The role of active inhibitory control in psychological well-being and mindfulness
Highlights
► We investigate the relationship between the capacity for active inhibition and well-being. ► The results showed that people with a higher capacity for active inhibition have more well-being. ► They are less likely to be depressed. ► They are more capable of focusing on the current task without getting distracted.
Introduction
The inhibition of unwanted information is essential for everyday human cognition. Inhibition is required while humans process external input. The environment contains many objects that distract people from their target objects. In order to locate an object that one seeks and ignore all other distracting objects, one must use distractor inhibition (Tipper, 1985, Tipper, 2001). Inhibition is also a component of action control. Response inhibition is used to suppress prepotent responses; it is necessary in order to avoid the production of an inappropriate action (Logan & Cowan, 1984). In addition, inhibition is required in order to process internal thoughts and memories (Anderson and Green, 2001, Levy et al., 2007); without inhibition, irrelevant or disturbing thoughts or memories might overwhelm the individual.
Inhibition is also crucial for emotional regulation. Consistent with this idea, it has been demonstrated that impaired cognitive inhibition is associated with depression (Frings et al., 2007, Goeleven et al., 2006, Joormann, 2004, Joormann and Gotlib, 2010). In these studies, negative priming, which is an automatic inhibition task (Nigg, 2000) was used to measure the performance of cognitive inhibition. However, the role of active inhibitory control in emotion regulation and psychological well-being has not yet been clarified.
It is important to make a distinction between automatic and active inhibition because the latter is also an important mechanism for emotion regulation in daily life. Automatic inhibition, such as negative priming (Tipper, 1985, Tipper, 2001) or inhibition of return (Posner & Cohen, 1984; see Klein, 2000 for a review), can operate without a person’s awareness of the distracting information or an incentive to inhibit the non-predictive cues. In contrast, active or intentional inhibition operates via effortful control and involves executive functioning (Nigg, 2000). Consistent with this idea, active inhibition requires working memory resources in order to operate (Chao, 2010a, Chao, 2011). In addition, active inhibition is observed only when there is an incentive or an intention to actively inhibit the distractor (Chao, 2010a, Chao, 2011) and when there is sufficient time for active inhibition to take place (Chao, 2010a).
The ability to exert active inhibitory control is important for emotional regulation. Active inhibitory control provides a method by which people can deliberately exclude emotional distractors (e.g., an angry face, a negative thought, or a negative event) that may affect their well-being. By excluding unwanted emotional information, people can focus on desired or goal-related information and thereby promote their own well-being. For instance, in a recent study on the role of attentional control of emotional distractors in times of life stress, Vanderhasselt, Koster, Goubert, and De Raedt (in press) suggested that the capacity to overcome distraction caused by emotional information may promote adaptive responses to stress. Considering their findings, active inhibition, a mechanism for actively excluding unwanted distractors, could be important for adaptive coping and well-being. In addition, Lee, Lin, Huang, and Fredrickson (in press) argued that the process of emotional control plays an important role in achieving peace of mind (i.e., the enjoyment of a peaceful and balanced life). Active inhibition, as one important mechanism for cognitive control, may help people to exclude undesired emotional information and thoughts and hence promote peace of mind. Considering the importance of active inhibition, we hypothesize that people with higher capacities for active inhibition are more capable of voluntarily reducing interference from unwanted emotional distractors, and hence, they have higher levels of psychological well-being. In the present paper, we report two studies investigating this prediction.
Section snippets
Study 1
The relationship between active inhibition and psychological well-being was examined in Study 1. We predicted that people with high capacities for active inhibition have better psychological well-being than those with low capacities for active inhibition. We used two scales to reveal the relationship between the capacity for active inhibition and psychological well-being. One was the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985), which is commonly used to reveal
Study 2
Study 1 demonstrated the relationship between the capacity for active inhibition and psychological well-being using two positive measures. The present study aims to examine this relationship using a positive index, which had been used in Study 1 (PoM; Lee et al., in press), and a negative index (CES-D; Radloff, 1977).
We hypothesized that people can use active inhibition to reduce interference from unwanted emotional distractors and to focus on their current target. In order to test this idea,
General discussion
The present study investigates the role of active inhibition in psychological well-being and mindfulness. We hypothesized that active inhibitory control plays an important role in emotion regulation, and is especially crucial in inhibiting unwanted, irrelevant emotional information. Hence, people with a higher capacity for active inhibition are more likely to enjoy better psychological well-being. Consistent with this hypothesis, Studies 1 and 2 show that in comparison to the low-capacity
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan to Y.-C. Lee (NSC 99-2410-H033-056) and H.-F. Chao (NSC 96-2629-S-033-002 & NSC 97-2511-S-033-006-MY2).
References (31)
- et al.
Deficient inhibition of emotional information in depression
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2006) Inhibition of return
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2000)- et al.
Cueing the location of a distractor: An inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
Acta Psychologica
(2008) - et al.
Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006) - et al.
Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control
Nature
(2001) - et al.
Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness
Assessment
(2006) - et al.
Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples
Assessment
(2008) - et al.
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(2003) - Chang, J. -H., Lin, Y. -C., & Huang, C. -L. (2010). Exploring the mechanism of mindfulness: From attention to...
Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: The benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
(2010)
Inhibition of return to negative emotion: Evidence from an emotional expression detection task
Emotion
Active inhibition of a distractor word: The distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Depression in Taiwan: Epidemiological survey utilizing CES-D
Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica
The satisfaction with life scale
Journal of Personality Assessment
Cited by (25)
Individual differences in peace of mind reflect adaptive emotion regulation
2023, Personality and Individual DifferencesProactive and reactive cognitive control for emotional conflict in individuals with high schizotypy: An ERP study
2023, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :Distractors could be non-emotional or emotional (Shen et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2010). Emotionally salient stimuli in the environment usually interfere with our ongoing behavior, therefore, we need to inhibit the interference of these emotional stimuli so we can achieve our goals (Lee and Chao, 2012). Patients with schizophrenia and individuals with high schizotypy (a high-risk group of schizophrenia) have been found to be impaired in cognitive control, but most of these studies focused on non-emotional interference (Jia et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2012; Markela-Lerenc et al., 2009; McNeely et al., 2003).
The Effects of Combined Physical and Cognitive Training on Inhibitory Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The positive, moderate effect size and largest body of evidence in this review, thus most powered, is that healthy individuals (n studies = 8, n participants = 420) benefit from the combined training. This has promising implications for the capacity of combined training to enhance general wellbeing as greater inhibitory control is associated with strong life satisfaction (Lee & Chao, 2012), mindfulness (Oberle et al., 2012), and emotional regulation (Hudson & Jacques, 2014). Thus, whilst combined physical and cognitive training may be particularly effective when inhibition is impaired (i.e., in older adults due to ageing), the current results indicate that there is also capacity for enhancement of healthy inhibitory control systems.
Individual differences in self-attributed mindfulness levels are related to the experience of time and cognitive self-control
2014, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Conceptually this was to be expected. Since ‘impulsiveness’ can be seen as being on the other end of a conceptual continuum with ‘self-control’, our results complement prior research with different assessment techniques showing higher self-control in individuals with higher trait-mindfulness (Bowlin & Baer, 2012; Lee & Chao, 2012; Sauer et al., 2011a). Our findings add to results of a previous study with college students (Wittmann et al., 2011) showing how individuals with self-reported higher impulsiveness scores in the BIS had a less pronounced future perspective as measured with the ZTPI and were less accurate (a larger temporal under-reproduction) in an auditory duration reproduction task with duration in the multiple-second range.