Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 50, Issue 2, 1 April 2010, Pages 727-733
NeuroImage

Unattended emotional faces elicit early lateralized amygdala–frontal and fusiform activations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.093Get rights and content

Abstract

Human adaptive behaviour to potential threats involves specialized brain responses allowing rapid and reflexive processing of the sensory input and a more directed processing for later evaluation of the nature of the threat. The amygdalae are known to play a key role in emotion processing. It is suggested that the amygdalae process threat-related information through a fast subcortical route and slower cortical feedback. Evidence from human data supporting this hypothesis is lacking. The present study investigated event-related neural responses during processing of facial emotions in the unattended hemifield using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and found activations of the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex to fear as early as 100 ms. The right amygdala exhibited temporally dissociated activations to input from different visual fields, suggesting early subcortical versus later cortical processing of fear. We also observed asymmetrical fusiform activity related to lateralized feed-forward processing of the faces in the visual–ventral stream. Results demonstrate fast, automatic, and parallel processing of unattended emotional faces, providing important insights into the specific and dissociated neural pathways in emotion and face perception.

Section snippets

Subjects

Fourteen healthy, right-handed subjects (mean age, 27 years; seven females) participated in the study. None had a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders and all had normal vision. All subjects provided informed written consent; the study was approved by the Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board.

Task

We studied the effect of task-irrelevant emotional expressions and their location in the visual field (left or right hemifield). Stimuli were projected on a black-background screen

Reaction times

The reaction times (RTs) showed a significant interaction between emotion and the location of the face in the visual field (P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA): RTs to the target (the scrambled pattern) were the longest when the target was paired with a LVF fearful face (mean value = 324 ms). These RTs were significantly longer than those when the target was presented with either a neutral (309 ms, P < 0.005) or a happy (317 ms, P < 0.05) LVF face.

ACC and amygdala activations

Contrasts between the fearful and neutral faces calculated from

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the ACC–amygdala regions are involved in the rapid processing of unattended fearful facial expressions. We found significant activations within the ACC and right amygdala at 100 ms that were stronger in response to the task-irrelevant fearful, relative to the neutral, faces. The dorsal ACC showed increased activity in response to the fearful relative to the neutral faces, while the ventral ACC showed decreased activity in this comparison. Research has

Conclusions

The present study provides novel timing information on early brain activations in the amygdala, ACC, and fusiform regions, adding to our knowledge of implicit processing of human facial emotions. The sensitivity to task-irrelevant fearful emotions suggests that the unattended information operates at a level where potential threat is automatically processed. The early timing of amygdala–ACC activations (at 100 ms) suggests a specialized frontal–limbic network that could facilitate fast reaction

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants to M.J.T. (MOP-81161) and Y.H. (CDG-87793) and the Ontario Student Opportunity Trust Fund—Hospital for Sick Children Foundation Student Scholarship Program to Y.H.

References (56)

  • HolmesA. et al.

    The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • LammeV.A. et al.

    The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • LiuL. et al.

    Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • LuoQ. et al.

    Neural dynamics for facial threat processing as revealed by gamma band synchronization using MEG

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • MarguliesD.S. et al.

    Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • NoesseltT. et al.

    Asymmetrical activation in the human brain during processing of fearful faces

    Curr. Biol.

    (2005)
  • PessoaL.

    To what extent are emotional visual stimuli processed without attention and awareness?

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2005)
  • ShattuckD.W. et al.

    BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool

    Med. Image Anal.

    (2002)
  • SinghK.D. et al.

    Group imaging of task-related changes in cortical synchronisation using nonparametric permutation testing

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • VuilleumierP. et al.

    Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging

    Neuropsychologia

    (2007)
  • BanksS.J. et al.

    Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • BarbeauE.J. et al.

    Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2008)
  • CauquilA.S. et al.

    Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?

    NeuroReport

    (2000)
  • CheyneD. et al.

    Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event-related beamforming approach

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2006)
  • CondeF. et al.

    Afferent connections of the medial frontal cortex of the rat. II: cortical and subcortical afferents

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1995)
  • DrevetsW.C. et al.

    Reciprocal suppression of regional cerebral blood flow during emotional versus higher cognitive processes: implications for interactions between emotion and cognition

    Cognition Emotion

    (1998)
  • EimerM. et al.

    An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing

    NeuroReport

    (2002)
  • FelminghamK. et al.

    Changes in anterior cingulate and amygdala after cognitive behavior therapy of posttraumatic stress disorder

    Psychological Science

    (2007)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Unconscious processing of emotions and the right hemisphere

      2021, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In line with these conclusions, Gläscher and Adolphs (2003) and Wright et al. (2003) proposed that the right amygdala might be involved in the rapid processing of emotional stimuli, and that the left amygdala could play a role in the more complex process of stimulus evaluation (a schematic representation of the subcortical and cortical routes through which emotional stimuli might reach the amygdala in the right and left hemisphere is shown in Fig. 2.1). Results consistent with these reports have been obtained with different neuroimaging techniques (Nomura et al., 2004; Noesselt et al., 2005; Williams et al., 2006) as well as with electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) investigations (Balconi and Lucchiari, 2008; Pegna et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2009; Hung et al., 2010). Some of these investigations focused on the side of amygdala activation associated with conscious vs unconscious processing of emotional information.

    • Neurophysiological correlates of emotional face perception consciousness

      2020, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Magnetic Resonance Imaging normalization and extraction of the data of each subject were performed and the mean intensity of specific Brodmann areas (BAs) was extracted for each ERP component. Referring to the main literature on the neurobiological correlates in visual conscious processing of faces (Eimer and Holmes, 2007; Hung et al., 2010; Koch et al., 2016; Vuilleumier and Pourtois, 2007) five regions of interest (ROIs), corresponding to specific combinations of Brodmann areas (BAs), have been defined. Specifically, the occipital ROI included BAs 17, 18, and 19; the anterior cingulate ROI included BAs 24, 32, and 33; the temporal ROI included BAs 20, 21, 22, 37, 38, 41, 42, and 43; the parietal ROI included BAs 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7; and the prefrontal ROI included BAs 9, 10, 11, 25, 46, and 47.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text