Brief communicationHaptic perception after a change in hand size
Section snippets
Participants
Fifty-six members of the University of Liverpool student population took part in the study (mean age 21 years). Half were assigned to the synchronous condition and half to the a synchronous condition. They were unaware of the hypothesis under investigation.
Materials
We cast two pairs of hands from alginate molds of real hands (Fig. 1), selected to be approximately at the 5th and 95th percentiles of male and female hand sizes, respectively. Therefore, they were within the range of anatomically plausible
Participant hand sizes
As a measure of hand size we used the linear extent between the base of the palm and the tip of the middle finger. The hand replicas for the female group were 142 and 185 cm, whereas those for the male group were 165 and 205 cm. The distribution of the hand sizes in the two participant groups are summarized by the boxplots in Fig. 1. All participant hands were indeed within the range of small and large hand replicas. Because there were individual differences in hand size, we expect differences in
Conclusion
In our experiment, participants were exposed to multisensory stimulation that led them to report (in a questionnaire) that an enlarged or reduced hand replica had become their own hand (the fake-hand illusion, Botvinick & Cohen, 1998). Immediately after stimulation, they judged an actively felt object to be larger (after exposure to the enlarged hand) or smaller (after exposure to the reduced hand) than a standard object of identical size felt by the other hand. Therefore, a short exposure to
References (17)
- et al.
Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception
Current Biology
(2005) - et al.
Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self
Consciousness and Cognition
(2008) - et al.
On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space
Behavioural Brain Research
(2008) - et al.
Seeing the hand boosts feeling on the cheek
Cortex
(2009) - et al.
An integrated system for dextrous manipulation
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
(1989) - et al.
Representation of object size in the somatosensory system
Journal of Neurophysiology
(2006) - et al.
Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see
Nature
(1998) Observations on active touch
Psychological Review
(1962)
Cited by (55)
From rubber hands to neuroprosthetics: Neural correlates of embodiment
2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsExploring the development of high-level contributions to body representation using the rubber hand illusion and the monkey hand illusion
2022, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, tasks that compare the body with external stimuli may also dissociate from and develop differently than what is recorded using proprioceptive drift measures. Indeed, another study that implemented the RHI over different hand sizes in adults and found similar recalibration of the hand for both large and small fake hands also used a task comparing the body with external stimuli (Bruno & Bertamini, 2010). In that study, participants needed to estimate the diameter of a disk relative to a reference disk using only haptics, which was found to be modulated by induction of the RHI over a small hand and a large hand.
Representation and perception of the body in space
2021, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience: Second EditionIf I were a grown-up: Children's response to the rubber hand illusion with different hand sizes
2019, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyCitation Excerpt :These findings corroborate the plasticity of bodily self-consciousness across development; however, a more in-depth investigation of the interplay between changes (or stability) in body size representation and related perception of external objects in children could provide a better understanding of the relationship between body size representation and bodily self-consciousness. A similar approach has already been applied in research with adults by asking participants to complete perceptual tasks following the RHI (Bruno & Bertamini, 2010; Haggard & Jundi, 2009; Kilteni, Normand, Sanchez-Vives, & Slater, 2012; Pavani & Zampini, 2007) or its full body equivalent (full body illusion; Banakou et al., 2013; Normand et al., 2011; Tajadura-Jiménez et al., 2017; van der Hoort et al., 2011). Bruno and Bertamini (2010) found that, after exposure to the RHI using an enlarged or smaller fake hand (with respect to the size of participants’ own hand), participants reported objects to be larger or smaller, respectively.
The influence of vision, touch, and proprioception on body representation of the lower limbs
2018, Acta PsychologicaPeople watching: The perception of the relative body proportions of the self and others
2017, CortexCitation Excerpt :However, if the hand is also experienced as much smaller than the forearm, then an object placed on the hand must be relatively smaller than an object placed on the forearm. Indeed, the tactile size perception of objects increases when the rubber hand illusion is used to make individuals feel as if their hand is larger (Bruno & Bertamini, 2010) or when a part of the body is visually magnified (Taylor-Clarke et al., 2004). In support of reverse distortion, when comparing a body part to a non-corporal object, these distortions become severely reduced in magnitude (Linkenauger et al., 2015).