The identification of vertical velocity profiles using an inertial sensor to investigate pre-impact detection of falls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates distinguishing falls from normal Activities of Daily Living (ADL) by thresholding of the vertical velocity of the trunk. Also presented is the design and evaluation of a wearable inertial sensor, capable of accurately measuring these vertical velocity profiles, thus providing an alternative to optical motion capture systems.

Five young healthy subjects performed a number of simulated falls and normal ADL and their trunk vertical velocities were measured by both the optical motion capture system and the inertial sensor.

Through vertical velocity thresholding (VVT) of the trunk, obtained from the optical motion capture system, at −1.3 m/s, falls can be distinguished from normal ADL, with 100% accuracy and with an average of 323 ms prior to trunk impact and 140 ms prior to knee impact, in this subject group.

The vertical velocity profiles obtained using the inertial sensor, were then compared to those obtained using the optical motion capture system. The signals from the inertial sensor were combined to produce vertical velocity profiles using rotational mathematics and integration.

Results show high mean correlation (0.941: Coefficient of Multiple Correlations) and low mean percentage error (6.74%) between the signals generated from the inertial sensor to those from the optical motion capture system. The proposed system enables vertical velocity profiles to be measured from elderly subjects in a home environment where as this has previously been impractical.

Introduction

Falls in older people and the injuries that they sustain, are a major problem for their welfare, confidence and happiness and greatly contribute to their health costs, morbidity and mortality [1], [2]. The injuries that may occur to an older person as part of a fall can result in long-term hospitalisation which may result in a loss of independence for a faller [2].

If an older person, living alone, experiences a fall, he/she may be unable to get to a phone due to injuries sustained and could thus remain on the ground undetected for a long period. An incident such as this could have a potentially fatal outcome [3]. At the very least the elderly faller will have an increased fear-of-falling [4].

A solution to this is the automatic detection of a fall. A number of subject worn fall-detection systems and algorithms currently exist [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. They detect the impact received by the body to determine if a fall has occurred. Even though 100% fall-detection accuracies have been achieved in testing using both accelerometers [6] and gyroscopes [9], this method of fall-detection has the limitation that the fall-detection system must still be operable subsequent to the impact. Thus, a fall-detection device, capable of detecting a fall prior to impact, is highly desirable. In addition, a sensor of this type could be combined with automotive air-bag technology to reduce the number of hip fractures that occur by inflating a protective air-bag over the hip, providing trochanteric padding. A system such as this could form part of a complete fall-detection and fall injury prevention, health-monitoring home system [12] which would promote more independent living in the elderly community. Patents detailing inflatable hip protectors to cushion the fall prior to impact do exist [13], [14], [15], however they neglect to address how pre-impact detection of the falls is accomplished.

Research has been carried out into the impact dynamics of falls and has identified quantities such as trunk impact velocity, which may be used to anticipate impact from falls. These have been identified using mathematical linked models to simulate a falling person [16] and video analysis of subjects performing simulated falls onto crash mats [17], [18]. Wu [19] compared vertical and horizontal velocity profiles obtained from subjects performing normal activities and simulated forward and backward falls. Wu identified unique characteristics in the velocity profiles that enabled the detection of a fall 300–400 ms prior to impact. However, it has been argued that thresholding of the vertical velocity of the trunk alone, is sufficient for pre-impact fall-detection [20]. We thus propose implementing a subset of Wu's algorithm using data from a body worn inertial sensor, specifically, use of vertical velocity thresholding (VVT) of the trunk, using inertial sensor data to investigate pre-impact detection of falls. The context in which this work is being carried out is the real-time pre-impact detection of falls using an inertial sensor.

Conventionally, velocity characteristics of the body are obtained using laboratory based optical motion capture systems. The subjects’ movements are confined to the capture volume of the optical motion capture system and often these camera set-ups are permanently located in dedicated areas, thus limiting the activities and subjects that can be monitored. In order to allow greater investigation of fall/ADL distinction and pre-impact fall-detection, using velocity characteristics, this paper also details the development and test of a sensor and associated mathematical procedure to produce vertical velocity profiles from a subject worn sensor. This arrangement will allow the investigation of the characteristics of trunk vertical velocity profiles of the elderly while they perform their normal activities in their own homes, without the need for an optical motion capture system to be installed. We thus propose to present an algorithm which uses inertial sensor data, to obtain trunk vertical velocity profiles, which will allow us to investigate the potential, for the pre-impact detection of a fall using this sensor.

In order to determine if VVT of the trunk has the potential for pre-impact fall-detection and to examine how accurate the vertical velocity signals derived from the inertial sensor are, a number of simulated falls and ADL were performed, while the subjects’ movements were recorded using both the inertial sensor and captured using an optical motion capture system. The trunk vertical velocity profiles of subjects performing normal ADL were then compared to those produced during falls. Following this, the vertical velocity profiles obtained from a mathematical transformation of the signals from the inertial sensor were compared by amplitude and closeness in shape to the profiles from the optical motion capture system.

Section snippets

Sensor design

In this study, the radial, tangential and medio-lateral accelerations as well as pitch, yaw and roll angular velocities of the trunk, of each subject were recorded during each activity, using an inertial sensor unit consisting of a tri-axial accelerometer and tri-axial gyroscope.

Calibration

Calibration of the tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope sensors was performed using the method outlined by Ferraris et al. [21]. To compensate for the non-negligible gyroscope offset drift which occurs (considered as

Results

The maximum and minimum downward vertical velocity, vv,max, and vv,min, as well as the mean and standard deviation of the peak values for each fall and ADL, for both the inertial sensor and optical motion capture system, were recorded (Table 1). The maximum downward vertical velocity recorded from all the ADL is used as the threshold when distinguishing falls from normal ADL. The largest vv,max recorded from all the ADL performed was, −1.286 m/s for the optical motion capture system and, −1.298 

Discussion

The authors have shown that thresholding of the vertical velocity of the trunk alone, is sufficient to distinguish falls from normal ADL with 100% sensitivity (and 100% specificity, by design) and that pre-impact detection of falls with an average lead-time of 323 ms (range 155–750 ms) prior to trunk and knee impact can be achieved.

This paper also describes how vertical velocity profiles can be produced using a single inertial sensor; these profiles achieved high CMC values and low RMS error

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest exist.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of: Analog Devices, BV for providing the ADXL210 accelerometers and ADXRS300 gyroscopes and Dr. John Nelson and the CAALYX FP6 project, caalyx.eu [12], for their financial support during the write up phase of this study. Míle Buíochas.

References (25)

  • J.Y. Hwang et al.

    Development of novel algorithm and real-time monitoring ambulatory system using Bluetooth module for fall detection in the elderly

    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc

    (2004)
  • K. Doughty et al.

    The design of a practical and reliable fall detector for community and institutional telecare

    J Telemed Telecare

    (2000)
  • Cited by (125)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text