Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 451, Issue 3, 27 February 2009, Pages 175-180
Neuroscience Letters

A utricular origin of frequency tuning to low-frequency vibration in the human vestibular system?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.055Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that the human vestibular system displays a remarkable sensitivity to low-frequency vibration. To address the origin of this sensitivity we compared the frequency response properties of vestibular reflexes to 10 ms bursts of air-conducted sound and transmastoid vibration, which are thought to be differentially selective for the saccule and utricle, respectively. Measurements were made using two separate central pathways: vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), which are a manifestation of vestibulo-collic projections, and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs), which are a manifestation of vestibulo-ocular projections. For both response pathways air-conducted sound and vibration stimuli produced the same patterns of quite different tuning. Sound was characterised by a band-pass tuning with best frequency between 400 and 800 Hz whereas vibration showed a low-pass type response with a largest response at 100 Hz. Our results suggest that the tuning is at least in part due to properties of end-organs themselves, while the 100 Hz best frequency may be a specifically utricular feature.

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

We thank Sendhil Govender for assistance in data collection. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Foundation.

References (30)

  • I.S. Curthoys et al.

    Bone conducted vibration selectively activates irregular primary otolithic vestibular neurons in the guinea pig

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2006)
  • S.G. Diamond et al.

    Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function

    Neurology

    (1983)
  • A. Didier et al.

    Acoustic responses recorded from the saccular bundle on the eighth nerve of the guinea pig

    Hear. Res.

    (1989)
  • J.M. Goldberg, C. Fernandez, The Vestibular System, in: I. Darian-Smith (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous...
  • A.J. Hudspeth et al.

    A model for electrical resonance and frequency tuning in saccular hair cells of the bull-frog, Rana catesbeiana

    J. Physiol.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (105)

    • Why and when to refer patients for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: A critical review

      2019, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The same frequency tuning changes have also been noted with oVEMPs (Singh and Barman, 2016). With regards to the frequency sensitivity itself, it is suggested that the phenomenon of frequency tuning in the vestibular end organs may be a result of an electrical resonance intrinsic to the hair cells (Ashmore, 1983; Todd et al., 2009). It is usually assessed by performing both c- and oVEMPs in the standard way, but separately using two different sound frequencies, namely 500 Hz and 1 kHz.

    • Skull vibration induced nystagmus in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence

      2019, Annales Francaises d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale
    • Skull vibration induced nystagmus in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence

      2019, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases
    • Effects of the stimulus phase on the air-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential in healthy subjects

      2017, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was also shown that the afferent units have a tuning curve after ACS and BCV with maximal responses between 500 and 1000 Hz (Curthoys et al., 2006, 2016; McCue and Guinan, 1994; Murofushi and Curthoys, 1997; Young et al., 1977). Although it was demonstrated that the responses also show tuning curves (Chihara et al., 2009; Park et al., 2010; Rauch et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2012; Todd et al., 2000, 2009; Welgampola and Colebatch, 2001; Zhang et al., 2011) and the responses tend to occur spaced by 2 ms after stimulation with 500 Hz tone bursts (Lim et al., 2013), the effect of the stimulus phase in humans, however, is not as clear. Until this study was written, Govender et al. (2016a) were the only authors to the best of our knowledge who formally described the effect of ACS stimulus polarity in humans and, contrary to what would be expected from the animal studies, they did not find significant differences in latencies or amplitude of the responses.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text