Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 598, 26 June 2015, Pages 85-90
Neuroscience Letters

Research article
Association between NR4A2 genetic variation and schizophrenia: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.05.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Comprehensively quantified the impact of all the reported variants of NR4A2 on schizophrenia risk.

  • Summarized all the genotype distribution of NR4A2 variants and made a comprehensive meta-analysis of three SNPs in case-control studies.

  • Five variants of NR4A2 were present only in cases.

  • Failed to reveal significant association between NR4A2 variation and SZ risk.

Abstract

The homo sapiens nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A (NR4A2) genetic variation has been implicated as a risk factor for schizophrenia (SZ). Nevertheless, the results are inconclusive. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the impact of NR4A2 variation on the risk of SZ. All eligible case-control studies published up to September 2014 were identified by searching PubMed OVID, EBSCO, PsycINFO and ISI web of knowledge. Pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to access the strength of association in fixed- or random-effects model. Seven studies that reported 17 variants with a total of 3027 participants were included. Of these variants, five ones (rs143618355, rs199674295, c.366-369 del TAC, c.-469delG and P4) were present only in cases, and three ones (rs35479735, rs3832066 and rs397706674) were available for meta-analysis. Overall, there was no significant association between the three variants and SZ risk under allele model, dominant model and recessive model. The results failed to reveal significant link between NR4A2 polymorphism and SZ risk. However, large-sized and well-designed studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Introduction

Schizophrenia (SZ), a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disorder, affects approximately 1 of 100 people worldwide (about 26.3 millions of people) [41]. The underlying pathology of SZ remains unclear. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to elucidate the pathogenic mechanism of SZ [12], [21], [31], among which, the dopamine hypothesis has been drawing growing attention during the past two decades [11].

The homo sapiens nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A (NR4A2, also known as NURR1/NOT/TINUR/RNR-1/HZF-3), a member of the steroid/thyroid hormone nuclear receptor superfamily [40], [25], [38], plays a vital role in development, survival and functional maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons [2], [7], [25], [37]. Recently, numerous studies indicated that NR4A2 might be a potential susceptibility gene for SZ. Some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of NR4A2, which resulted in significant reduction of NR4A2 mRNA [45] and sharp decreased expression in cell density or staining intensity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of SZ patients [16], were identified only in patients rather than in controls [5], [8]. The SZ patients who carried recessive genotypes of tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs1150143, rs1150144, rs834830, and rs707132) in NR4A2 showed worse performance on a sustained attention task [1]. Thus, we reasonably hypothesize that NR4A2 gene mutation induces gene expression as well as dopamine-related dysfunction and abnormal behavior of SZ afterwards. The same observations were made in animal research as well, and NR4A2 heterozygous (+/−) mice has been suggested as a potential animal model for the studies on some of the behavioral and molecular mechanisms underlying SZ [43], [35].

However, the results are inconsistent. Some other studies did not support the notion that NR4A2 gene played a major role in risk of SZ [14], [23], [36]. Whether the NR4A2 gene mutation is a risk factor for SZ remains conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by combining all the available studies to evaluate the overall effect between them in the present study.

Section snippets

Search strategy

The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement [32]. PubMed OVID, EBSCO, PsycINFO and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched up to September 2014 by two investigators independently using the following search terms: (“nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2” or “nuclear receptor related 1” or “NURR1” or “NR4A2” or “TINUR” or “RNR-1” or “HZF-3”) and “schizophrenia”. Reference lists and supplemental

Study characteristics and quality

A total of 154 potentially relevant studies were retrieved with the initial search, and 1 study was obtained manually through reference lists. Nine studies were identified meeting the criteria [1], [5], [6], [8], [22], [23], [34], [36], [39], [44]. Two studies were discarded after further scrutiny because the genotype/allele distribution could not be obtained directly, calculated from the text or supplied by the authors [34], [39]. Thus, a total of 7 studies [1], [5], [6], [8], [22], [23], [36]

Discussion

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and included 7 studies with a total of 3027 participants to explore the association between NR4A2 gene variation and SZ risk. We systematically summarized all the genotype distribution of 17 genetic variants that have been reported up to now, and made a comprehensive meta-analysis of the 3 available variants (rs35479735, rs397706674 and rs3832066). Our quantitative analysis failed to reveal significant association based on the

Conclusions

In conclusion, we made a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association between NR4A2 variation and SZ risk. We found five variants were present only in SZ patients, nevertheless we failed to reveal significant association between the available three SNPs and SZ risk based on current evidences. Thus, large-sized and well-designed studies with involvement of various genes and/or environment are warranted to validate our findings.

Conflict of interest

The authors certify no conflict of interest related to this study.

Contributors

Conceived and designed the mauscript: Hongmei Liu; Searched for and selected the publications: Hongbo Liu Hongmei Liu; Extract and analyzed the data: Yingmei Fu, Juanjuan Ren; Prepare figures: Juanjuan Ren Hongmei Liu; Contributed materials/analysis tools: Shunying Yu, Ping Jiang; Wrote and revised the paper: Hongmei Liu Juanjuan Ren Yi Dong; Supervised the study: Huafang Li. All authors contributed to and had approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Vishwajit L. Nimgaonkar for kindly reply to our request for the data necessary for the meta-analysis, and thank Dr. Qingzhong Wang for help with data analysis. This work was supported partly by Grant from the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders (13dz2260500), National Major Project for IND (2012ZX09303-003), and Shanghai Health Talent Professional Project (XBR2011049) for Huafang Li, and Shanghai Natural Science Fund Project (14ZR1435700) and Shanghai

References (47)

  • C.B. Begg et al.

    Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

    Biometrics

    (1994)
  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method

    Br. Med. J.

    (1995)
  • S. Buervenich et al.

    NURR1 mutations in cases of schizophrenia and manic-depressive disorder

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (2000)
  • A. Carmine et al.

    NURR1 promoter polymorphisms: Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and personality traits

    Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.

    (2003)
  • Y.H. Chen et al.

    Mutation analysis of the human NR4A2 gene an essential gene for midbrain dopaminergic neurogenesis, in schizophrenic patients

    Am. J. Med. Genet.

    (2001)
  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Br. Med. J.

    (1997)
  • D. Eyles et al.

    Schizophrenia: do all roads lead to dopamine or is this where they start? Evidence from two epidemiologically informed developmental rodent models

    Transl. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • S.H. Fatemi et al.

    The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia, revisited

    Schizophre. Bull.

    (2009)
  • F. Faul et al.

    G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

    Behav. Res. Methods

    (2007)
  • J. Feng et al.

    Structural variants in the retinoid receptor genes in patients with schizophrenia and other psychiatric diseases

    Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.

    (2005)
  • A.B. Goodman

    Three independent lines of evidence suggest retinoids as causal to schizophrenia

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1998)
  • A.L. Guillozet-Bongaarts et al.

    Altered g Ene Expression in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex of Individuals with Schizophrenia

    (2013)
  • D.G. Healy et al.

    NR4A2 genetic variation in sporadic Parkinson’s disease: a genewide approach

    Mov. Disorders

    (2006)
  • Cited by (8)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    The authors contributed equally to the paper.

    View full text