Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 135, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 371-383
Neuroscience

Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.063Get rights and content

Abstract

The generation of accurate motor commands requires implicit knowledge of both limb and environmental dynamics. The action of gravity on moving limb segments must be taken into account within the motor command, and may affect the limb trajectory chosen to accomplish a given motor task. Exactly how the CNS deals with these gravitoinertial forces remains an open question. Does the CNS measure gravitational forces directly, or are they accommodated in the motor plan by way of internal models of physical laws? In this study five male subjects participated. We measured kinematic and dynamic parameters of upward and downward arm movements executed at two different speeds, in both normal Earth gravity and in the weightless conditions of parabolic flight. Exposure to microgravity affected velocity profiles for both directions and speeds. The shape of velocity profiles (the ratio of maximum to mean velocity) and movement duration both showed transient perturbations initially in microgravity, but returned to normal gravity values with practice in 0×g. Differences in relative time to peak velocity between upward versus downward movements, persisted for all trial performed in weightlessness. These differences in kinematic profiles and in the torque profiles used to produce them, diminished, however, with practice in 0×g. These findings lead to the conclusion that the CNS explicitly represents gravitational and inertial forces in the internal models used to generate and execute arm movements. Furthermore, the results suggest that the CNS adapts motor plans to novel environments on different time scales; dynamics adapt first to reproduce standard kinematics, and then kinematics patterns are adapted to optimize dynamics.

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

Data presented in this study were taken from experiments made in a normal gravitational environment (1×g) and in microgravity (0×g); the latter achieved during parabolic flights. The experiments were performed on three flights executed on each of three successive flight days. Flights were composed of 30 parabolas, each consisting of three successive phases with respect to normal gravity: i) hypergravity ∼1.8×g, ii) microgravity, ∼0×g and iii) hypergravity ∼1.8×g. Each phase lasted ∼20–25 s, the

General characteristics

Fig. 1 shows stick diagrams of the upper arm and forearm during upward motion, and the paths of the fingertip in the sagittal plan for the two movement directions and speeds conditions in both normal and microgravity environments. Prior to the onset of an upward movement, subjects upper arm elevation was ∼30° and elbow anatomical angle was ∼120° and prior to the onset of a downward movement upper arm elevation was ∼90° and elbow anatomical angle was ∼125°. Fingertip paths were curved with

Discussion

Both short-lived perturbations with rapid re-adaptation and long-term quasi-permanent alterations in hand kinematics were observed over the course of the experiment for each of the participating subjects. These observations provide insight into how the CNS treats gravitational and inertial forces in the planning and execution of point-to-point arm movements.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales).

References (32)

  • J. Fisk et al.

    Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control

    J Neurophysiol

    (1993)
  • J.R. Flanagan et al.

    The role of internal models in motion planning and controlevidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads

    J Neurosci

    (1997)
  • M. Flanders et al.

    Two components of muscle activationscaling with the speed of arm movement

    J Neurophysiol

    (1992)
  • T. Flash et al.

    The coordination of arm movementsan experimentally confirmed mathematical model

    J Neurosci

    (1985)
  • C.M. Harris et al.

    Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning

    Nature

    (1998)
  • I. Kingma et al.

    Object size effects on initial lifting forces under microgravity conditions

    Exp Brain Res

    (1999)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Physiological performance and capabilities

      2018, Space Safety and Human Performance
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text