ReviewCommon and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies
Research highlights
▶ We conducted two sets of coordinate-based meta-analyses on 142 fMRI studies of reward. ▶ The core reward circuitry included the nucleus accumbens, insula, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and frontoparietal regions. ▶ The nucleus accumbens was activated by both positive and negative rewards across various reward processing stages. ▶ Other regions showed preferential responses toward positive or negative rewards, or during anticipation or outcome.
Introduction
People face countless reward-related decision making opportunities everyday. Our physical, mental, and socio-economical well-being critically depends on the consequences of the choices we make. It is thus crucial to understand what underlies normal functioning of reward-related decision making. Studying the normal functioning of reward-related decision making also helps us to better understand the various behavioral and mental disorders which arise when such function is disrupted, such as depression (Drevets, 2001), substance abuse (Bechara, 2005, Garavan and Stout, 2005, Volkow et al., 2003), and eating disorders (Kringelbach et al., 2003, Volkow and Wise, 2005).
Functional neuroimaging research on reward has become a rapidly growing field. We have observed a huge surge of neuroimaging research in this domain, with dozens of relevant articles showing up in the PubMed database every month. On the one hand, this is exciting because the mounting results are paramount to formalizing behavioral and neural mechanisms of reward-related decision making (Fellows, 2004, Trepel et al., 2005). On the other hand, the heterogeneity of the results in conjunction with the occasional opposing patterns make it difficult to obtain a clear picture of the reward circuitry in human brain. The mixture of results is partly due to diverse experimental paradigms developed by various research groups that aimed to address different aspects of reward-related decision making, such as the distinction between reward anticipation and outcome (Breiter et al., 2001, Knutson et al., 2001b, McClure et al., 2003, Rogers et al., 2004), valuation of positive and negative rewards (Liu et al., 2007, Nieuwenhuis et al., 2005, O’Doherty et al., 2001, O’Doherty et al., 2003a, Ullsperger and von Cramon, 2003), and assessment of risk (Bach et al., 2009, d’Acremont and Bossaerts, 2008, Hsu et al., 2009, Huettel, 2006).
Therefore, it is crucial to pool existing studies together and examine the core reward networks in human brain, from both data-driven and theory-driven approaches to test the commonality and distinction of different aspects of reward-related decision making. To achieve this goal, we employed and compared two coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) methods (Salimi-Khorshidi et al., 2009), activation likelihood estimation (ALE) (Laird et al., 2005, Turkeltaub et al., 2002) and parametric voxel-based meta-analysis (PVM) (Costafreda et al., 2009), so as to reveal the concordance across a large number of neuroimaging studies on reward-related decision making. We anticipated that the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), two major dopaminergic projection areas that have been associated with reward processing, would be consistently activated.
In addition, from a theory-driven perspective, we aimed to elucidate whether there exist distinctions in the brain networks that are responsible for processing positive and negative reward information, and that are preferentially involved in different stages of reward processing such as reward anticipation, outcome monitoring, and decision evaluation. Decision making involves encoding and representation of the alternative options and comparing the values or utilities associated with these options. Across these processes, decision making is usually affiliated with positive or negative valence from either the outcomes or emotional responses toward the choices made. Positive reward valence refers to the positive subjective states we experience (e.g., happiness or satisfaction) when the outcome is positive (e.g., winning a lottery) or better than we anticipate (e.g., losing less value than projected). Negative reward valence refers to the negative feelings we go through (e.g., frustration or regret) when the outcome is negative (e.g., losing a gamble) or worse than what we expect (e.g., stock value increasing lower than projected). Although previous studies have attempted to distinguish reward networks that are sensitive to processing positive or negative information (Kringelbach, 2005, Liu et al., 2007), as well as those that are involved in reward anticipation or outcome (Knutson et al., 2003, Ramnani et al., 2004), empirical results have been mixed. We aimed to extract consistent patterns by pooling over a large number of studies examining these distinctions.
Section snippets
Study identification
Two independent researchers conducted a thorough search of the literature for fMRI studies examining reward-based decision making in humans. The terms used to search the online citation indexing service PUBMED (through June 2009) were “fMRI”, “reward”, and “decision” (by the first researcher), “reward decision making task”, “fMRI”, and “human” (by the second researcher). These initial search results were merged to yield a total of 182 articles. Another 90 articles were identified from a
ALE results
The all-inclusive analysis of 142 studies showed significant activation of a large cluster that encompassed the bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc), pallidum, anterior insula, lateral/medial OFC, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), supplementary motor area (SMA), lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), right amygdala, left hippocampus, thalamus, and brain stem (Fig. 1A). Other smaller clusters included the right middle frontal gyrus and left middle/inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral inferior/superior
Discussion
We are constantly making decisions in our everyday life. Some decisions involve no apparent positive or negative values of the outcomes whereas others have significant impacts on the valence of the results and our emotional responses toward the choices we make. We may feel happy and satisfied when the outcome is positive or our expectation is fulfilled, or feel frustrated when the outcome is negative or lower than what we anticipated. Moreover, many decisions must be made without advance
Contributions
XL designed and supervised the whole study. JH and MS made equal contributions to this study, performing literature search, data extraction and organization. JF participated in discussion and manuscript preparation.
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the Hundred-Talent Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, NARSAD Young Investigator Award (XL), and NIH Grant R21MH083164 (JF). The authors wish to thank the development team of BrainMap and Sergi G. Costafreda for providing excellent tools for this study.
References (83)
- et al.
Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits
Neuron
(2009) - et al.
Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses
Neuron
(2001) - et al.
ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain
Neuroimage
(2010) - et al.
A parametric approach to voxel-based meta-analysis
Neuroimage
(2009) - et al.
Neural activity in the human brain relating to uncertainty and arousal during anticipation
Neuron
(2001) - et al.
An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning
Neuroimage
(2005) Neuroimaging and neuropathological studies of depression: implications for the cognitive-emotional features of mood disorders
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2001)- et al.
Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents
Neuroimage
(2005) - et al.
Neurocognitive insights into substance abuse
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2005) - et al.
A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: characterization with rapid event-related fMRI
Neuroimage
(2003)
The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology
Prog. Neurobiol.
The neural basis of financial risk taking
Neuron
Willed action and attention to the selection of action
Neuroimage
Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum
Neuron
Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain
Neuron
Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward
Neuron
Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism
Neuroimage
Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI
Neuroimage
A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea
Neuroimage
Prediction error for free monetary reward in the human prefrontal cortex
Neuroimage
Distinct portions of anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex are activated by reward processing in separable phases of decision-making cognition
Biol. Psychiatry
Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies
Neuroimage
Orbitofrontal cortex, associative learning, and expectancies
Neuron
Encoding predicted outcome and acquired value in orbitofrontal cortex during cue sampling depends upon input from basolateral amygdala
Neuron
Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk
Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.
Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation
Neuroimage
Dissociable contributions of the human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to incentive motivation and goal selection
J. Neurosci.
Neural activity associated with the passive prediction of ambiguity and risk for aversive events
J. Neurosci.
Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective
Nat. Neurosci.
Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: similarities and differences from young adults
J. Neurosci.
The problem of functional localization in the human brain
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI
Neuropsychologia
Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.
Your resting brain CAREs about your risky behavior
PLoS One
Learning to like: a role for human orbitofrontal cortex in conditioned reward
J. Neurosci.
How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Neurobiological studies of risk assessment: a comparison of expected utility and mean-variance approaches
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.
Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty
Hum. Brain Mapp.
Hedonic and informational functions of the human orbitofrontal cortex
Cereb. Cortex
Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems
J. Neurosci.
Cited by (738)
The neural substrates responsible for punishment sensitivity association with procrastination: Left putamen connectivity with left middle temporal gyrus
2024, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryNeural correlates of willingness to pay for items: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies
2024, Physiology and BehaviorIncreased brain nucleus accumbens functional connectivity in melancholic depression
2024, Neuropharmacology