Review article
The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The article provides a comprehensive review of evidence for interindividual and intraindividual differences in meta-control preferences.

  • The article considers both biological and cultural factors responsible for metacontrol preferences.

  • The article provides a mechanistic model of how genes and cultural factors impact metacontrol preferences.

Abstract

Humans often face binary cognitive-control dilemmas, with the choice between persistence and flexibility being a crucial one. Tackling these dilemmas requires metacontrol, i.e., the control of the current cognitive-control policy. As predicted from functional, psychometric, neuroscientific, and modeling approaches, interindividual variability in metacontrol biases towards persistence or flexibility could be demonstrated in metacontrol-sensitive tasks. These biases covary systematically with genetic predispositions regarding mesofrontal and nigrostriatal dopaminergic functioning and the individualistic or collectivistic nature of the cultural background. However, there is also evidence for mood- and meditation-induced intraindividual variability (with negative mood and focused-attention meditation being associated with a bias towards persistence, and positive mood and open-monitoring meditation being associated with a bias towards flexibility), suggesting that genetic and cultural factors do not determine metacontrol settings entirely. We suggest a theoretical framework that explains how genetic predisposition and cultural learning can lead to the implementation of metacontrol defaults, which however can be shifted towards persistence or flexibility by situational factors.

Section snippets

Cognitive control and metacontrol

Human behavior is characterized by its considerable flexibility, which in contrast to other species, and other primates, allows behavioral adjustments without extensive training and practice. The processes that are thought to be responsible for this flexibility are commonly referred to as cognitive-control processes or executive functions (e.g., Diamond, 2013). While there is no agreed-upon inventory of human cognitive control processes, a particularly popular set of functions has been

Genetics

Evidence for interindividual variability comes from behavioral genetics studies of polymorphisms that are known to be related to dopaminergic processing in the mesofrontal and the nigrostriatal pathway. COMT Val158Met affects the efficiency of frontal dopaminergic processing (Chen et al., 2004) and DRD2 C957T the level of striatal dopamine (Hirvonen et al., 2009a, Hirvonen et al., 2009b). As polymorphisms of these genes seem to affect the relative efficiency of either the frontal or striatal

Mood

At least two research lines have tested the possibility, and provided evidence that mood—or the functional or neural state underlying it—entertains an intimate link to metacontrol. For one, positive mood is suspected to promote loose thinking and efficient brainstorming (Ashby et al., 1999), and many studies have indeed reported that divergent thinking benefits from positive-mood induction (Baas et al., 2008, Isen, 1999). Both neuroscientific (Ashby et al., 1999) and functional (Nijstad et al.,

Mechanisms of metacontrol sharing

Findings from behavioral genetics and from cultural studies have demonstrated the existence of systematic intraindividual differences with respect to indicators of metacontrol biases. The complexity of dopaminergic interactions underlying control processes is not yet sufficiently understood to allow for directed predictions under many circumstances, but there are clear proofs of principle that polymorphisms of genes impacting frontal and striatal dopaminergic processing are associated with

Conclusions and open questions

We have seen that genetic disposition and culture are associated with systematic interindividual variability in relative metacontrol biases towards persistence or flexibility. This means that one precondition for interpersonal sharing of metacontrol settings is fulfilled: if people differ in metacontrol settings, it may make sense to transfer them from one to another. We also have seen that situational factors can bias metacontrol towards persistence or flexibility, with mood and meditation

References (135)

  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Meditation-induced cognitive-control states regulate response-conflict adaptation: evidence from trial-to-trial adjustments in the Simon task

    Conscious. Cogn.

    (2015)
  • R.J. Dolan et al.

    Goals and habits in the brain

    Neuron

    (2013)
  • D. Durstewitz et al.

    The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase genotypes and schizophrenia

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • R. Fischer et al.

    Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance

    Cognition

    (2012)
  • M. Furman et al.

    Similarity effect and optimal control of multiple-choice decision making

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • M.M. Hirvonen et al.

    C957T polymorphism of the human dopamine D2 receptor gene predicts extrastriatal dopamine receptor availability

    Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol.

    (2009)
  • B. Hommel et al.

    Religion and action control: faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance

    Cognition

    (2011)
  • B. Hommel

    The Simon effect as tool and heuristic

    Acta Psychol.

    (2011)
  • B. Hommel

    Between persistence and flexibility: the Yin and Yang of action control

  • B.J. Jongkees et al.

    Spontaneous eye blink rate as predictor of dopamine-related cognitive function—a review

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2016)
  • U. Kühnen et al.

    Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • A. Lutz et al.

    Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2008)
  • E. McKone et al.

    Asia has the global advantage: race and visual attention

    Vision Res.

    (2010)
  • S. Akbari Chermahini et al.

    The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking

    Cognition

    (2010)
  • S. Akbari Chermahini et al.

    Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways

    Psychol. Res.

    (2012)
  • N. Ambady et al.

    Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • F.G. Ashby et al.

    A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • M. Baas et al.

    A meta-analysis of 25 years of research on mood and creativity: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2008)
  • J.A. Bargh

    Conditional automaticity: varieties of automatic influence on social perception and cognition

  • J.M. Beaulieu et al.

    The physiology, signaling and pharmacology of dopamine receptors

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • A. Boesak

    Apartheid, Liberation and the Calvinist Tradition

    (1984)
  • M.M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2001)
  • M.M. Botvinick

    Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function

    Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • J.D. Bratt

    Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader Grand Rapids, Mich.

    (1998)
  • M. Camps et al.

    Autoradiographic localization of dopamine D 1 and D 2 receptors in the brain of several mammalian species

    J. Neural Transm.: Gen. Sect.

    (1990)
  • A.B. Cohen et al.

    Religion as culture: religious individualism and collectivism among American catholics, Jews and protestants

    J. Pers.

    (2007)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical transactions of the royal society

    Biol. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Losing the big picture: how religion may control visual attention

    PLoS One

    (2008)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Buddha as an eye opener: a link between prosocial attitude and attentional control

    Front. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Religion and the attentional blink: depth of faith predicts depth of the blink

    Front. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Sexual orientation biases attentional control: a possible gaydar mechanism

    Front. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Dopamine and the management of attentional resources: Genetic markers of striatal D2 dopamine predict individual differences in the Attentional Blink

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Up to me or up to us? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration

    Front. Psychol.

    (2012)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking

    Front. Psychol.

    (2012)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Loving-kindness brings loving-kindness: the impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration

    Psychon. Bull. Rev.

    (2012)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Cognitive control and the COMT Val158Met polymorphism: genetic modulation of videogame training and transfer to task-switching efficiency

    Psychol. Res.

    (2014)
  • L.S. Colzato et al.

    Prior meditation practice modulates performance and strategy use in convergent- and divergent-thinking problems

    Mindfulness

    (2017)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • R. Cools

    Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function: implication for L-DOPA therapy in Parkinson’s disease

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2006)
  • R. Cools

    Role of dopamine in the motivational and cognitive control of behaviour

    Neuroscientist

    (2008)
  • Cited by (68)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text