Personality types and self-reported aggressiveness
Section snippets
Personality and self-reported aggressiveness
Aggression continues to play a prominent role in clinical disorders, in conjunction with maladjusted and socially inappropriate behavior, in the case of criminal offenders, or even in conflicts at school or in a partnership. Among the self-report inventories that have been developed to measure aggressiveness, the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ; Buss & Perry, 1992) is a widely used instrument, and its validity has been established in numerous investigations (Felsten and Hill, 1999, Gallo and
Participants
The sample consisted of 141 participants aged 18–55 years (M = 22.8, SD = 5.75) from a student population attending introductory lectures in Psychology. About 84% were between 18 and 25 years old. The students were enrolled in different classes (Psychology, Sociology and Education) at the University of Leipzig. 116 of them were female and 25 were male. They were asked for participation on a voluntary basis and were given course credit for participation. Data collection took place in an individual
Description of personality types
A three-cluster solution will be presented because it is the most commonly accepted in the literature on personality types and the other solutions considered (four and five clusters) did not add further information or were not interpretable. We will first characterize the three personality types found here by describing their cluster centers (means) on each of the Big Five dimensions and will then search for concomitant patterns in aggressiveness. The values are given in standardized z-scores
Discussion
Based on the Big Five Factor Model of personality, we have identified three personality prototypes in this investigation: a resilient type with low Neuroticism and high Extraversion with about average aggression scores slightly below the group mean, a reserved overcontrolled type low in Extraversion and Openness but high in Agreeableness and Conscientiousness with the lowest aggression scores, and a non-desirable one high in Neuroticism and low in Extraversion, Agreeableness and
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Marcus Roth for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
References (31)
- et al.
Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later
Journal of Research in Personality
(2006) - et al.
Aggression questionnaire hostility scale predicts anger in response to mistreatment
Behavior Research and Therapy
(1999) A further evaluation of the aggression questionnaire: Issues of validity and reliability
Behavior Research and Therapy
(1997)- et al.
Personality types and behavioural activation and inhibition in adolescents
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006) - et al.
Personality types, coping, and stress in the Norwegian police service
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006) The limitations of extracting typologies from trait measures of personality
Personality and Individual Differences
(2004)- et al.
The revised NEO personality inventory and the MMPI-2 psychopathology five in the prediction of aggression
Personality and Individual Differences
(2001) - et al.
The Buss and Perry aggression questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies
Personality and Individual Differences
(2005) - et al.
Self-related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression. An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss–Perry aggression questionnaire
Personality and Individual Differences
(2005) - et al.
Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung [Differential psychology and personality research]
(2001)
Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and personality dimensions
European Journal of Personality
Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait-type issue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO personality inventory
European Journal of Personality
The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior
Venturing a 30-year longitudinal study
American Psychologist
Cited by (32)
Submissiveness, assertiveness and aggressiveness in school-age children: The role of self-efficacy and the Big Five
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Specifically, the results indicate that children with a hostile attitude, who experience conflict, and who have a low sense of self-control in social situations are more likely to react aggressively than are submissive children characterised by greater control in social situations and more positive attitudes towards others. Similarly, children with a negative attitude and low self-control in social situations are more likely to react aggressively than are submissive children characterised by higher control in social situations and a more positive attitude towards others (Grumm & Collani, 2009; Mofrad & Mehrabi, 2015; Xie et al., 2016). These results may also indicate that agreeableness and self-efficacy in self-control situates the schoolchildren on a continuum, where assertive children and aggressive children are at opposite ends of the continuum and submissive ones are in a central position.
Towards a synthesis of personality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits
2017, Journal of Research in PersonalityCitation Excerpt :Moreover, Gamma-Plus, Gamma-Minus, and Delta-Minus clearly correspond to the three personality types found and replicated in recent studies (Alessandri et al., 2014; Barbaranelli, 2002; Donnellan & Robins, 2010; Schnabel, Asendorph & Ostendorf, 2002), which are understood as the most widespread basic profiles of the Big Five traits. Moreover, the CPM predicts the existence of a fourth type (corresponding to Delta-Plus), which also appears in some studies (cf. Barbaranelli, 2002; Grumm & von Collani, 2009). The CPM model provides a theoretical basis for investigating personality types as the broadest personality dimensions (cf. Eysenck & Eysenck, 1985) and for consistently integrating the traditions of personality description in terms of traits and types (Strus et al., 2014a).
The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents
2016, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :As expected, adolescents who have been categorized as Resilients reported the highest scores on prosocial behavior and lowest scores on aggression. In line with a previous study (Grumm & von Collani, 2009), those in the Undercontrollers group had significantly higher aggression scores compared with those considered Resilient. Unexpectedly, the Withdrawn group, rather than the Undercontrollers group, reported the lowest scores on prosocial behaviors and the highest scores on aggression, whereas the Undercontrollers group reported relatively higher scores on both prosocial behaviors and aggression.
Personality prototypes based on dimensions of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory among prisoners and non-prisoners
2014, Personality and Individual DifferencesPersonality types during transition to young adulthood: How are they related to life situation and well-being?
2014, Journal of AdolescenceCitation Excerpt :This trait profile was a mirror image of the Resilient profile; i.e., high Neuroticism and low scores on other traits. Such a type has been identified in previous studies (e.g. Barbaranelli, 2002; Grumm & von Collani, 2009). The profile of the fourth class showed average scores on all traits and the members of this class were labeled as “Averages”.
Teacher Autonomy Support and Internalizing Problems of Adolescents from Divorced and Intact Families: Moderation by Personality Typologies
2024, Child Psychiatry and Human Development
- 1
Now at the Department of Special Education, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main.