Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 490, Issue 2, 25 February 2011, Pages 121-125
Neuroscience Letters

Adaptation to bimanual asymmetric weights in isometric force coordination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.040Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined how different weighting coefficients imposed on individual finger force regulate bimanual finger force coordination patterns under the influence of bilateral coupling and visual information of the force output. The weighted sum of the two forces was computed as the total force output to match two target force levels (10% and 35% MVC) in separate conditions, and visual feedback of the total force output was provided in the experiment. The results revealed higher performance error at 35% in comparison with 10% MVC with the greatest error at the unequal coefficient setting. The correlation between the individual forces and the force output ratios correlated nonlinearly with the weighting coefficient ratios; however, the extent of change was much smaller than the coefficient ratios. The results suggest that bilateral coupling and task constraints interact to determine the coordination strategy. The irregularity of the individual finger forces increased with the weighting coefficient while the irregularity of the total force remained the same. The results support the hypothesis that the organization of redundant motor coordination patterns emerges from the interactive effect of the constraints on movement.

Research highlights

▶ Bilateral weighting coefficients influence the task performance. ▶ Bimanual force coordination patterns correlate nonlinearly with weighting coefficient. ▶ Interaction of constraints organizes motor coordination and control patterns.

References (22)

  • Z.M. Li et al.

    Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Coherence and interlimb force control: Effects of visual gain

      2018, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants tried to match the weighted sum of individual finger forces to the target. Unequal coefficient ratios essentially caused different contributions from each hand to total bimanual force resulting in force asymmetry [11]. Given that visuomotor processing during force control was highly associated with force oscillation below 4 Hz [29], we hypothesized that peak coherence at 0–4 Hz was higher at high gain when two hands produced symmetrical forces.

    • Goal conceptualization and symmetry of arm movements affect bimanual coordination in individuals after stroke

      2016, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      A critical difference between independent- and common-goal tasks is that task success in common-goal tasks is dependent on cooperative interaction between the two arms. Thus, the performance of each arm can compensate for, and covary with that of the other to accomplish a common goal [12–15]. Functional imaging in healthy adults has demonstrated that distinct neural substrates underlie performance of independent- and common-goal movements [16].

    • Increased visual information gain improves bimanual force coordination

      2015, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, evidence indicates that the amount of visual information about the task (i.e., 8 versus 80 pixels/N) interacts with the asymmetry of bimanual coordination tasks. At a visual gain less than 80 pixels/N, motor performance improvements by visual information were greater for the symmetric than the asymmetric bimanual coordination tasks [5–8]. However, sparse evidence exits on whether the interaction between visual information and bimanual force control symmetry persists for higher visual information gains (i.e., 256 and 512 pixels/N).

    • Force control in chronic stroke

      2015, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, lower RMSE and force variability indicate better task performance during force control in aging studies (Baweja et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2011; Tracy et al., 2007; Vaillancourt and Newell, 2003). A common finding across studies indicates that elderly groups show greater RMSE, SD, and CV than young control groups (Baweja et al., 2009; Hermsdorfer et al., 2003; Hu et al., 2011; Hu and Newell, 2011; Ofori et al., 2010). Similarly, during bimanual isometric force control, stroke survivors revealed higher task error (e.g., greater RMSE) at submaximal force levels (e.g., 5–50% of MVC) in comparison to an age-matched control group (Lodha et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text