The relationship between reward and punishment sensitivity and antisocial behavior in male adolescents
Introduction
Theories that emphasize the biological basis of personality, such as Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST; Gray, 1970), have contributed to a better understanding of the etiology of antisocial behavior (ASB). The RST proposes that reward and punishment systems underlie behavior and affect. Although increasing research has focused on the examination of RST in relation to aspects of ASB, there is a dearth of studies employing direct measures of RST in antisocial adolescents. Adolescence is an interesting time for investigating ASB and reward processing in particular; offending peaks during this period and heightened reward seeking has been implicated in the increased risk taking observed (see Moffitt, 1993, Steinberg, 2008). In addition, it must be noted that ASB is a complex construct encompassing clinical (e.g., conduct disorder, psychopathic traits) and legal approaches (e.g., delinquency). The present research examines multiple approaches to ASB in order to appreciate the heterogeneity in the behavior and the risk factors involved during adolescence.
The RST comprises three hypothetical motivational systems that respond to different reinforcing events; the Behavioral Activation System (BAS), Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and the Fight–Flight–Freeze system (FFFS). The BAS is an appetitive system, it is considered to regulate responses to rewarding stimuli, and is associated with activation in dopaminergic pathways. High BAS sensitivity is thought to lead to increased approach behavior in the presence of reward. The BIS was considered to regulate response to aversive stimuli and associated with activation in the septo-hippocampal system. High BIS was thought to lead to inhibition of movement towards goals (Carver & White, 1994). Recent revisions to the RST suggest that the FFFS is now responsible for mediating reactions to aversive stimuli and the BIS is involved in resolution of goal conflict in general (Gray & McNaughton, 2000). In the absence of new measures to reflect this revision this paper refers to BIS/FFFS as BIS functioning (See Corr, 2004).
The RST has provided a useful framework for understanding the relationship between personality and psychopathology; with those at the extreme on the BIS/BAS dimensions most at risk (Bijttebier, Beck, Claes, & Vandereycken, 2009). In general, elevated BAS has been associated with increased risk for externalising difficulties and elevated BIS with internalising problems (Bijttebier et al., 2009). In addition, it has been proposed that low BIS may underlie some externalising related disorders (e.g., Quay, 1997).
Research specifically examining the relationship between RST and delinquency in adolescents is rare. In a notable exception, Hasking (2007) demonstrated that self-reported delinquency was positively correlated with the drive to seek out rewards but contrary to predictions there was a negative correlation between the response to reward and delinquency. BIS was not associated with delinquency in the sample. The authors explained the unexpected negative association in terms of mediation by coping variables. Nevertheless, the study was susceptible to floor effects as the young people were recruited from private schools and displayed a limited range of ASB. Further research is required to examine BIS/BAS in youths with increased levels of ASB.
There has been relatively more research interest on the role of reward and punishment sensitivity in the personality disorder of psychopathy in adults. The BIS is thought to be low in psychopaths leading to deficits in the experience of anxiety and to impulsivity as cues for punishment fail to inhibit reward seeking behavior (e.g., Fowles, 1980, Hart and Dempster, 1997). In addition, it has been suggested that psychopathy may result from an overactive BAS with hypersensitivity to reward leading to disinhibited behavior (Gorenstein and Newman, 1980, Uzieblo et al., 2007). However, psychopathy is considered to encompass discrete subtypes that may differentially relate to reward and punishment (e.g., Lykken, 1995). The evidence in relation to this is mixed, but the results can tentatively be summarized by suggesting that BAS hypersensitivity is a risk factor for both primary (interpersonal and affective) and secondary (antisocial) psychopathy, whereas BIS underactivity is related to primary psychopathy only (Bijttebier et al., 2009, Newman et al., 2005, Ross et al., 2009, Uzieblo et al., 2007). There have been few studies on BIS/BAS in youngsters potentially high in psychopathic traits.
The RST and substance use has been extensively studied; alcohol and drugs have rewarding properties and given that individuals with elevated BAS are considered more reward sensitive it is hypothesized that increased BAS is associated with alcohol and drug use (Franken & Muris, 2006). Support for this comes from research using a range of clinical and non clinical samples (e.g., Franken et al., 2006, Johnson et al., 2003, Willem et al., 2012). In one exception a study failed to find an association between alcohol use and BAS sensitivity in younger adolescents; the authors argued that the low levels of alcohol use and lack of variance may be the most likely explanation (Hasking, 2006). The implication is that an examination of alcohol use in an adolescent sample known to display increased alcohol use is likely to yield more meaningful results. In addition, findings on alcohol use and BIS are equivocal, although the evidence is suggestive of a negative relationship, and further research is required to examine this association (see Bijttebier et al., 2009).
The present research examined the association between reward and punishment traits and ASB in adolescent males. Firstly, the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales (Carver & White, 1994; arguably the most well validated measure of BIS/BAS sensitivity) were assessed in young offenders (YOs) and non-offending normal controls (NCs). Reward seeking peaks in adolescence and this is thought to underlie the increased risk taking characteristic of this developmental period. It was interesting to assess whether the YOs who exhibit more extreme levels of ASB, were also more extreme on the reward dimension compared to NCs. Secondly, the study explored BAS and BIS sensitivity in relation to various dimensions related to ASB (psychopathy, conduct problems, and alcohol use) in the group as a whole (given the dimensional nature of the ASB measures this was deemed appropriate) as well as offence frequency in the offenders. It was hypothesized broadly that BAS levels would demonstrate a positive relationship with multiple aspects of ASB. In addition given theories linking low BIS to externalising disorders it was hypothesized that reduced BIS would be associated with ASB.
Section snippets
Participants and procedure
The young offender (YO) group consisted of 85 males, aged 12–18 years old; each of whom had been convicted of at least one offence. We focused on males as there were too few female offenders available for testing. They were recruited from the Youth Offending Service, a statutory body that manages YOs in the community. The normal control (NC) group (n = 50) were males aged 13–17 years, recruited from comprehensive schools, who had no prior contact with the criminal justice system. Participants
Results
Table 1 presents the demographic descriptives; there were no differences between the groups in estimated IQ [t (56.46) = −1.65, p > .05] ethnicity [χ2 (1) = .88, p > .05] or in socioeconomic status [χ2 (2) = .95, p > .05]. However, the YOs were significantly older than the NCs [t(133) = 4.09, p < .01].
One way ANCOVAs (age as a covariate) were used to explore between group differences on the measures. As can be seen in Table 2, the YO group scored significantly higher than the NC group on BAS Drive and
Discussion
The study examined the relationship between reward and punishment and ASB in adolescents. The between group analyses indicated that YOs showed increased levels of BAS (Drive) and lower levels of BIS compared to NCs. The results of the regression analyses demonstrated that high BAS (Drive and Fun) was associated with increased psychopathy, conduct problems and alcohol use. Surprisingly, BAS Reward Responsiveness (the positive response/reactivity to and anticipation of rewards) was negatively
References (35)
- et al.
What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Brain Research Review
(1998) - et al.
Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality–psychopathology associations
Clinical Psychology Review
(2009) Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
(2004)- et al.
BIS/BAS personality characteristics and college students’ substance use
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006) - et al.
Gray’s model of personality and addiction
Addictive Behaviors
(2006) The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion
Behavioral Research Therapy
(1970)Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, disordered eating and drinking behavior in adolescents
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006)Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, and delinquent behavior in adolescents
Journal of Adolescence
(2007)- et al.
High BAS, but not low BIS, predicts externalising symptoms in adults
Personality and Individual Differences
(2008) - et al.
Psychopathic traits in adolescence: Associations with the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory systems
Personality and Individual Differences
(2011)
The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations
Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Developmental Review
The psychopathic personality inventory: Construct validity of the two-factor structure
Personality and Individual Differences
Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles
Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: A new assessment tool
Validity and stability of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory in a nonforensic sample of young adults
Journal of Personality Assessment
Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (33)
The association between callous-unemotional traits and substance use in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, Journal of Affective DisordersDrivers' reported crash history, sensitivity to reward and punishment, personality, and demographics: A case study in Iran
2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesAnxious activism: The role of behavioral inhibition system in the radicalization process
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Taken together, it is viable to propose that anxiety and the BIS are crucial individual differences affecting the tendencies to be influenced by extreme content online, and potential intentions for later behavioral engagement. A wealth of previous research has found that trait differences in RST processes, most notably the with BAS, are a predictor of various antisocial behaviors (Bacon et al., 2018; Morgan et al., 2014; Palmieri et al., 2021; Poythress & Hall, 2011). However, recent research has identified that trait BIS is a significant predictor of both proactive and reactive aggression (Parker et al., 2022).