Hope versus optimism in Singaporean adolescents: Contributions to depression and life satisfaction
Introduction
Snyder (2002) defined hope “as the perceived capacity to derive pathways to desired goals, and motivate oneself via agency thinking to use those pathways” (p. 249). However, the construct of hope overlaps with other similar constructs. The need to distinguish similar constructs from each other could not be understated. Hogan, 1994, Mayer, 1998, and Tennen and Affleck (1998) have noted the tendency of researchers to rediscover and relabel phenomena. Hence, it is important to test a relatively new but similar construct against a more established construct. One construct that should be distinguished from hope is optimism (Aspinwall and Leaf, 2002, Tennen et al., 2002). Scheier and Carver (1985) defined dispositional optimism as the “stable tendency to believe that good rather than bad things will happen” (p. 219) – generalized positive outcome expectancies about the future. Conversely, dispositional pessimism refers to generalized negative outcome expectancies about the future. Scheier and Carver (1985) believed that compared to efficacy expectancies, outcome expectancies are better predictors of behavior. In contrast, Snyder et al. (1991) emphasized the importance of the reciprocal action of efficacy expectancies and outcome expectancies, in which both types of expectancies are important and influence each other. Thus, the optimist may believe that things will turn out as he or she wants, but not possess the pathways necessary to pursue and acquire the goals (Snyder, 1995). A second difference between hope and optimism is that optimism focuses more broadly on the expected quality of future outcome in general or dispositional cognitive appraisals of personal outcomes, whereas hope focuses more directly on the personal attainment of specific goals or dispositional beliefs about personal capabilities (Bryant & Cvengros, 2004).
Dispositional optimism has been found to be negatively associated with depression (Chang, 1998a, Chang, 1998b, Dunn, 1996, Given et al., 1993, Hooker et al., 1992, Lightsey and Christopher, 1997, Marshall and Lang, 1990, Ridder et al., 2000, Scheier and Carver, 1992) and positively associated with life satisfaction (Chang, 1998a, Chang, 1998b, Chang, 2002, Curbrow et al., 1993). Similarly, researchers have reported that trait hope was negatively associated with depression (Chang, 2003, Chang and DeSimone, 2001, Kwon, 2000) and positively associated with life satisfaction (Bailey and Snyder, 2007, Chang, 1998c, Chang, 2003, Gilman et al., 2006).
Due to the conceptual and empirical similarities between optimism and hope, it would be important to test the two similar constructs within the same study in terms of how well they predict outcomes of importance. Besides conceptual overlap with optimism and other related constructs, independent reviewers have noted that the findings attributed to hope may not be unique to hope, as they have been attributed for other constructs as well, such as optimism (Aspinwall and Leaf, 2002, Tennen et al., 2002).
Of the few studies that compare hope with optimism, Anderson (1988) found that the Hope Scale contributed unique variance to mental health variables (e.g., depression and anxiety) in relation to Schedule of Life Events, Life Orientation Test, and Locus of Control Scale. He found that hope accounted for unique variance above and beyond that contributed by negative life stress, locus of control, positive life stress, and optimism. In contrast, optimism failed to account for unique variance after controlling for hope scores. Holleran and Snyder (1990) in a series of hierarchical regression analyses showed that the Hope Scale was able to predict uniquely the problem-focused coping beyond the positive expectancies measured by the Life Orientation Test and the Generalized Expectancy for Success Scale, but not vice versa. Using structural equation modeling, Bryant and Cvengros (2004) found that optimism had a stronger influence on the use of positive reappraisal as a coping strategy than did hope, whereas hope had a stronger influence on level of general self-efficacy than did optimism. More recently, agency was the strongest predictor of life satisfaction in samples of university students and adults compared to optimism, pessimism, and pathways in backwards multiple regression analyses (Bailey, Eng, Frisch, & Snyder, 2007). In sum, these studies showed that hope was generally a better predictor of psychological well being than optimism.
To date, all of the studies that have compared hope with optimism have been conducted in the United States – a Western individualistic and egalitarian society (Hofstede, 1994). In contrast, the present study focuses on Singapore – an Asian collectivistic and elitist society (Hofstede, 1994). Previous studies have shown that tertiary students from Singapore tended to report less optimism and less life satisfaction than counterparts from Australia (Wong et al., 2007). They also reported less frequent thoughts about life satisfaction and happiness than Australian or American tertiary students (Diener, 2000). Finally, Singaporean tertiary students expressed less importance about life satisfaction, but more importance about money than Australian or American tertiary students (Diener, 2000). Given the cross-cultural differences between Americans and Singaporeans, it would be informative to explore whether the results obtained from the American studies generalize to Singaporeans. This would also allow us to determine if collectivistic culture influences hope’s and optimism’s relationships with depression and life satisfaction.
The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the discriminant validity of optimism and hope in accounting for unique variance in depression and life satisfaction in an Asian sample. Specifically, it explores three interrelated research questions concerning the relationships of optimism and hope, with each other, as well as their relationships with depression and life satisfaction.
Given the conceptual similarities, a certain degree of relationship between the two constructs is expected. Gibb (1990) and Holleran and Snyder (1990) found a correlation of .60 and .50 (p < .005) between the Hope Scale and the Life Orientation Test. Hence, Hypothesis 1 states that there is a positive correlation between the two scales in this study.
According to Snyder, Sympson, Michael, and Cheavens (2001), hope may add predictive power beyond optimism because hope explicitly taps both the agency and pathways components. As mentioned previously, some past research has found that hope is a better predictor than optimism of mental health variables. Hence, Hypotheses 2A and 2B state that hope accounts for more unique variance in depression and life satisfaction relative to optimism, above and beyond those accounted for by optimism.
According to Snyder et al. (1991), the agency component taps aspects of personal efficacy expectancies, whereas the pathway component taps aspects of outcome expectancies. They proposed that unlike Bandura’s (1977) construct of self-efficacy, which emphasizes efficacy expectancies, or Scheier and Carver’s construct of dispositional optimism, which emphasizes outcome expectancies, hope construct emphasizes both types of expectancies. If the constructs of optimism and hope are conceptually different, then we would expect that each theoretical component would account for unique variance in depression and life satisfaction. Hence, we posit that Hypotheses 3A to 3H state that optimism (LOT-R subscale), pessimism (LOT-R subscale), agency (CHS subscale), and pathway (CHS subscale) components of each construct account for unique variance in depression (Hypotheses 3A to 3D) and life satisfaction (Hypotheses 3E to 3H), respectively.
Section snippets
Participants
Three hundred and thirty-four secondary students from one school volunteered in the study after being recruited through the school authorities. The distribution of male (n = 145; 43.4%) to female (n = 189; 56.6%) students was about equal. Majority of the participants was between the ages of 15 years (46.1%) and 16 years (50.6%) and the average age was 15.6 years (SD = .59). Three hundred and thirty-three of the participants were Chinese (99.7%), and there was one unidentified ethnic minority student
Descriptive statistics
The means and standard deviations of the variables used in this study are shown in Table 1. With the exception of the pessimism component, all internal consistency reliability estimates using standardized coefficient alpha shown in Table 1 were acceptable, ranging from .62 to .87.
Correlational analyses
Age was negatively correlated with optimism total scores (r = −.13, p < .05) and pessimism subscale scores (r = −.19, p < .001). Males obtained significantly higher scores on hope total scores (r = .16, p < .01), agency subscale
Discussion
The results of this study showed that multidimensional constructs like hope and optimism shared large common variance between them, and accounted for a small amount of incremental unique variance in depression and life satisfaction. First, correlational results supported Hypothesis 1 that there was a positive correlation between the two scales in the current study, but the magnitude obtained was slightly lower than those obtained by Gibb (1990) and Holleran and Snyder (1990). This means that
References (44)
Does dispositional optimism moderate the relation between perceived stress and psychological well being? A preliminary investigation
Personality and Individual Differences
(1998)- Anderson, J. R. (1988). The role of hope in appraisal, goal-setting, expectancy, and coping. Unpublished doctoral...
- et al.
In search of the unique aspects of hope: Pinning our hopes on positive emotions, future-oriented thinking, hard times, and other people
Psychological Inquiry
(2002) - et al.
Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction
The Journal of Positive Psychology
(2007) - et al.
Satisfaction with life and hope: A look at age and marital status
The Psychological Record
(2007) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change
Psychological Review
(1977)- et al.
Distinguishing hope and optimism: Two sides of a coin, or two separate coins?
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
(2004) Cultural differences in optimism, pessimism, and coping: Prediction of subsequent adjustment in Asian American and Caucasian American college students
Journal of Counseling Psychology
(1996)Dispositional optimism and primary and secondary appraisal of stressor: Controlling for confounding influences and relations to coping and psychological and physical adjustment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1998)Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice
Journal of Clinical Psychology
(1998)
Optimism–pessimism and stress appraisal: Testing a cognitive interactive model of psychological adjustment in adults
Cognitive Therapy and Research
A critical appraisal and extension of hope theory in middle-aged men and women: Is it important to distinguish agency and pathways components?
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
The influence of hope on appraisals, coping, and dysphoria: A test of hope theory
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Personal changes, dispositional optimism, and psychological adjustment to bone marrow transplantation
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
American Psychologist
The satisfaction with life scale: A measurement of life satisfaction
Journal of Personality Assessment
Well-being following amputation: Salutary effect of positive mean, optimism and control
Rehabilitation Psychology
Relative levels of hope and their relationship with academic and psychological indicators among adolescents
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
The influence of cancer patients’ symptoms and functional states on patients’ depression and family caregivers’ reaction and depression
Health Psychology
Culture and organizations: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival
Heritage has value
Dialogue: Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (127)
PolyHope: Two-level hope speech detection from tweets
2023, Expert Systems with ApplicationsEffect of Language Barriers and Use of Interpreters on Hope Among Patients With Central Nervous System Malignancies and Bone Metastases
2023, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsDetermination of life satisfaction among young women care leavers from the Ultraorthodox Jewish community
2022, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :For instance, optimistic students cope better with academic demands and report lower depression rates and higher well-being (Chang, 2001). Optimism has also been found to be a predictor of life satisfaction in many studies (e.g., Bailey et al., 2007; Wong & Lim, 2009; Yalçın, 2011). Among care leavers, optimism was found to be positively correlated with adjustment and well-being (Sulimani-Aidan et al., 2013; Van Breda & Dickens, 2017).
Hope, childhood experiences, and achievement motivation in high school students: A mixed methods study
2024, Psychology in the SchoolsIncremental Well-being Beliefs and Well-being in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Self-esteem and Optimism
2023, Child Indicators Research