Elsevier

Manual Therapy

Volume 10, Issue 4, November 2005, Pages 239-241
Manual Therapy

Editorial
Why is the recent research regarding non-specific pain so non-specific?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2005.10.001Get rights and content

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Exploring the use of the 'Adapted Miracle Question' in the assessment of low back pain

    2011, Physiotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Most assessment methods require patients to provide a detailed history of pain, symptoms and disability, but pay scant attention to patient aspirations. Qualitative studies asking about the experience of back pain suggest that the meaning and implication of back pain varies from person to person, and there is a lack of fit between accepted paradigms of assessment, diagnosis and classification of back pain and the experience of back pain [11,12]. There are a number of moderately effective interventions for back pain, but no consensus on how they should be matched to individual patients [13].

  • Subgrouping patients with low back pain in primary care: Are we getting any better at it?

    2011, Manual Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    The question of who (at an individual level) will do best with what treatment remains unanswered from most low back pain trials and thus there has been growing interest in researching approaches to subgrouping patients. Advocates highlight that we should not discount techniques or treatments that may be beneficial to some patients purely because we have failed to identify appropriate patient subgroups (McCarthy and Cairns, 2005). Some have suggested that the current system for grouping patients in trials testing treatments for low back pain is inadequate (McCarthy and Cairns, 2005).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text