Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 57, Issue 1, 1 July 2011, Pages 206-213
NeuroImage

Repeated pain induces adaptations of intrinsic brain activity to reflect past and predict future pain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed a persistent architecture of intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in the signal of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of humans and other species. ICNs are characterized by coherent ongoing activity between distributed brain regions during rest, in the absence of externally oriented behavior. While these networks strongly reflect anatomical connections, the relevance of ICN activity for human behavior remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether intrinsic brain activity adapts to repeated pain and encodes an individual's experience. Healthy subjects received a short episode of heat pain on 11 consecutive days. Across this period, subjects either habituated or sensitized to the painful stimulation. This adaptation was reflected in plasticity of a sensorimotor ICN (SMN) comprising pain related brain regions: coherent intrinsic activity of the somatosensory cortex retrospectively mirrored pain perception; on day 11, intrinsic activity of the prefrontal cortex was additionally synchronized with the SMN and predicted whether an individual would experience more or less pain during upcoming stimulation. Other ICNs of the intrinsic architecture remained unchanged. Due to the ubiquitous occurrence of ICNs in several species, we suggest intrinsic brain activity as an integrative mechanism reflecting accumulated experiences.

Research highlights

► Repeated pain changes coherent intrinsic brain activity of a sensorimotor network. ► Activity in somatosensory cortex retrospectively codes recent pain perception. ► Prefrontal cortex predicts upcoming pain intensity on the basis of previous pain.

Introduction

Traditionally, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have investigated changes of brain activity in response to sensory, motor or cognitive tasks that subjects performed in the MR scanner. Only recently, colleagues have revealed networks of distributed brain regions that are characterized by coherent ongoing activity in subjects at rest, in the absence of any observable behavior (Biswal et al., 1995, Greicius et al., 2003, Laufs et al., 2003, Damoiseaux et al., 2006, Fox and Raichle, 2007). These resting-state or intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) strongly resemble previously described task-activation patterns (Smith et al., 2009). However, the relevance of ICNs for human behavior remains a controversial issue.

ICNs transcend levels of consciousness and consistently occur in humans, monkeys and rats (Lu et al., 2007, Vincent et al., 2007, Greicius et al., 2008, Larson-Prior et al., 2009, Biswal et al., 2010). The ubiquity and robustness of the intrinsic functional architecture strongly supports the notion of ICNs reflecting underlying structural connectivity (Fox and Raichle, 2007, Hagmann et al., 2008, Honey et al., 2009). But there have also been reports of immediate variations in the coherence of ICNs associated with task performance of humans (Fox et al., 2007, Seeley et al., 2007, Albert et al., 2009, Lewis et al., 2009). We therefore hypothesize that at least portions of ICN activity continuously adapt with ongoing experiences and that intrinsic brain activity reflects past and anticipates future experiences.

In this study, we focused on repeated pain experiences and their relation to ICN activity before and after pain. More concretely, we asked whether recurring pain modulates functional connectivity (FC) within pain-relevant ICNs in a way that reflects recent pain and enables the prediction of future pain experiences. FC is a measure to quantify the strength of covarying activity between distributed voxels or brain regions. We derived ICNs by applying Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data. Acute pain is consistently associated with neuronal activity in a distinct network of subcortical and cortical brain regions (Apkarian et al., 2005, Tracey and Mantyh, 2007). Among these, somatosensory cortices (SSC) process sensory aspects of pain, while the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has been associated with its modulation (Koyama et al., 2005, Seymour et al., 2005). Despite our knowledge about activating these brain regions by acute pain, less is known about their role in encoding past and future pain. Yet, understanding how the brain processes pain beyond an immediate experience might help to explain the development of chronic pain conditions.

Section snippets

Participants

Thirteen healthy male volunteers without any history of neurological, psychiatric or pain disease participated in this study. All participants received detailed information about the experimental procedures, were free to withdraw from the study at any time, and gave written informed consent. The Ethics Committee of the university hospital “Klinikum Rechts der Isar” (Technische Universitaet Muenchen) approved the protocols of the study. The data of an additional group of 16 healthy subjects that

Results

Healthy volunteers received a short episode of noxious heat stimulation to their right forearm and subsequently rated the perceived pain intensity. We repeated this procedure on 11 consecutive days and recorded 6 min of rs-fMRI before (PREpain) and after (POSTpain) painful stimulation on the initial and last day of the study (Fig. 1A).

Discussion

In this study, we found that coherent ongoing activity between pain processing brain regions in the resting state changes with repeatedly experienced pain. Within the SMN, FC of the somatosensory system reflected retrospective coding of recent pain, while activity in the vmPFC anticipated forthcoming pain of a repeatedly experienced episode.

Acknowledgments

Valentin Riedl wishes to thank Karl Friston, Olaf Sporns, Walter Zieglgaensberger, Tom Eichele, Christopher Honey and Markus Ploner for advice and discussions and Christine Vogg for technical assistance. Supported by the 01EV0710 grant and the “German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain” (DFNS) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) and by the SFB391C9 grant of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG).

References (49)

  • S. Ohara et al.

    Analysis of synchrony demonstrates “pain networks” defined by rapidly switching, task-specific, functional connectivity between pain-related cortical structures

    Pain

    (2006)
  • A. Ploghaus et al.

    Neural circuitry underlying pain modulation: expectation, hypnosis, placebo

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2003)
  • I. Tracey et al.

    The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • M. Valet et al.

    Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain—an fMRI analysis

    Pain

    (2004)
  • M.C. Albanese et al.

    Memory traces of pain in human cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • M.N. Baliki et al.

    Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain

    J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • M.N. Baliki et al.

    Beyond feeling: chronic pain hurts the brain, disrupting the default-mode network dynamics

    J. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • C.F. Beckmann et al.

    Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2005)
  • A.J. Bell et al.

    An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution

    Neural Comput.

    (1995)
  • B. Biswal et al.

    Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1995)
  • B.B. Biswal et al.

    Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2010)
  • M. Boly et al.

    Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: how conscious is the default mode of brain function?

    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • V.D. Calhoun et al.

    A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2001)
  • J.S. Damoiseaux et al.

    Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Associations of Regional and Network Functional Connectivity With Exercise-Induced Low Back Pain

      2021, Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      We also found that lower levels of DOMS-related pain were predictive of greater connectivity between the cerebellar network and bilateral pre- and postcentral gyri, as well as greater connectivity between left middle occipital gyrus and cerebellar lobule VI. A mechanistic role for the cerebellum in susceptibility to DOMS-related pain is consistent with both its canonical role in motor processing and its increasingly recognized contributions to sensorimotor integration, cognition, and emotion processing.37 Indeed, previous literature has identified the cerebellum to be an important region for central pain processing and endogenous pain modulation25,33 and structural alterations of the cerebellum have been associated with chronic musculoskeletal conditions.39

    • Increased functional connectivity in gambling disorder correlates with behavioural and emotional dysregulation: Evidence of a role for the cerebellum

      2020, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This value is indeed strictly related to the MRI scanner we used since it is the lowest TR that allowed a whole brain fMRI scan with the reported acquisition parameters. Although a shorter TR could provide a larger temporal resolution, other published articles used this TR value with a 1.5 T scanner [59,60]. Even with these limitations, we obtained a valid representation of the neural networks most commonly reported in the literature, supporting the validity of our study.

    • Data-driven tensor independent component analysis for model-based connectivity neurofeedback

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tensor ICA could aid in the definition of the brain network models and (anti)correlated brain areas/patterns for functional connectivity neurofeedback estimates; for example, it could indicate and limit the number of nodes for complex network models and pair-wise functional (anti)correlations under investigation. It has been shown that the preceding experimental task might modulate the subsequent resting-state activity (Buckner et al., 2008; Waites et al., 2005), such as in emotional (Eryilmaz et al., 2011), motor (Albert et al., 2009), visual learning (Lewis et al., 2009; Urner et al., 2013), memory (Deuker et al., 2013; Stevens et al., 2010; Tambini et al., 2010) and pain (Riedl et al., 2011) experiments. In line with these findings, resting-state activity has been reported to predict neurofeedback success (Scheinost et al., 2014) and to be modulated by neurofeedback training (Harmelech et al., 2013; Megumi et al., 2015; Ramot et al., 2017; Young et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text