Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 54, Issue 1, 1 January 2011, Pages 90-102
NeuroImage

Human brain connectivity during single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.056Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF) in the human motor cortex can be measured using a paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) protocol. Recently, a technical device has been introduced, which allows recording electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to TMS of a given scalp site. The latency, amplitude and scalp topography of such responses are considered a reflection of cortico-cortical connectivity and functional state. The aim of the present study is to better characterize the neuronal circuits underlying motor cortex connectivity as well as the mechanisms regulating its balance between inhibition and facilitation by means of EEG navigated-ppTMS coregistration.

Methods

Sub-threshold and supra-threshold single and ppTMS of the left primary motor cortex were carried out during a multi-channel EEG recording on 8 healthy volunteers; the between-pulse intervals used in the paired pulse trials were 3 (for SICI) and 11 ms (for ICF). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the opposite hand were simultaneously recorded.

Results

Single and ppTMS induced EEG responses characterized by a sequence of negative deflections peaking at approximately 7, 18, 44, 100 and 280 ms alternated with positive peaks at approximately 13, 30, 60 and 190 ms post-TMS. Moreover, ppTMS modulated both EEG evoked activity and MEPs. Amplitude variability of EEG responses was correlated with – and therefore might partially explain – amplitude variability of MEPs.

Interpretation

EEG-ppTMS is a promising tool to better characterize the neuronal circuits underlying cortical effective connectivity as well as the mechanisms regulating the balance between inhibition and facilitation within the human cortices and the corticospinal pathway.

Introduction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique that allows the investigation of the functional state of the cerebral cortex. In TMS the excitation of neurons in deep gray matter can be either direct or indirect through volleys from superficial neurons (Barker et al., 1985). Adequate stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) evokes indirect excitation of pyramidal neurons via local inter-neurons with higher probability than direct excitation (Amassian and Cracco, 1987). The volley along the corticospinal pathway can elicit electromyographic (EMG) responses, termed motor evoked potentials (MEPs), in the target muscles contra-lateral to the side of the stimulation (Hallett, 2000), thus providing a reliable, but indirect, measure of pyramidal tract excitability as well as its cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical connections. Amplitudes and latencies of MEPs are parameters resulting from a combination of excitatory and inhibitory events occurring in a complex synaptic network at different neural levels along the motor pathway (Ferreri et al., 2003, Rossini and Rossi, 2007), although the relative contribution of these events is far from being fully elucidated. Paired pulse TMS techniques (ppTMS; Kujirai et al., 1993) include a well-known paradigm to test this intracortical inhibitory/facilitatory balance by means of a sub-threshold conditioning stimulus (S1) followed by a supra-threshold test stimulus (S2). The test responses are inhibited at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1–5 ms and are facilitated at ISIs of 8–30 ms; these phenomena are referred as short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). The effect of S1 on the size of control MEP is thought to originate at the cortical level (Shimizu et al., 1999, Orth et al., 2003). It is in fact known that a supra-threshold stimulus determines a corticospinal output leading to a MEP, while a sub-threshold stimulus only excites local, cortical inter-neurons (Di Lazzaro et al., 2002). Thus, by combining a sub-threshold pulse with a supra-threshold pulse one can assess the effects of inter-neurons on cortical output (Ziemann et al., 1998). A significant limitation for the understanding of physiological basis of SICI and ICF is that M1 excitatory/inhibitory balance has only been indirectly investigated by means of MEPs amplitude modulation (Ferreri et al., 2006). Recently, a technical device has been introduced that allows recording electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to TMS of a given scalp site with millisecond resolution. Combining TMS with EEG enables a non-invasive, finally direct, method to study cortical reactivity and connectivity (Ilmoniemi et al., 1997). A network of neuronal connections is in fact engaged when TMS-evoked activation extends from a stimulation site to other parts of the brain and the summation of synaptic potentials produces deflections in scalp EEG signals, starting a few milliseconds after stimulus and lasting about 300 ms, first in the form of rapid oscillations and then as lower-frequency waves (Ilmoniemi and Karhu, 2008). The amplitude, latency, and scalp topography of single pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses have been clearly described (Komssi et al., 2004). The characteristics of these responses are thought to depend on the stimulation intensity and functional state of the stimulated cortex as well as the overall brain. Particularly, it has been suggested that the very first part of the TMS-evoked EEG response reflects the reactivity – that is the functional state – of the stimulated cortex while its spatio-temporal distribution over the scalp reflects the spread of activation to other cortical areas via intra and inter-hemispheric cortico-cortical connections as well as to subcortical structures and spinal cord via projection fibres — that is the effective connectivity of the stimulated area (Lee et al., 2003, Komssi and Kähkönen, 2006). The EEG correlates of SICI and ICF as well as their relationships with MEPs modulation have yet to be clearly demonstrated (Daskalakis et al., 2008). In the present study our purposes were, extending previous preliminary results (Paus et al., 2001, Komssi et al., 2004) by means of EEG navigated-ppTMS coregistration, to characterize the neuronal circuits underlying human M1 connectivity, to evaluate SICI and ICF directly from the cortex using EEG and to investigate whether EEG measures of SICI and ICF are related to the same mechanisms underlying EMG measures of SICI and ICF.

Section snippets

Subjects

Eight healthy young female volunteers (age range, 18–30 years) participated to the protocol during their luteal phase of menstrual cycle to avoid the confounding effect of the ovarian cycle on the motor cortex excitability (Smith et al., 2002). In this way we obtained a homogenous group then some attention should be paid before generalizing our results. A written informed consent was obtained before the experiment, after approval by the Ethics Committee. Subjects were instructed to abstain from

A.1. Resting motor threshold

In the examined group the threshold values ranged between 50.6 and 56.4% of the maximal stimulator's output.

A.2. ISI and MEP

The characteristic relationship between ISI and MEP ratios was observed (Kujirai et al., 1993; Ziemann et al., 1996; Fig. 1, C). At ISI 3, 83% of MEP was below the mean value at 120% and the corresponding two-modal distribution revealed two peaks of inhibition (Fig. 1, D) due to some subjects with relatively high MEP values at 120% and stronger inhibition at ISI 3 as well to some others

Discussion

This study adds new insight into previously delineated (Komssi et al., 2004) functional behaviour of human brain as investigated by EEG oscillations evoked by TMS on M1. In fact, two further early responses – N7 and P13 – previously described by some of us (Bonato et al., 2006) were observed and characterized in more details. Moreover, this study confirmed that ppTMS can modulate early and late EEG evoked responses as well as MEPs (Paus et al 2001). This suggests that for some TMS-induced EEG

Conclusion

It is hereby demonstrated that EEG-ppTMS is a promising tool to characterize the neuronal circuits underlying human cortical effective connectivity as well as the neural mechanisms regulating the balance between inhibition and facilitation within the cortices and the corticospinal pathway. It was in fact proved that ppTMS modulates MEPs as well as EEG early and late evoked responses and that for some peaks the EEG variability is partly linked with – and therefore might partially explain – MEPs'

Acknowledgments

The research was granted by University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Telecom Italia Mobile and Lottomatica.

We gratefully thank Mimma Veniero, Mariella Gurzì and Claudia Fracassi for the help in the data acquiring, Reto Huber, Steve Esser, Brady Reidner and Filippo Zappasodi for their fruitful comments.

This study is in memory of Lorenzo Gatto, MD.

References (70)

  • D. Kicic et al.

    Bilateral changes in excitability of sensorimotor cortices during unilateral movement: combined electroencephalographic and transcranial magnetic stimulation study

    Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • S. Komssi et al.

    Ipsi- and contralateral EEG reactions to transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2002)
  • S. Komssi et al.

    The novelty value of the combined use of electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuroscience research

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (2006)
  • L. Lee et al.

    A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • E.O. Mann et al.

    Role of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampal network oscillations

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • S. Molholm et al.

    Multisensory auditory–visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2002)
  • V. Nikouline et al.

    The role of the coil click in TMS assessed with simultaneous EEG

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1999)
  • M. Orth et al.

    The variability of intracortical inhibition and facilitation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • P.M. Rossini et al.

    Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1994)
  • T. Shimizu et al.

    Effect of paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on the cortical silent period

    Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • M. Schürmann et al.

    EEG responses to combined somatosensory and transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2001)
  • R.D. Traub et al.

    Gamma-frequency oscillations: a neuronal population phenomenon, regulated by synaptic and intrinsic cellular processes, and inducing synaptic plasticity

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1998)
  • U. Ziemann

    Pharmacology of TMS

    Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • V.E. Amassian et al.

    Human cerebral cortical responses to contralateral transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Neurosurgery

    (1987)
  • F. Amzica et al.

    Short- and long-range neuronal synchronization of the slow (< 1 Hz) cortical oscillation

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • S. Bender et al.

    Electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in children: evidence for giant inhibitory potentials

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • S. Bestmann et al.

    Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS-fMRI

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2008)
  • M.W. Chee et al.

    Lapsing during sleep deprivation is associated with distributed changes in brain activation

    Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • A. Conte et al.

    Effects of attention on inhibitory and facilitatory phenomena elicited by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2008)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex

    J. Physiol.

    (2002)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    Long-interval cortical inhibition from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS–EEG study

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2008)
  • M. Davare et al.

    Selective modulation of interactions between ventral premotor cortex and primary motor cortex during precision grasping in humans

    J. Physiol.

    (2008)
  • C.H. Davies et al.

    Paired-pulse depression of monosynaptic GABA-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic responses in rat hippocampus

    J. Physiol.

    (1990)
  • V. Di Lazzaro et al.

    Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2006)
  • S.K. Esser et al.

    Modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical circuits

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (192)

    • Electroencephalographic hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease

      2022, International Journal of Psychophysiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text