Elsevier

Nursing Outlook

Volume 60, Issue 4, July–August 2012, Pages 172-181.e13
Nursing Outlook

Article
Research
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: An integrative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Behavior change interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have targeted people in community and primary care settings, health care providers, and health systems. Randomized controlled trials provide the strongest evidence of intervention efficacy. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate trials of CRC screening interventions published between 1997 and 2007 and to identify knowledge gaps and future directions for research. Thirty-three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria were evaluated using a modified version of the TREND criteria. Significant intervention effects were reported in 6 of 10 trials focused on increasing fecal occult blood testing, 4 of 7 trials focused on sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy completion, and 9 of 16 trials focused on completion of any screening test. Several effective interventions to promote CRC screening were identified. Future trials need to use theory to guide interventions, examine moderators and mediators, consistently report results, and use comparable outcome measures.

Section snippets

Procedure

We conducted computer-based searches of several literature databases—PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline/Ovid—using the following keywords: colon cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, interventions, and randomized trials. More than 500 articles were identified, of which 33 met criteria for inclusion in this review. Inclusion criteria were: (1) At least one outcome variable must have focused on CRC screening behavior; (2) at least one intervention designed to increase CRC screening test

Interventions to Promote Fecal Occult Blood Testing

Of the 10 randomized trials of interventions to promote FOBT, 9 were published since 2000 (Table 5, available online). One study focused on a predominantly male population12 and 6 included minority populations; 4 focused on African-American samples13, 14, 15, 16 and 2 on Asian/Pacific Islanders.17, 18 Two studies were conducted outside of the United States. Recruitment settings varied across studies, with 6 trials conducted in primary care settings, 2 with community-based samples, and 2 in

Discussion

We sought to update the behavioral intervention literature on CRC screening since 1997. In the decade from 1997 to 2007, significant progress was made in developing innovative and effective interventions to promote CRC screening. Although early studies focused on individual CRC screening tests, such as FOBT or FS separately, more recent studies have addressed the complexity of CRC screening by examining completion of multiple test options, including colonoscopy. The inclusion of colonoscopy as

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Phyllis Dexter, PhD, RN, Kimberly Mitchell, PhD, RN, Michelle Symms Juan, MS, RN, Laura Ladd Vodola, BSN, and Darlene Deer for their review and assistance with this manuscript.

References (54)

  • S. Pingree et al.

    The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-health interventions

    Am J Prev Med

    (2010)
  • Cancer Facts and Figures 2011

    (2011)
  • Conquering colorectal cancer: A blueprint for the future

    (2000)
  • Colorectal Cancer Facts and Figures 2008-2010

    (2008)
  • A.M. Berger et al.

    The 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2009)
  • H.I. Meissner et al.

    Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2006)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HealthyPeople 2020 plan....
  • B. Levin et al.

    Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2008)
  • S.W. Vernon

    Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1997)
  • Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, et al. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer...
  • C.N. Klabunde et al.

    The role of primary care physicians in cancer care

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2009)
  • D.C. Des Jarlais et al.

    Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement

    Am J Public Health

    (2004)
  • L.C. Friedman et al.

    Compliance with fecal occult blood test screening among low-income medical outpatients: a randomized controlled trial using a videotaped intervention

    J Cancer Educ

    (2001)
  • D.P. Miller et al.

    Using a computer to teach patients about fecal occult blood screening. A randomized trial

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2005)
  • B.D. Powe et al.

    An intervention study to increase colorectal cancer knowledge and screening among community elders

    Public Health Nurs

    (2004)
  • S.P. Tu et al.

    Promoting culturally appropriate colorectal cancer screening through a health educator: a randomized controlled trial

    Cancer

    (2006)
  • R. Courtier et al.

    Participation in a colorectal cancer screening programme: influence of the method of contacting the target population

    Eur J Cancer Prev

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text