Relationship between perfectionism and domains of worry in a college student population: Considering the role of BIS/BAS motives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.026Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study examined whether perfectionism dimensions were unique predictors of worry when behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS) motives are also considered in the model in a sample of 254 college students. Results indicated that, although BIS/BAS motives accounted for variance in different domains of worry, perfectionism dimensions were found to account for additional variance in worry. Indeed, perfectionism dimensions were found to be more robust predictors of worry than BIS/BAS motives. Implications for the present findings with regard to future research are discussed.

Introduction

Perfectionism has become an important focus of research in recent years. Although different definitions of perfectionism have been provided (Chang, 2003), most researchers have argued that perfectionism represents a personality process variable with cognitive and behavioral properties and a form of psychopathology characterized by high personal standards involving harsh self-criticism (Frost et al., 1990, Hewitt and Flett, 1991). Indeed, studies based on college students have shown that greater perfectionism is associated with greater maladjustment, including greater depressive symptoms, suicide ideation, and greater worry (Shafran & Mansell, 2001). With regard to the study of worry, there are a number of reasons to take a closer look at its relationship with perfectionism.

First, worry itself has been linked to many indicators of psychological maladjustment in adults, including clinical anxiety, depression, and obsessionality (e.g., Brown, O’Leary, & Barlow, 1993). Moreover, within college student populations, worry has long been linked to variations in adjustment and performance (e.g., test anxiety; Flett & Blankstein, 1994). Second, although perfectionism has been examined with worry in college students (e.g., Chang, 2000, Stöber and Joormann, 2001), little is known about the associations between perfectionism and worry as multidimensional constructs. Specifically, although research on clinically dysfunctional or pathological worry has been based on unidimensional conceptualizations (e.g., Meyer, Miller, Metzger, & Borkovec, 1990), research on (non-pathological) worry in college student populations has found that this form of worry represents a multidimensional construct associated with concerns drawn from a variety of different life domains (Joormann and Stöber, 1997, Tallis et al., 1992). Indeed, based on a model of worry derived from six domains believed to represent major sources of everyday satisfaction in adults (viz., relationships, lack of confidence, aimless future, work incompetence, financial, and sociopolitical), Tallis et al. (1992) developed the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ). Research on worry using the WDQ has supported the multidimensional nature of worry, as different domains of worry have been found to have different associations with different variables. Unfortunately, most researchers have tended to focus on the total WDQ score, which does not take into account potential variations across the different life domains. Investigations looking at worry and perfectionism in college students have also been limited to use of the total WDQ score. Hence, little is known about the relationship between perfectionism and specific domains of worry in college students. Clearly, it would be important to determine if perfectionism holds different associations with different worry domains.

Third, as mentioned earlier, it is important to note that within Frost et al.’s (1990) framework, perfectionism is composed of six distinguishable dimensions, namely, concern over mistakes, personal standards, parental expectations, parental criticism, doubts about actions, organization. These dimensions are assessed by the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Frost et al., 1990). Consistent with this framework, studies using the MPS have supported the multidimensional nature of perfectionism. Unfortunately, perfectionism was measured as a global construct in the Chang (2000) study and a modified multidimensional model was used in the Stöber and Joormann (2001) study. Therefore, the identification of which specific dimensions of perfectionism are more or less strongly linked with which domains of worry remains unclear at best. Finally, although it would be important to examine these more specific relations, it is important to note that few studies have examined the extent to which perfectionism represents an important unique predictor of maladjustment beyond other useful predictors. Specifically, studies have shown that BIS/BAS motives are implicated in adult adjustment (Carver and White, 1994, Gable et al., 2000).

The behavioral activation system (BAS) and the behavioral inhibition system (BIS) have been viewed as distinct and biologically grounded systems (Reuter, Schmitz, Corr, & Hennig, 2006), that are believed to provide the basic motivational basis for individual differences in behavior, mood, and affect (Gray, 1990). BAS motives are presumed to be responsive to signals of reward, nonpunishment, and escape from punishment, and are believed to be associated with positive emotional experiences or positive affects. In contrast, BIS motives are believed to be responsive to signals of punishment, nonreward, and novelty, and are believed to be associated with negative emotional experiences or negative affects. Indeed, studies in college student populations have shown BIS/BAS motives predict positive and negative affect, respectively (e.g., Gable et al., 2000). Although BIS/BAS motives have been linked to a variety of clinical conditions (e.g., depression, pathological worry), no study has examined the relations between BIS/BAS motives and non-pathological worry in college students. For these reasons, insofar that BIS/BAS motives are believed to represent more “basic” determinants of adjustment, it would be particularly important to examine whether perfectionism remains an important predictor of worry as indicated by past research findings. To date, no study has compared the relative explanatory power of perfectionism over BIS/BAS motives in predicting psychological adjustment.

Section snippets

Purpose of the present study

With the above considerations in mind, the purpose of our present study was threefold: (a) to examine the relationship between BIS/BAS motives and multidimensional perfectionism; (b) to examine the relations of multidimensional perfectionism and BIS/BAS motives with worry; and (c) to examine the extent to which perfectionism accounts for variance in worry beyond what is accounted for by BIS/BAS motives.

Given that perfectionism is characterized as a predominately maladaptive individual

Participants

A total of 266 college students from a large-sized Midwestern university participated in the present study. All participants were enrolled in an upper division psychology course and earned course credit for participating. Ages across participants ranged from 17 to 39 years, with a mean age of 19.98 (SD = 2.94) years. Men and women were not found to differ significantly in age. Participants were predominantly European American (94.0%).

Measures

Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Frost et al., 1990).

Relations between perfectionism and BIS/BAS motives

To examine the relations between multidimensional perfectionism and BIS/BAS motives, we computed zero-order correlations. Correlations, means, standard deviations, and internal consistencies for these study measures are presented in Table 1. As the table shows, scores on BAS-D were found to be positively and significantly associated with scores on all the MPS subscales (range rs = .13–.23), indicating that drive plays a small but important role in perfectionism. For example, greater drive was

Discussion

One goal of the present study was to examine the relations between perfectionism and BIS/BAS motives. Our findings indicated that drive motives, not BIS motives, had the most consistent association with each dimension of perfectionism. This was unexpected given that BIS motives are believed to be associated with avoidance behavior and perfectionism has typically been viewed as a maladaptive construct (Frost et al., 1990). However, two points are worth noting. First, consistent with

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study expands on past research that indicated that perfectionism is associated with worry in college students. Specifically, the present study showed that beyond powerful biological predictors, namely, BIS/BAS motives, perfectionism remained an important unique predictor of non-pathological worry. Further studies are now needed to clarify and expand on these findings. For example, some have suggested alternative approaches to studying BIS/BAS motives (e.g., joint

Acknowledgement

The first author would like to thank Chang Suk-Choon and Tae Myung-Sook for their encouragement and support throughout this project.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • Perfectionism, personality, and affective experiences: New insights from revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory

    2015, Personality and Individual Differences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Third, our study focused on Hewitt and Flett's (1991) model of multidimensional perfectionism. Although this is one of the most widely-used models of perfectionism, future studies may profit from extending the present research to other models (cf. Chang et al., 2007; Kaye et al., 2008). This is the first study to explore the relations between revised RST and multidimensional perfectionism; and it is the first study to control for the substantial overlap in factors of perfection in the exploration of these relations.

  • The worried, the competitive and the indifferent-Approaches to the future in youth, their structural roots and outcomes in adult life

    2011, Futures
    Citation Excerpt :

    To further complicate matters there are also studies indicating positive effects of worry, such as improved problem solving [27]. And positive or not, according to Chang [28], perfectionists show higher levels of worry than others. However, yet other studies indicate the reverse, i.e. a negative correlation between worry and problem solving [e.g. 29].

  • The relation of behavioral inhibition and perceived parenting to maladaptive perfectionism in college students

    2011, Personality and Individual Differences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gray and McNaughton’s revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) (Gray & McNaughton, 2000; See Corr (2008) for a summary of the original and revised RST) conceptualized personality as linked to the Fight-Flight-Freeze System (FFFS) which reflects fear and avoidance in response to negative stimuli, the Behavioral Activation System (BAS) which reflects approach to positive stimuli, and the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) which reflects anxiety and risk assessment in response to goal–conflict (e.g., approach–approach, approach–avoidance). Research using the Carver and White (1994) BIS/BAS scales indicates a positive relation of the BIS scale with maladaptive perfectionism (Chang et al., 2007; O’Connor & Forgan, 2007; Randles, Flett, Nash, McGregor, & Hewitt, 2010). Although the Carver and White BIS scale reflects punishment sensitivity, including both the FFFS as well as the BIS (e.g., Beck, Smits, Claes, Vandereycken, & Bijttebier, 2009; Heym, Ferguson, & Lawrence, 2008), the findings suggest the importance of individual differences in punishment sensitivity as a predictor of maladaptive perfectionism.

  • Dimensions of perfectionism, behavioral inhibition, and rumination

    2010, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Relations between perfectionism and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Examination of specificity among the dimensions

    2009, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Different definitions of the construct of perfectionism exist, but typically it is defined as the setting of excessively high performance standards accompanied by overly critical self-evaluations (Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990). This trait-like individual difference variable has been linked to many forms of psychopathology, including but not limited to eating disorders (Bardone-Cone et al., 2007; Forbush, Heatherton, & Keel, 2007), depression (Enns & Cox, 2005; Rice & Aldea, 2006), worry (Chang et al., 2007; Santanello & Gardner, 2007), social phobia (Ashbaugh et al., 2007), anxiety sensitivity (Flett, Greene, & Hewitt, 2004), and personality disorders (Hewitt, Flett, & Turnbull, 1992). In fact, Bieling, Summerfeldt, Israeli, and Antony (2004) singled out perfectionism as a predictor of comorbidity among different forms of psychopathology.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text