ReviewCategory learning and the memory systems debate
Section snippets
Neuropsychological dissociations
Early studies of intact procedural learning in amnesia focused on the learning of motor skills (e.g., Brooks and Baddeley, 1976; Corkin, 1968), perceptual skills (e.g., mirror reading: Cohen and Squire, 1980; Martone et al., 1984), and cognitive skills (e.g., Tower of Hanoi: Cohen et al., 1985). In each of these cases, dissociations were found between skill learning and explicit memory for the study episode. However, these tasks did not generally make strong contact with models of learning and
Behavioral dissociations
If classification learning does not require declarative memory, then it should be possible to dissociate the two in normal subjects by manipulations that affect declarative but not procedural memory systems. In a recent study (Foerde et al., 2007), we examined whether the presence of a secondary task during learning would affect declarative memory more than category learning. Participants learned the PCT either alone or while additionally performing a secondary tonecounting task. Inclusion of
Neuroimaging
Although studies of patients with brain damage may provide evidence regarding the necessity of particular brain systems for particular cognitive functions, they can only provide limited insight into the neural architecture of normal behavior. In particular, if memory systems are not completely independent then their function in the normal individual will differ. Neuroimaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can fill this gap, by elucidating the dynamics of neural
Single-system approaches
Although the foregoing data seem to compel the notion of MMS, a number of theorists have posited that dissociations between memory phenomena can be accounted for using a single memory system. Their main argument has relied on the use of simple computational models to show that the behavioral data demonstrating dissociations can be fit equally well by models that posit just a single memory mechanism. For example, Nosofsky and Zaki (1998) showed that the dissociation between perceptual category
Can single-system models account for the data?
The modeling and empirical results presented by the single-system theorists have provoked important and useful debate within the field and have highlighted both the need for stronger experimental control over memory phenomena and the limitations of dissociation logic. We do not dispute the fact that single-system models can often account for particular dissociations, or that dissociations themselves do not compel MMS (cf. Poldrack et al., 1999b). However, we will argue here that although the
Proliferation of memory systems or parameters?
Opponents of MMS views have often posed a reductio ad absurdum in which memory systems proliferate to the point where every single dissociation is explained by a different memory system; this argument has appeared in the debate over systems versus processing theories of amnesia in the 1990s (e.g., Roediger et al., 1990) and the more recent debate over single versus multiple system models of category learning (e.g., Palmeri and Flanery, 2002). Further, it is suggested that the single-system
Neural models and the single-system approach
The models proposed by single-system theorists to account for memory dissociations have generally been simple mathematical or computational models that do not attempt to model the known neural circuitry underlying the behaviors being modeled. In contrast, there is a growing move toward models that are directly informed by the neurocomputational architecture of the relevant neural systems identified by cognitive neuroscientists, taking advantage of the recent explosion in computational
Conclusions
The study of category learning using a cognitive neuroscience approach has provided substantial insights into the cognitive and neural systems that support multiple forms of learning, yet some theorists continue to insist on the viability of a single memory system. We have argued here that, contrary to the claims of single-system theorists, the single-system approach lacks parsimony because it fails to successfully explain a large body of data from neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and animal
Acknowledgments
The work outlined here was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0223843) and Whitehall Foundation to R. Poldrack and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to K. Foerde.
References (52)
- et al.
Long-term test–retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task
Neuroimage
(2006) - et al.
Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
Neuropsychologia
(2006) - et al.
What can amnesic patients learn?
Neuropsychologia
(1976) Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal-lobe excision
Neuropsychologia
(1968)- et al.
Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning
Journal of Memory and Language
(1988) - et al.
Impaired probabilistic category learning in hypoxic subjects with hippocampal damage
Neuropsychologia
(2004) A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Journal of Memory and Language
(1991)- et al.
Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
(1996) - et al.
Memory systems and perceptual categorization
Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues—a theoretical review
Neuroimage
(2000)
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies
Neuropsychologia
How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Dopamine-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal synapses
Neural Networks
When artificial grammar acquisition in Parkinson's disease is impaired: the case of learning via trial-by-trial feedback
Brain Research
A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex
Neuroimage
Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning
Journal Of Neurophysiology
Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that
Science
Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
Secondary task effects on classification earning
Memory & Cognition
By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism
Science
From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: a computational theory
Hippocampus
Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: a single-system connectionist account
Psychological Review
The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge
Science
Cited by (142)
Information overload, stress, and emergency managerial thinking
2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionGeneralization and the hippocampus: More than one story?
2020, Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryFrontal-midline theta frequency and probabilistic learning: A transcranial alternating current stimulation study
2020, Behavioural Brain ResearchApplying Interdisciplinary Innovations to Advance Theories of Social Behavior: Response to Van Dessel and Colleagues
2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences