Elsevier

Learning and Individual Differences

Volume 36, December 2014, Pages 157-164
Learning and Individual Differences

Reconsidering active procrastination: Relations to motivation and achievement in college anatomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Active procrastination is multidimensional in the context of undergraduate anatomy.

  • Behavioral measures question the nature of two active procrastination factors.

  • Active procrastination factors are distinct in regard to motivation and achievement.

  • Self-efficacy moderates the effect of task value on time-usage tendencies.

  • Engaging in passive procrastination predicts low anatomy grades.

Abstract

This study examined passive and active procrastination among undergraduate anatomy students in terms of background variables, motivational beliefs (i.e., belief about the speed of knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy, and task value), and grades. Factor analysis revealed three discrete factors of active procrastination, one of which was closely tied to passive procrastination and behavioral procrastination. Analyses indicated that the relations to motivational beliefs and grades were markedly different for, on the one hand, two factors of active procrastination (positive relations) and, on the other hand, passive procrastination and the third factor of active procrastination (negative relations). After controlling for academic ability, only passive procrastination was a statistically significant predictor of grades. Results imply that the dimensions of active procrastination that appear adaptive for learning may not reflect behavioral procrastination, whereas the dimension of active procrastination that involves behavioral procrastination lacks adaptive associations.

Section snippets

Conceptions of passive and active procrastination

As defined by Choi and Moran (2009), four factors comprise active procrastination. First, outcome satisfaction indicates that the students are pleased with their results. Second, preference for pressure indicates that the students like to work quickly under deadlines. Third, intentional decision indicates that the students deliberately postpone tasks. Fourth, ability to meet deadlines indicates that the students complete activities on time. Such definitions reflect marked differences between

Motivational beliefs in relation to procrastination

Beliefs about learning inform students' academic motivation, which directs efforts toward educational goals (Eccles, 1983, Schommer, 1994). Previous research established certain motivational beliefs as adaptive due to their consistent connections to effort, persistence, and learning (Paulsen and Feldman, 2007, Wolters et al., 1996). The degree to which procrastination exhibits or lacks associations with motivational beliefs indicates whether it is adaptive or maladaptive (Corkin et al., 2011).

Academic ability and achievement in relation to procrastination

Whether scholars consider procrastination to be educationally adaptive is based on links to motivation, discussed above, as well as to academic achievement (Corkin et al., 2011). Prior research has established a strong negative association between passive procrastination and grades (Strunk and Steele, 2011, Tice and Baumeister, 1997). Conversely, college students describe intentional procrastination as having either no effect or a positive effect on grades (Schraw et al., 2007). Choi and Moran

The present study

Trends in the literature suggest a need to reexamine the factors of active procrastination with respect to variables that reflect adaptive motivation and achievement. Such analyses must account for the contribution of academic ability. There is also a need to test the construct validity of active procrastination and establish whether its factors reflect procrastination behaviorally. The present study addresses these needs, with the major purpose of examining the factors of active

Method

The following section provides an overview of participants and the measures they completed. Scales measured motivation and procrastination. Behavioral measures provided evidence of task delay.

Results

The following results examine procrastination through relations to motivational beliefs and achievement, with particular emphasis on differentiating between passive procrastination and the dimensions of active procrastination. Presented first is the factor structure of active procrastination, followed by the results of correlational analyses. Next are the regression analyses that test models predicting procrastination and achievement.

Discussion

The findings distinguished among self-reported passive procrastination and active procrastination factors in terms of motivation, achievement, and behavioral procrastination. The results demonstrated the salience of students' academic ability and beliefs about the nature, attainability, and value of learning anatomy. The study's key contributions relate to the measurement and conceptualization of active procrastination.

References (56)

  • A. Bandura

    Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory

    (1986)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy: The exercise of control

    (1997)
  • B.L. Beck et al.

    Correlates and consequences of behavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness, self-esteem, and self-handicapping

    Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

    (2000)
  • N.A. Bowman et al.

    Measuring how college affects students: Social desirability and other potential biases in college student self-reported gains

    New Directions for Institutional Research

    (2011)
  • T.M. Brinthaupt et al.

    The relationship of academic cramming to flow experience

    College Student Journal

    (2001)
  • N.H. Bui

    Effect of evaluation threat on procrastination behavior

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (2010)
  • F. Cano et al.

    Family environment, epistemological beliefs, learning strategies, and academic performance: A path analysis

  • L. Cao

    Examining “active” procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective

    Educational Psychology An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology

    (2012)
  • R.B. Cattell

    The scree test for the number of factors

    Multivariate Behavioral Research

    (1966)
  • J.N. Choi et al.

    Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (2009)
  • A.H.C. Chu et al.

    Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (2005)
  • A.B. Costello et al.

    Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis

    Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation

    (2005)
  • J.S. Eccles

    Expectancies, values and academic behaviors

  • J.S. Eccles et al.

    In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    (1995)
  • C.M. Hellman et al.

    A psychometric evaluation of the Harvey Imposter Phenomenon Scale

    Journal of Personality Assessment

    (2004)
  • L.C. Hensley et al.

    Active and passive procrastination: Overall tendencies or domain-specific behaviors? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 27–May 1, 2013

    (2013)
  • T.K. Keith

    Multiple regression and beyond

    (2006)
  • F. Kreuter et al.

    Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (2008)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Big Five personality traits predicting active procrastination at work: When self- and supervisor-ratings tell different stories

      2022, Journal of Research in Personality
      Citation Excerpt :

      That said, even though the present study suggested that supervisors perceived active procrastinators as less agreeable, these supervisory perceptions may not necessarily lead to lower or biased performance evaluations in reality, provided that supervisors are generally objective and fair and can well differentiate task from contextual performance on the job (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993). Therefore, future research seeking to examine these issues with actual performance ratings of the focal employees would be keenly useful; such examinations could also tell us whether AP benefits job performance as well as satisfaction/wellbeing at work as it does among student samples in school (Corkin et al., 2011; Habelrih & Hicks, 2015; Hensley, 2014, 2016; Kim et al., 2017; Lindt et al., 2014; Schraw et al., 2007). Further, direct interviews with supervisors might reveal more about their nuanced views of active procrastination and its impact in the workplace (e.g., asking supervisors whether AP is disturbing or understandable to them and why) which could inform us on whether or not organizations shall be more accepting of AP if future research finds AP positively contributes to employee performance and/or wellbeing.

    • Prediction of dilatory behaviour in online assignments

      2021, Learning and Individual Differences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text