Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade
Highlights
► Classroom engagement and teacher–child relationship are moderately stable. ► Classroom engagement and teacher–child relations covary along the school year. ► Teacher–child relationship in first grade forecasts fourth grade engagement. ► Engagement in first grade did not forecast Teacher–child relations in fourth grade.
Introduction
From school entry, students are confronted with important cognitive and behavioral challenges. While having to adapt to a group-based social environment, they are asked to make an effort during classroom activities, listen carefully, follow rules, participate, work autonomously, and invest considerable persistence. Children vary in their ability to respond to such expectations (Ladd, Buhs, & Seid, 2000). In turn, the behavioral responses children produce are important as they chart the developmental course toward academic success (Johnson, McGue, & Iacono, 2006; Ladd & Dinella, 2009; Skinner, Kindermann, & Furrer, 2009). For youngsters, engagement is a malleable process that evolves over time and is responsive to the interpersonal transactions in the classroom environment (Simons-Morton & Chen, 2009; Sirin & Rogers-Sirin, 2004). Beyond individual characteristics (Ladd et al., 2000; Pagani, Fitzpatrick, Archambault, & Janosz, 2010), the bond between teacher and student remains a fundamental aspect of the childhood schooling experience. Past research has shown that close and supportive responses from teachers have important implications for learning-related behaviors and achievement in students (Birch & Ladd, 1997; Furrer & Skinner, 2003; Hughes, Luo, Kwok, & Loyd, 2008; Pianta, Steinberg, & Rollins, 1995).
Until recently, there have been few studies that examine the developmental links between student engagement and teacher–student relations in primary school children. A recent study by Hughes et al. (2008) found reciprocal links between teacher–student relations, engagement, and achievement over three consecutive years. Students showing early signs of behavioral disengagement in class were at higher risk of future academic difficulties. Considering that engagement and the quality of relations with teachers are important for the academic dimension of schooling (Hamre & Pianta, 2001; Ladd & Dinella, 2009), research examining the developmental continuity of these factors is now warranted.
The concept of student engagement has inspired a number of approaches (Appleton, Christenson, & Furlong, 2008; Finn, 1989; Ladd et al., 2000). Upon conducting an extensive review of the extant literature, Fredricks, Blumenfeld, and Paris (2004) offer three dimensions which help operationalize student engagement. These are behavioral, affective, and cognitive. The affective and cognitive dimensions respectively refer to student feelings, interests, and attitudes toward school (Eccles, Wigfield, Harold, & Blumenfeld, 1993; Finn, 1989; Goodenow, 1993) and psychological investment in learning and use of self-regulation strategies (Ablard & Lipschultz, 1998; Connell & Wellborn, 1991; Pintrich & de Groot, 1990; Skinner & Belmont, 1993). The behavioral dimension of engagement refers to behavioral dispositions and conduct when approaching and undertaking school-related tasks (McDermott, Mordell, & Stoltzfus, 2001). Such behaviors include compliance to classroom rules and instructions, attention, efforts, and participation in classroom-related activities (Finn, 1989; Fredricks et al., 2004). Although the cognitive and affective dimensions of engagement remain important influences on the academic life-course (Archambault, Janosz, Fallu, & Pagani, 2009), student behavioral engagement is often seen as a reflection of affective and cognitive involvement (Archambault, Janosz, Morizot, & Pagani, 2009; Eccles, 2004; Ladd & Dinella, 2009). Moreover, classroom participation is associated with positive changes in attitudes about school (Ladd & Dinella, 2009). Early signs of classroom effort and participation chart the course toward future academic difficulties (Hughes et al., 2008). Finally, learning-related behaviors are more concrete targets for intervention (Diamond, Barnett, Thomas, & Munro, 2007). Accordingly, many studies have draw upon behavioral engagement as a key element predicting later academic adjustment.
The contribution of early behavioral engagement on student academic attainment outcomes is well established (Alexander, Entwisle, & Dauber, 1993; Ladd & Dinella, 2009; McClelland, Morrison, & Holmes, 2000; Skinner, Wellborn, & Connell, 1990; Valiente, Lemery-Chalfant, Swanson, & Reiser, 2008). For example, Ladd and Dinella (2009) followed a sample of 383 children from kindergarten to eighth grade and found that children who were cooperatively engaged in the classroom and responded to teacher demands were most likely to show academic gains over time beyond important cognitive, family, and demographic characteristics. Valiente et al. (2008) further showed that classroom participation partially mediated the link between student self-regulation and GPA even after controlling for important confounding variables such as sex, family income, parental education, and prior grades. According to Wentzel (1999), children who are actively engaged are more likely to achieve academically because they seek goals that are valued by members of their school and classroom environment. To the extent that some stability exists in engagement patterns across the primary grades (Ladd & Dinella, 2009), some children may find themselves on a continuous risk trajectory starting in the early grades. Such a trajectory may be influenced by both child characteristics and features of their learning environment. Teachers likely have an important influence on this learning environment given their level of responsibility and pedagogical objectives, in the face of heterogeneous group composition (Hijzen, Boekaerts, & Vedder, 2007).
For some authors, classroom engagement can specifically be operationalized by the quality of student involvement with classmates and teachers (Finn, 1989; Ladd et al., 2000; Skinner & Belmont, 1993; Skinner et al., 2009, 1990). For others, the relations students build with teachers do not serve as an indicator but rather, as a foundation or consequence of classroom engagement (Battistich, Solomon, Watson, & Schaps, 1997; Birch & Ladd, 1997; Marks, 2000; Rimm-Kaufman, Curby, Grimm, Nathanson, & Brock, 2009). In line with attachment theory perspectives (Bowlby, 1980), building a supportive relationship with a significant caregiver is critical for child development. Parents and teachers are the most important vehicles for socialization and among the most frequently mentioned sources of support during the school age years (Resnick et al., 1997). In classrooms that allows teachers to engage in more individualized teaching (Blatchford, Bassett, & Brown, 2011), the supportive reciprocal relationship teachers develop with their students becomes an important predictor of day-to-day engagement, which enables children to consolidate the emotional security needed to explore their social environment and cope with academic challenges. An observational study by Ponitz, Rimm-Kaufman, Grimm, and Curby (2009) using a sample of 171 kindergarteners found that classroom and teacher–student relationship quality is indirectly associated with children's reading ability through improvements in classroom engagement. According to their study, when classroom organization and teacher emotional and instructional support are high, children successfully adopt learning-related behaviors which contribute to their academic success. Other research shows that when teachers present themselves as warm, supportive, and responsive to individual needs, students respond with better behavioral engagement in the classroom and achievement (Brophy, 1983; Connell & Wellborn, 1991; Hamre & Pianta, 2001; Hughes et al., 2008; McWilliam, Scarborough, & Kim, 2003; Wentzel, 1999). In some cases, a close and supportive relationship with teachers may even attenuate risks associated with prior underachievement and buffer children against the negative effects of family or sociodemographic adversity (Resnick et al., 1997); while conversely, negative and controlling teacher behaviors can have a negative influence (Assor, Kaplan, Kanat-Maymon, & Roth, 2005)
Most importantly, the associations between teacher–student relationship and student engagement could also be viewed as transactional (Sameroff & Fiese, 1990; Skinner, Furrer, Marchand, & Kindermann, 2008). This idea implies, on one hand, that students who perceive their teacher as being supportive might be more responsive to academic expectations and demands and tend to be better engaged in classroom-related activities. In support of this view, longitudinal findings indicate that negative changes in Teacher–child relations are associated with a decline in student achievement, even after controlling for important variables such as IQ (Hamre & Pianta, 2001). On the other hand, students who show classroom involvement follow directives and instructions, and work neatly and cooperatively could reinforce positive teacher attitudes and support. That is, student self-regulation in the classroom generates more positive and spontaneous reciprocal responses from teachers, which can ultimately promote their achievement-related outcomes (Koriat, 2012; Rimm-Kaufman et al., 2009).
Previous findings suggest that student engagement and relationships with teachers underscore transactional processes which set the stage for short and long-term educational progress. Consistent with this body of work, we used a population-based data set of French-speaking Canadian children from Quebec (Canada) to conduct a more in-depth examination of the links between classroom engagement and teacher–student relations and address their developmental course from first grade through fourth grade. Given the notion of developmental continuity, our initial hypothesis was that first grade classroom engagement would be positively associated with fourth grade engagement (hypothesis 1). Second, we expected that students who share a close relationship with their first grade teacher would also share a close relationship with their fourth grade teacher (hypothesis 2). Third, we anticipated that classroom engagement and close teacher–student relations would covary along the same school year, in first and fourth grade (hypothesis 3). Finally, we expect that these two dimensions would transact over time. That is, classroom engagement in first grade should predict teacher–student close relations in fourth grade (hypothesis 4a) and close teacher–student relations in first grade should be positively associated with classroom engagement in fourth grade (hypothesis 4b).
Section snippets
Participants and procedure
The Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD) originates from a randomly selected birth cohort born between 1997 and 1998 in the Canadian province of Quebec.1 The Institut de la Statistique du Québec obtained informed consent from parents at all survey points and coordinated the data collection procedures. The QLSCD comprises an infancy/early childhood phase and a school age phase.
For the infancy/early
Measurement model
We first used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFAs) to calculate one-factor congeneric models of classroom engagement and teacher–student relations at grades 1 and 4. Table 1 reports the fit indices for each model. Overall, this table indicates that each measure of classroom engagement and teacher–student relations shows good modeling of the data. The RMSEA for teacher–student relations in first and fourth grade was slightly above the .06 standard; however, the SRMR, TLI, and CFI reached an ideal
Discussion
Academic success, as an objective, requires more than cognitive skills. Adequate task-focused classroom behavior has more often than not been neglected in the achievement literature. More importantly, how these transact with the school environment has received even less attention. With this in mind, the goal of the study was to comprehensively evaluate the early classroom experience as a developmental milestone toward future academic success. We evaluated the prospective developmental stability
References (72)
- et al.
Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument
Journal of School Psychology
(2006) - et al.
Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout
Journal of Adolescence
(2009) - et al.
Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety
Learning and Instruction
(2005) - et al.
The Teacher–child relationship and children's early school adjustment
Journal of School Psychology
(1997) - et al.
Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction: differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools
Learning and Instruction
(2011) - et al.
Exploring the links between students' engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom
Learning and Instruction
(2007) - et al.
The consistency of perceived Teacher–child relationships between preschool and kindergarten
Journal of School Psychology
(2000) The relationships between monitoring, regulation and performance
Learning and Instruction
(2012)- et al.
Children at risk for early academic problems: the role of learning-related social skills
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2000) - et al.
A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models
Journal of Business Research
(2005)
Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender
Journal of Educational Psychology
Factor analysis and AIC
Psychometrika
First-grade classroom behavior: its short- and long-term consequences for school performance
Child Development
Relationships among teachers' and students' thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement
The Alberta Journal of Educational Research
Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Psychology in the Schools
Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: relationship to dropout
Journal of School Health
Caring school communities
Educational Psychologist
Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Psychological Bulletin
Executive functions and school readiness intervention: impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start-REDI program
Development and Psychopathology
Conceptualizing students' motivation
Educational Psychologist
Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance
Structural Equation Modeling
Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes
Preschool program improves cognitive control
Science
School readiness and later achievement
Developmental Psychology
Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Adaptation française du Peabody Picture Vocabulary test-revised
Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit
Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school
Child Development
Withdrawing from school
Review of Educational Research
School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence
Review of Educational Research
Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance
Journal of Educational Psychology
Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: relationships to motivation and achievement
Journal of Early Adolescence
Preschool programs can boost school readiness
Science
Multivariate data analysis
Early Teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade
Child Development
Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children
Science
Cited by (61)
The joint operations of teacher-student and peer relationships on classroom engagement among low-achieving elementary students: A longitudinal multilevel study
2024, Contemporary Educational PsychologyImpact of student-teacher relationship quality on classroom behavioral engagement for young students on the autism spectrum
2022, Research in Autism Spectrum DisordersCitation Excerpt :However, it is unclear how these two factors (i.e., student behavioral engagement and STR quality) may impact one another over time among this population of students. Although several previous studies suggest that STR quality unidirectionally promotes behavioral engagement (e.g., Archambault et al., 2013; Engels et al., 2016), some work supports reciprocal effects between STR quality and engagement over time (Hughes et al., 2008). Notably, none of the aforementioned studies were conducted with autistic students.
Longitudinal associations among teacher–child relationship quality, behavioral engagement, and academic achievement
2022, Early Childhood Research Quarterly