Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 48, Issue 6, May 2010, Pages 1644-1651
Neuropsychologia

Coherent motion processing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD): An fMRI study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.007Get rights and content

Abstract

A deficit in global motion processing caused by a specific dysfunction of the visual dorsal pathway has been suggested to underlie perceptual abnormalities in subjects with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, the neural mechanisms associated with abnormal motion processing in ASD remain poorly understood. We investigated brain responses related to the detection of coherent and random motion in 15 male subjects with ASD and 15 age- and IQ-matched healthy controls (aged 13–19 years) using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Behaviorally, no significant group differences were observed between subjects with ASD and controls. Neurally, subjects with ASD showed increased brain activation in the left primary visual cortex across all conditions compared with controls. A significant interaction effect between group and condition was observed in the right superior parietal cortex resulting from increased neural activity in the coherent compared with the random motion conditions only in the control group. In addition, neural activity in area V5 was not differentially modulated by specific motion conditions in subjects with ASD. Functional connectivity analyses revealed positive correlations between the primary visual cortex and area V5 within both hemispheres, but no significant between-group differences in functional connectivity patterns along the dorsal stream. The data suggest that motion processing in ASD results in deviant activations in both the lower and higher processing stages of the dorsal pathway. This might reflect differences in the perception of visual stimuli in ASD, which possibly result in impaired integration of motion signals.

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by impairments in social communication and interaction as well as repetitive, stereotyped behaviors. An additional non-social feature of autism is sensory abnormality (Rogers & Ozonoff, 2005). Heightened sensitivity to small differences between stimuli, increased attention to fragments or surface features of objects, and a relative failure to extract the information context have been described frequently in autistic individuals (Dakin and Frith, 2005, Hill and Frith, 2003). This information processing style, characterized by favoring local over global feature aspects, is specific to autism (Bertone & Faubert, 2006) and could explain both impaired and superior perceptual processing in ASD (Happé & Frith, 2006).

Recently, there has been a growing interest in low-level perceptual processing in ASD especially in the visual domain, but the neural basis of these abnormalities is still unknown. Furthermore, different theories suggest that abnormal visual processing in ASD is characterized by an integration deficit at an early stage of visual processing and/or a dysfunction of the visual pathways (Bertone et al., 2005, Davis et al., 2006, Happé and Frith, 2006).

The visual system beyond the primary visual cortex segregates into at least two streams, the dorsal and ventral pathways, each of which processes and transmits the information about objects and events in different ways and for different purposes (Goodale and Milner, 1992, Livingstone and Hubel, 1987). The ventral stream projects from the primary visual cortex to area V4 to the inferotemporal cortex. It is mainly responsible for the perceptual identification of objects, and it receives input from the parvocellular system for high spatial frequencies. The dorsal pathway on the other hand projects from the striate cortex to the middle temporal area (MT/V5) to the posterior parietal cortex. It receives input mainly from the magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), which are sensitive to low spatial frequencies, and it plays an important role in the localization of visual stimuli and the control of object-related actions towards an object (Goodale and Milner, 1992, Milner and Goodale, 2008). Notably, the cells in the dorsal stream, especially in MT/V5, are highly responsive to motion stimuli (Culham et al., 2001, Tootell et al., 1995). A classical psychophysical task for investigating the function of this pathway is coherent motion detection (Braddick et al., 2001, Newsome and Pare, 1988), in which the perception threshold of an observer is measured by determining the lowest proportion of dots that is needed to correctly identify the direction of coherent motion in a stimulus patch (Dakin & Frith, 2005). Functional imaging studies have shown that in healthy subjects, coherent motion stimuli compared with static or random motion stimuli, activate the specialized motion-sensitive area MT/V5 along with other occipital and parietal areas (Braddick et al., 2001, Culham et al., 2001).

In autism, several behavioral studies have reported increased motion coherence thresholds or motion-processing deficits, although this pattern could not consistently be replicated across all studies (Del Viva et al., 2006, Milne et al., 2006, Vandenbroucke et al., 2008b), in particular no group differences were found if IQ differences were controlled (Koldewyn, Whitney, & Rivera, 2009). At the neural level, a disturbed dorsal pathway for motion processing, despite an intact ventral pathway for form processing, has been suggested to reflect a dorsal stream vulnerability in neurodevelopmental disorders (Braddick, Atkinson, & Wattam-Bell, 2003). Furthermore, Milne et al. (2002) interpreted abnormally high motion coherence thresholds in relation to the local processing bias in ASD by postulating that both are a consequence of low levels of activity in the low spatial frequency channels of the magnocellular pathway, which possibly lead to abnormal development of the parietal lobe. Contrary to this hypothesis, other researchers have reported intact lower level dorsal stream functioning (processed in the primary visual cortex) and suggested that second-order or coherent motion-processing deficits in autism stem from a higher order deficit in the integration of ‘complex’ information at the global level instead of a motion-processing deficit per se (Bertone et al., 2003, Pellicano et al., 2005). Hence, the motion-sensitive area V5 might be responsible for increased motion thresholds in ASD. This region is crucial for motion processing in the brain, and at this stage, local directional signals are combined to form a global percept, which involves additional cooperative mechanisms in the cortex (Braddick et al., 2001). Furthermore, neural responses in V5 have shown a linear dependence on increasing coherence levels (Rees, Friston, & Koch, 2000).

Recently, it has also been suggested that perceptual deficits in ASD are not only due to dysfunctions within a specific pathway or region but are rather related to reduced connectivity between distant brain regions that might lead to a reduced top–down modulation of lower level sensory processing (Just et al., 2007, Just et al., 2004, Koshino et al., 2005, Villalobos et al., 2005), but non-replications are puzzling (for review: Muller, 2008). Thus, the exact neural mechanism underlying deficits in motion processing have yet to be elucidated. In particular, it remains unclear at which stage of information processing deficits occurs.

In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we used a coherent motion detection task that reliably activates the dorsal visual stream to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying abnormal motion processing in ASD in comparison with a healthy control group. This kind of task exemplifies early neurointegrative processing and is mediated mainly by area MT/V5, which is a specialized motion-sensitive region in extrastriate cortex (Braddick et al., 2001). On the basis of behavioral coherent motion studies in ASD, we hypothesized that the neural activity of the motion-sensitive region MT/V5 is abnormal in subjects with ASD compared with controls. Since previous neuroimaging studies in autism also reported increased activation in early visuo-perceptual processing areas (Manjaly et al., 2007), but reduced neural activity in “higher order” cortical regions (Mottron, Dawson, Soulieres, Hubert, & Burack, 2006), we conducted a whole-brain imaging analysis to examine the extent to which higher order or early perceptual differences are involved in abnormal visual processing in ASD. Moreover, the functional connectivity among activated areas of the dorsal motion pathway were investigated to further test the hypothesis that deficits in the integration of complex information in ASD are associated with abnormal coupling between these brain regions.

Section snippets

Subjects

Fifteen male adolescents with ASD and 15 male healthy controls, all aged between 13 and 19 years with a full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) above 80, were included in the present study. There were no significant differences between groups in the FSIQ, the verbal IQ (VIQ) or age, but the performance IQ (PIQ) differed significantly between the groups (Table 1). One participant in the autism group and two in the control group were left-handed; all other subjects were right-handed. An

Imaging data

The data were analyzed using a general linear model as implemented in SPM5. Each experimental condition was modeled using an event-related reference vector convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function and its first-order temporal and dispersion derivative. Low-frequency signal drifts were filtered using a cutoff period of 128 s. Parameter estimates were subsequently calculated for each voxel using weighted least squares to provide maximum likelihood estimators based on the temporal

Behavioral data

Fifteen control and 14 ASD subjects participated in the motion detection threshold task outside the scanner. An analysis of covariance with performance IQ as a covariate revealed no significant group differences between the two groups (control: mean: 6.88 ± 1.83; ASD: mean: 7.13 ± 2.44; F(1,26) = 0.349, p = .56).

For the behavioral data of the fMRI experiment, a 2 × 2 analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with “GROUP” (ASD and healthy subjects (CON)) as a between-subject factor, “MOTION” (random and coherent

Discussion

The present study investigated the neural mechanism of coherent motion perception in participants with autism spectrum disorder. We hypothesized abnormal neural activity in the dorsal stream in autistic subjects. Indeed, our data revealed significant between-group differences in neural activation between healthy control subjects and participants with ASD at different processing stages of the dorsal pathway, including increased neural activity in the primary visual cortex, unmodulated activation

Financial disclosures

Dr. Herpertz-Dahlmann is a consultant for Eli Lilly and has received industry research funding from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Janssen Cilag. The other authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all our volunteers and our colleagues at the Institute of Neuroscience and Biophysics, Department of Medicine, Research Center Juelich. Furthermore we wish to thank Andre Knops for his support in programming the experiment and Ralph Weidner for his helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was supported by a grant to K.K. and G.R.F. by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF N68a).

References (57)

  • J. Kaufman et al.

    Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • H. Koshino et al.

    Functional connectivity in an fMRI working memory task in high-functioning autism

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • Z.M. Manjaly et al.

    Neurophysiological correlates of relatively enhanced local visual search in autistic adolescents

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • J.P. McCleery et al.

    Abnormal magnocellular pathway visual processing in infants at risk for autism

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • A.D. Milner et al.

    Two visual systems re-viewed

    Neuropsychologia

    (2008)
  • K. Murphy et al.

    Artifactual fMRI group and condition differences driven by performance confounds

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • E. Pellicano et al.

    Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence?

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • M.E. Villalobos et al.

    Reduced functional connectivity between V1 and inferior frontal cortex associated with visuomotor performance in autism

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • A. Bartels et al.

    Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2008)
  • A. Bertone et al.

    Demonstrations of decreased sensitivity to complex motion information not enough to propose an autism-specific neural etiology

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2006)
  • A. Bertone et al.

    Motion perception in autism: A ‘complex’ issue

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • A. Bertone et al.

    Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial information processing in autism depends on stimulus complexity

    Brain

    (2005)
  • S. Boelte et al.

    An fMRI-study of locally oriented perception in autism: Altered early visual processing of the block design test

    Journal of Neural Transmission

    (2008)
  • O.J. Braddick et al.

    Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion

    Perception

    (2001)
  • J.C. Culham et al.

    Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1998)
  • R.A.O. Davis et al.

    Subjective perceptual distortions and visual dysfunction in children with autism

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2006)
  • C. Delmo et al.
  • Cited by (50)

    • Extracting BOLD signals based on time-constrained multiset canonical correlation analysis for brain functional network estimation and classification

      2022, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the correlation of spontaneous fluctuations in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals was first observed (Biswal et al., 1995), there has been a steady increase in the interest to investigate the resting-state brain functional network (BFN). In recent years, BOLD-based BFN plays an increasingly important role in the growing field of identifying brain disorders, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Morris and Cummings, 2005; Martinez and Peplow, 2019; Li et al., 2020) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Wang et al., 2019; Brieber et al., 2010; Li et al., 2017). BOLD-based BFN can be estimated in voxel-wise and region of interest (ROI)-wise manners.

    • Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children

      2015, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Impairments in global motion perception due to abnormal visual cortex development have been reported in adults with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia (Simmers & Bex, 2004; Simmers, Ledgeway, Hess, & McGraw, 2003; Simmers, Ledgeway, Mansouri, Hutchinson, & Hess, 2006) and children with deprivation amblyopia (Ellemberg, Lewis, Maurer, Brar, & Brent, 2002). Furthermore, in support of the dorsal stream vulnerability hypothesis, impaired global motion perception has been observed in children with William’s syndrome (Atkinson et al., 1997), dyslexia (Raymond & Sorensen, 1998), autism (Brieber et al., 2010; Manning & Charman, 2015; Manning, Charman, & Pellicano, 2013) a history of preterm birth (Taylor, Jakobson, Maurer, & Lewis, 2009), and fetal alcohol syndrome (Gummel, Ygge, Benassi, & Bolzani, 2012). However, not all neurodevelopmental studies report visual deficits that are consistent with the dorsal stream vulnerability hypothesis (Bertone & Faubert, 2006; Bertone, Mottron, Jelenic, & Faubert, 2003).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text