Elsevier

Neurobiology of Aging

Volume 32, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages 655-668
Neurobiology of Aging

Regular paper
A cognitive training intervention improves modality-specific attention in a randomized controlled trial of healthy older adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Age-related deficits in cognitive and sensory function can result in increased distraction from background sensory stimuli. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of a cognitive training intervention aimed at helping healthy older adults suppress irrelevant auditory and visual stimuli. Sixty-six participants received 8 weeks of either the modality-specific attention training program or an educational lecture control program. Participants who completed the intervention program had larger improvements in modality-specific selective attention following training than controls. These improvements also correlated with reductions in bimodal integration during selective attention. Further, the intervention group showed larger improvements than the control group in non-trained domains such as processing speed and dual-task completion, demonstrating the utility of modality-specific attention training for improving cognitive function in healthy older adults.

Introduction

Normal aging is accompanied by changes in many sensory and cognitive domains, causing impairments in memory, communication, balance, and mobility that can lead to difficulty performing basic activities of daily living (Cahn-Weiner et al., 2000, Hedden and Gabrieli, 2004, Owsley and McGwin, 2004, Wood et al., 2005, Murphy et al., 2006, Inzitari et al., 2007, Maki et al., 2008). Thus, a major goal of aging research is to develop methods for maintaining independence and quality of life for older adults. Because the brain retains some plasticity with age, interventions aimed at training cognitive abilities may provide a means for maintaining or strengthening cognitive skills in healthy older adults (Kempermann et al., 2002, Jones et al., 2006, Acevedo and Loewenstein, 2007). In fact, several cognitive training programs have been shown to be effective at improving healthy older adults’ memory, reasoning, speed of processing, and dual-task performance (Ball et al., 2002, Edwards et al., 2005, Bherer et al., 2006, Mahncke et al., 2006, Willis et al., 2006, Erickson et al., 2007).

Although the neural mechanisms that underlie age-related cognitive decline remain equivocal, age-related reductions in brain volume (Raz et al., 2004) and cortical thickness (Salat et al., 2004) are most pronounced in the prefrontal cortex, and executive processes supported by the prefrontal cortex, including attention, inhibition, and working memory, are highly susceptible to age-related declines (West, 1999, Grady and Craik, 2000, Andres et al., 2008). Deficits in these executive functions can impair older adults’ performance on a broad range of cognitive tasks, as age-related increases in distraction from task-irrelevant visual stimuli, sounds, and speech can interfere with processing information that is relevant to the task (Alain and Woods, 1999, Tun et al., 2002, McPhee et al., 2004, Andres et al., 2006, Healey et al., 2008). For example, older adults’ responses to visual stimuli are slowed more than younger adults’ when the visual stimulus is preceded by a novel sound (Andres et al., 2006).

In addition to the cognitive factors that influence older adults’ task performance, age-related declines in sensory acuity and alterations in how stimuli from different sensory modalities are integrated together can also play a role in functional abilities (Wood et al., 2005, Murphy et al., 2006). Murphy et al. (2006) demonstrated that the comprehension and memory deficits that older adults experience when processing two-person conversations can be eliminated by compensating for older adults hearing difficulties. However, older adults still performed worse than younger adults when the two talkers were spatially separated (Murphy et al., 2006). These results indicate that although ameliorating basic sensory impairments can improve older adults’ ability to process sensory information, additional means may be required to minimize age-related deficits.

Enhancing the sensory signals that older adults receive from the environment is one method for recovering function; another technique is to reduce the amount of background noise being processed along with the relevant sensory information. Older adults exhibit enhanced integration of information from multiple sensory modalities compared to younger adults (Laurienti et al., 2006, Peiffer et al., 2007, Diederich et al., 2008). The inappropriate integration of irrelevant or non-matching sensory stimuli can serve to increase noise and interfere with processing of relevant information (Alain and Woods, 1999, Strupp et al., 1999, Andres et al., 2006). One cognitive mechanism for reducing such cross-modal noise is modality-specific selective attention, which allows us to focus on information in one modality by suppressing the processing of stimuli in the ignored modality (Spence and Driver, 1997, Spence et al., 2001). Selective attention to either the auditory or visual modality has been demonstrated to eliminate the integration of congruent audiovisual stimuli in younger adults (Talsma et al., 2007, Mozolic et al., 2008); however, older adults still demonstrate increased multisensory integration during selective attention (Hugenschmidt et al., 2009), and it is unknown whether improving selective attention in older adults could reduce susceptibility to distraction from irrelevant sensory stimuli.

Our goal for this study was to investigate the effects of selective attention training in healthy older adults. The training program was designed to improve participants’ ability to suppress background auditory and visual stimuli in an effort to decrease the amount of distraction experienced by older adults, and consequently improve their ability to process relevant information. Our hypothesis was that successful completion of the training program would reduce the influence of an ignored sensory modality on tasks that require modality-specific selective attention. Additionally, we investigated whether improvements would generalize to a wide variety of cognitive tasks, with the idea that improved sensory processing could have a positive effect on a broad range of cognitive functions that rely on the suppression of cross-modal noise.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were recruited from the community for this randomized, controlled, single-blind study. All study procedures were approved by and conducted in accordance with the Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. All participants signed an informed consent and were compensated approximately US$ 20 per hour for their participation in the study. Seventy-five adults between the age of 65 and 75 were screened for eligibility. Sixty-six of these participants (mean age =

Results

A modality-specific selective attention training program, designed to promote suppression of background auditory and visual stimuli, was administered to 33 participants. Thirty-three participants were also enrolled in a control educational lecture program. Three participants did not complete the intervention program. Two of these participants had scheduling conflicts arise that prevented them from completing the training and the third was not available for post-training evaluation due to

Discussion

Numerous studies in animals and human subjects have demonstrated that the adult mammalian brain retains plasticity, even at advanced ages (Rosenzweig and Bennett, 1996, Colcombe et al., 2004, Bherer et al., 2006, Segovia et al., 2006, Erickson et al., 2007, Mora et al., 2007). This retention of plasticity provides a great opportunity for environmental modification of brain function and behavior. Cognitive training programs that involve repetitive practice on basic cognitive skills, such as

Disclosure

Authors J.L.M. and P.J.L., and Wake Forest University School of Medicine are in the process of applying for a patent for the training program described in this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Authors A.B.L., A.R.M., and M.R.P. have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Allen Elster, Jr. and Drs. Mark Espeland, Steve Kritchevsky, and Jeff Williamson for their invaluable assistance with study design, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R21-AG026353 and K08-NS42568 to P.J.L., F31-AG030838 to J.L.M., and M01-RR07122 to the Wake Forest University General Clinical Research Center).

References (80)

  • R. Kawashima et al.

    Selective visual and auditory attention toward utterances—a PET study

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • S.A. Langenecker et al.

    fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • P.J. Laurienti et al.

    Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2006)
  • B. Lopez-Luengo et al.

    Effects of Attention Process Training on cognitive functioning of schizophrenic patients

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2003)
  • B.E. Maki et al.

    Preventing falls in older adults: New interventions to promote more effective change-in-support balance reactions

    J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.

    (2008)
  • V.S. Mattay et al.

    Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2006)
  • J. Miller

    Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals

    Cognit. Psychol.

    (1982)
  • F. Mora et al.

    Aging, plasticity and environmental enrichment: structural changes and neurotransmitter dynamics in several areas of the brain

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (2007)
  • M.I. Posner et al.

    The neurobiology of selective attention

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1992)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2004)
  • G. Rees et al.

    Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task

    Neuropsychologia

    (2001)
  • M.R. Rosenzweig et al.

    Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1996)
  • G. Segovia et al.

    Environmental enrichment promotes neurogenesis and changes the extracellular concentrations of glutamate and GABA in the hippocampus of aged rats

    Brain. Res. Bull.

    (2006)
  • N. Tzourio et al.

    Functional anatomy of human auditory attention studied with PET

    Neuroimage

    (1997)
  • A. Acevedo et al.

    Nonpharmacological cognitive interventions in aging and dementia

    J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol.

    (2007)
  • C. Alain et al.

    Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory

    Psychol. Aging

    (1999)
  • P. Andres et al.

    Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition

    Dev. Neuropsychol.

    (2008)
  • K. Ball et al.

    The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions

    J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.

    (2007)
  • K. Ball et al.

    Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • O. Beauchet et al.

    Dual-task-related gait changes in transitionally frail older adults: the type of the walking-associated cognitive task matters

    Gerontology

    (2005)
  • C.R. Bowie et al.

    Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test

    Nat. Protoc.

    (2006)
  • G. Bravo et al.

    Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini-Mental and modified Mini-Mental State Examinations derived from a non-demented elderly population

    Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • D.A. Cahn-Weiner et al.

    Prediction of functional status from neuropsychological tests in community-dwelling elderly individuals

    Clin. Neuropsychol.

    (2000)
  • S.J. Colcombe et al.

    Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • R. Desimone et al.

    Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J. Duncan et al.

    Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities

    Nature

    (1997)
  • J.D. Edwards et al.

    The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance

    Aging Ment. Health

    (2005)
  • C.L. Grady et al.

    Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex

    Neuroreport

    (1997)
  • D.M. Green et al.

    Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics

    (1966)
  • T. Hedden et al.

    Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2004)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Effect of age-related hearing loss on cognitive function and sound localization

      2023, Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text