Relationships between negative emotionality and attentional control in effortful control
Introduction
During the last two decades, several studies have shown that anxious and socially anxious people have directed attention to threatening stimuli (Bögels and Mansell, 2004, Williams et al., 1988). For example, in the emotional Stroop task, anxious and socially anxious people could not efficiently switch attention from the meaning of the threatening words to the color of the words (Yovel & Mineka, 2005). In addition, socially anxious people become more self-focused in social situations (Spurr & Stopa, 2002); in other words, they had difficulty in attentional shifting from the aspects of the self (e.g., own thoughts, emotions, or appearance) to external stimuli. These attentional biases would be considered to have causal effects on the vulnerability of anxiety (MacLeod et al., 2002, Mathews and MacLeod, 2002, Woody, 1996, Woody et al., 1997). MacLeod et al. (2002) showed that participants who involuntarily attended to the threatening stimuli experienced a more dysphoric mood than the other participants who did not attend to the threatening stimuli (for a review, see Kindt & van den Hout, 2001). Woody (1996) revealed that participants who were told about themselves (e.g., apparent bodily sensations, cognition, and emotions) and who intensified self-focused attention, reported feeling more anxious than the other participants who were not self-focused. These attentional biases may be due to the impairment of effortful control.
Effortful control is defined as “the ability to inhibit a dominant response to perform a subdominant response” (Rothbart & Bates, 1998, p. 137). It involves the voluntary control of behaviors and attentional processes and is used to modulate emotional experience and expression (Posner & Rothbart, 2000). The effortful control scale (EC) consists of the following three subscales: inhibitory control, activation control, and attentional control. Inhibitory control refers to the capacity to suppress inappropriate approach behavior. Activation control refers to the capacity to perform an action when there is a strong tendency to avoid it, and attentional control refers to the capacity to focus as well as to shift attention when desired. Attentional control measures the same content as the attentional control scale (ACS; Derryberry & Reed, 2002) and has the same items as the ACS. Effortful control is associated with an attentional switch in the Stroop task, and participants with a high EC score could efficiently complete the Stroop task (Yamagata, Takahashi, Shigemasu, Ono, & Kijima, 2005). Considering selective attention to threatening stimuli in the emotional Stroop task and difficulty in attentional shifting from the self in anxious people, effortful control may be related to anxiety. A previous study showed that effortful control and neuroticism, which is generally considered as an important vulnerability factor of emotional disorders (e.g., anxiety disorders), was negatively correlated (Muris, de Jong, & Engelen, 2004).
Relationships between depression and effortful control have also been indirectly investigated by focusing on internalizing problems or psychopathological symptoms. Internalizing problems in children are linked with depression (Eisenberg et al., 2001), and low effortful control is predictive of internalizing problems (Eisenberg et al., 2007). Effortful control is also negatively correlated with psychopathological symptoms, which includes symptoms of depression (Muris, 2006).
These results suggest that the impairment of effortful control is related to anxiety and depression. However, previous studies did not reveal whether low effortful control was associated with only anxiety, depression, or both, because indirect measurements include both of them. For example, internalizing problems are associated with not only anxiety but also depression (Eisenberg et al., 2001). Muris (2006) measured psychopathological symptoms related to emotional problems, which includes symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition, it is necessary to reveal the subscales of effortful control that are associated with anxiety or depression. Although internalizing problems were negatively correlated with the inhibitory control of effortful control (Kochanska et al., 1996, Lengua, 2003), this relationship is not confirmed using the EC. Since selective attention to threatening stimuli would be unique to anxiety (Mineka, Rafaeli, & Yovel, 2003), attentional control may be related to anxiety and not to depression. A previous study revealed the existence of attentional bias for threatening stimuli in high socially anxious people even when controlling for trait and state anxiety (Moriya & Tanno, 2007). Considering this result and the specific characteristics of self-focused attention, the impairment of attentional control might be unique to social anxiety.
The present study investigated the relationships between negative emotionality (i.e., social anxiety, state anxiety, and depression) and effortful control. In addition, it investigated the unique associations between negative emotionality and attentional control in the EC. We hypothesized that both social anxiety and state anxiety, or social anxiety alone would be negatively correlated with attentional control even when controlling for other negative emotionality. Further, we predicted that the depression would not be correlated with attentional control but with inhibitory control when controlling for anxiety.
Section snippets
Participants
The study involved 167 (124 males and 43 females) undergraduate students from the University of Tokyo. The average ages of males and females were 18.9 (SD = .83) and 18.6 years (SD = .70), respectively.
Brief fear of negative evaluation scale (BFNE; Leary, 1983)
The Japanese version of the BFNE (Sasagawa et al., 2004) was used to assess apprehension or distress as a result of others’ negative evaluations and to measure the degree of social anxiety. The scale comprises 12 items and uses a 5-point Likert scale. The scale has high internal consistency
Results
Table 1 shows the mean scores on each measure for all the participants. The score of attentional control for females was higher than that for males, t(165) = 2.02, p < .05. The other scores for females were as many as those for males. We did not consider the effect of gender in the next analysis of partial correlations.
Correlations between all scales are presented in Table 2. Correlations between the BFNE, STAI-S, and SDS were significant, and the subscales of EC were also positively correlated
Discussion
The present study investigated relationships between negative emotionality and effortful control. Both social anxiety and depression were associated with impaired effortful control; however, the impairment of attentional control was unique to social anxiety, and the impairment of inhibitory control and activation control was unique to depression. State anxiety was not associated with effortful control when controlling for social anxiety and depression.
The impairment of attentional control in
References (35)
- et al.
Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat?
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2003) - et al.
Attention processes in the maintenance and treatment of social phobia: Hypervigilance, avoidance and self-focused attention
Clinical Psychology Review
(2004) Associations among emotionality, self-regulation, adjustment problems, and positive adjustment in middle childhood
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
(2003)- et al.
A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1998) - et al.
The relationship between rumination, avoidance and depression in a non-clinical sample
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2007) Unique and interactive effects of neuroticism and effortful control on psychopathological symptoms in non-clinical adolescents
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006)- et al.
Relationships between neuroticism, attentional control, and anxiety disorders symptoms in non-clinical children
Personality and Individual Differences
(2004) - et al.
Avoidance and depression: The construction of the cognitive-behavioral avoidance scale
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2004) - et al.
Influencing brain networks: Implications for education
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2005) - et al.
Self-focused attention in social phobia and social anxiety
Clinical Psychology Review
(2002)
Self-focused attention in the treatment of social phobia
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Emotion-congruent attentional biases: The perspective of hierarchical models of emotional disorders
Personality and Individual Differences
Neural processing of fearful faces: Effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations
Cerebral Cortex
Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior
Child Development
Relations of effortful control, reactive undercontrol, and anger to Chinese children’s adjustment
Development and Psychopathology
Jikohyoukasiki yokuutusei syakudo no sakusei
Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica
Cited by (64)
Attention bias vs. attention control modification for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial
2024, Journal of Anxiety DisordersThe effects of social anxiety on recognition memory for social threat words: An ERP study
2022, Biological PsychologyThe neural correlates of social anxiety modulating conflict-driven cognitive control: An ERP study
2022, Neuroscience LettersAre bored minds more likely to be addicted? The relationship between boredom proneness and problematic mobile phone use
2020, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Since mobile phone has become an excellent tool to meet people’s multiple needs, such as seeking stimulation, socialization, entertainment, and acquiring information, boredom-prone college students with high/low attentional control are all likely to be attracted by mobile phone and even develop into problematic mobile phone use. Second, attentional control only measures one aspect of effortful control that involves the ability to inhibit a dominant response and activate a subdominant response (e.g., activation control, attention control, and inhibitory control) (Moriya & Tanno, 2008; Rothbart & Bates, 2006). The beneficial role of attentional control in problematic mobile phone use may depend on the overall abilities of effortful control, thus high attentional control itself may be not sufficient to reduce problematic mobile phone use for people with high boredom proneness.
Social anxiety enhances recognition of task-irrelevant threat words
2019, Acta PsychologicaTemperamental factors in remitted depression: The role of effortful control and attentional mechanisms
2018, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Given the high comorbidity between depression and anxiety (Mineka et al., 1998), these two disorders likely share important underlying mechanisms, among which self-regulation appears to be a good candidate. In keeping with this, previous literature shows that in adults effortful control and attentional mechanisms are associated not only with depression, but with anxiety symptoms as well (Kanske and Kotz, 2012; Moriya and Tanno, 2008, 2009). Hence, our third goal was to investigate if impaired effortful control and inefficient attentional mechanisms are associated with higher anxiety levels in the general population and/or RMD individuals selectively.