only on adolescents. Therefore, an important goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship between insecure attachment and perfectionism through their associations with the need to belong and shame in young adults.
In summary, we hypothesized that, first, socially prescribed perfectionism and perfectionistic self-presentation would be positively associated with insecure attachment styles, the need to belong, and a sense of shame. Secondly, in keeping with the PSDM (Hewitt et al., 2006, Hewitt et al., 2014), preoccupied attachment was hypothesized to enhance the need for belongingness and feelings of shame, which in turn would elevate levels of socially prescribed perfectionism and perfectionistic self-presentation.
Section snippets
Participants and procedure
The participants were 513 undergraduate students (148 males, 365 females) recruited from University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Participants’ age ranged between 17 and 50 years of age (M = 20.61, SD = 3.14). Upon completion all participants were debriefed and received extra course credits for their participation. The study received ethical approval from the university research ethics board.
Measures
Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Hewitt & Flett, 1991) assesses perfectionistic traits
Descriptive statistics
The means, standard deviations, and Cronbach’s alpha for all study measures are displayed in Table 1, which are consistent with previous studies using undergraduate samples (e.g., Griffin and Bartholomew, 1994, Leary et al., 2012, Marschall et al., 1994). Independent t-test analyses revealed that female participants scored significantly higher on the need for belongingness than their male counterparts, t = 2.62, p < .01, and hence gender was entered as a covariate in the subsequent mediation
Discussion
The present study replicates and extends previous research (Boone, 2013, Chen et al., 2012) by demonstrating significant associations between the interpersonal components of perfectionism (i.e., socially prescribed perfectionism, perfectionistic self-presentation), insecure attachment styles, the need for belongingness, and shame. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to have demonstrated a significantly mediated effect of the need to belong and shame in the associations
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC; 410-2009-1050) awarded to Paul L. Hewitt.
References (34)
Are attachment styles differentially related to interpersonal perfectionism and binge eating symptoms?
Personality and Individual Differences
(2013)- et al.
Insecure attachment, perfectionistic self-presentation, and social disconnection in adolescents
Personality and Individual Differences
(2012) - et al.
Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review
Clinical Psychology Review
(2011) - et al.
Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: A three-wave longitudinal study
Personality and Individual Differences
(2012) - et al.
Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation
(1978) - et al.
“Selfobject” needs in Kohut’s self psychology: Links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation, and adjustment
Psychoanalytic Psychology
(2005) - et al.
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1991) - et al.
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation
Psychological Bulletin
(1995) Attachment and loss
- et al.
Clarifying the experience of shame: The role of attachment style, gender, and investment in relatedness
Personality and Individual Differences
(2000)
Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Psychological distress and the frequency of perfectionistic thinking
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The dimensions of perfectionism
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (55)
Father-daughter and mother-son relationships: Parental bonding behaviours and socially prescribed perfectionism in young adults
2023, Personality and Individual DifferencesThe destructiveness and public health significance of socially prescribed perfectionism: A review, analysis, and conceptual extension
2022, Clinical Psychology ReviewCitation Excerpt :The social disconnection inherent in socially prescribed perfectionism also attests to the failure to satisfy the need to connect and relate well to other people. This can become reflected in related unmet needs such as the need to belong (see Chen, Hewitt, & Flett, 2015) and to matter (Flett, Galfi-Pechenkov, Molnar, Hewitt, & Goldstein, 2012). Not surprisingly, this destructive motivational orientation impairs goal-related activities and outcomes.
Roads less travelled to self-forgiveness: Can psychological flexibility overcome chronic guilt/shame to achieve genuine self-forgiveness?
2021, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceParent autonomy support as moderator: Testing the expanded perfectionism social disconnection model
2021, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Temporal confounding factors such as the mediator and criterion being measured at the same time (Sherry et al., 2013) are inherent in two-wave longitudinal studies. There is one longitudinal study based on PSDM where ECP was found to predict depression (Smith et al., 2018), but tests of the theory had mostly been cross-sectional (Chen, Hewitt, & Flett, 2015; Roxborough et al., 2012; Sherry et al., 2008). Evidence that links ECP to psychopathology through stress (Hewitt et al., 2006) are also cross-sectional (Ashby et al., 2012; Chang, 2000; Chang, Watkins, & Banks, 2004).