Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 48, Issue 2, January 2010, Pages 558-565
Neuropsychologia

Interactions between cognition and motivation during response inhibition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.017Get rights and content

Abstract

A growing number of studies have investigated how motivation interacts with particular cognitive functions, including attention, working memory, and other executive functions. In these studies, the emphasis has been on understanding how motivation impacts brain regions that contribute to improving behavioral performance. Less is understood about how positive incentives may actually impair behavioral performance. Here, we were interested in investigating a situation in which reward would be potentially deleterious to behavioral performance. Specifically, we hypothesized that rewarding participants for correct going would impair stopping performance. Critically, we hypothesized that the effects on inhibition would be specific, namely, not simply attributable to a speeding-up of reaction time during go trials. To investigate the interaction between inhibition and motivation, participants performed a stop-signal task during two conditions, namely, during a neutral, control condition and during a rewarded condition during which they were rewarded for correct go performance. Behaviorally, participants exhibited longer stop-signal reaction times during the reward relative to the control condition, indicating that it was harder to inhibit their responses during the former condition. Neuroimaging findings revealed that a host of brain regions were involved in stop-signal inhibition, as indexed via the contrast of successful and unsuccessful stop trials. Critically, a subset of these regions, which included the right inferior frontal gyrus, the left precentral gyrus, and bilateral putamen, exhibited significant inhibition by condition interactions, demonstrating that cognitive and motivational signals interact in the brain during inhibitory control.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirty-five volunteers (22 ± 3 years old; 19 females) participated in the study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Indiana University, Bloomington. Subjects were recruited based on responses to flyers posted on different message boards at the Bloomington campus. All subjects were in good health with no past history of psychiatric or neurological disease as assessed by a brief neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) (Sheehan et al., 1998). All participants had normal or

Behavioral results

Behavioral results are summarized in Table 1. A small improvement in behavioral accuracy was observed for go performance. Go error rate was 2.3% during the control condition and 1.5% during the reward condition (p < .01; Wilcoxon signed rank test). However, no significant differences were observed in the case of reaction time (control: 487.1 ms; reward: 484.0 ms; t(33) = .71, p = .48). As expected, because of the staircasing procedure, stop performance was approximately 50% correct during both

Discussion

In this paper, we investigated the interaction between inhibition and motivation. To do so, participants performed a stop-signal task during two conditions, namely, during a neutral, control condition and during a motivated condition during which they were rewarded for correct go performance. Behaviorally, participants exhibited longer SSRTs during the reward relative to the control condition, indicating that it was harder to inhibit their responses during the former condition. Our neuroimaging

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback and Andrew Bauer for assistance with figures. Support for this work was provided in part by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH071589) and the Indiana METACyt Initiative of Indiana University, funded in part through a major grant from the Lilly Endowment Inc.

References (62)

  • M. Jenkinson et al.

    A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images

    Medical Image Analysis

    (2001)
  • C.S. Li et al.

    Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: Neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2008)
  • P. Nachev et al.

    The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action

    Neuroimage

    (2007)
  • L. Pessoa

    How do emotion and motivation direct executive function?

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2009)
  • K. Rubia et al.

    An fMRI study of reduced left prefrontal activation in schizophrenia during normal inhibitory function

    Schizophrenia Research

    (2001)
  • K. Rubia et al.

    Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • L. Tamm et al.

    Event-related FMRI evidence of frontotemporal involvement in aberrant response inhibition and task switching in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • F. Verbruggen et al.

    Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2008)
  • R.M. Alderson et al.

    Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2007)
  • A.R. Aron

    The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control

    Neuroscientist

    (2007)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • C.N. Boehler et al.

    Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2009)
  • L. Boucher et al.

    Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades

    Psychological Reviews

    (2007)
  • M. Brass et al.

    Neural correlates of overcoming interference from instructed and implemented stimulus-response associations

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • T.S. Braver et al.

    Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control

  • B.J. Casey et al.

    A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • C.D. Chambers et al.

    Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Impaired inhibitory control in recreational cocaine users

    Public Library of Science ONE

    (2007)
  • Cited by (131)

    • Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations

      2022, Acta Psychologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Extending these previous findings to DT situations, it is conceivable that the application of reward leads to a reduction of the perceptual stage due to increased perceptual sensitivity. Consequently, the perception of the stimulus is conducted faster and the subsequent stages can start earlier reducing RTs (Engelmann et al., 2009; Engelmann & Pessoa, 2014; Padmala & Pessoa, 2010, 2011; Pessoa & Engelmann, 2010). However, there have also been hints that the response selection stage might be affected by the application of reward (Etzel, Cole, Zacks, Kay, & Braver, 2016; Kennerley & Wallis, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text