International Consultation on Sexual Medicine Report
Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

A detailed sexual history is the cornerstone for all sexual problem assessments and sexual dysfunction diagnoses. Diagnostic evaluation is based on an in-depth sexual history, including sexual and gender identity and orientation, sexual activity and function, current level of sexual function, overall health and comorbidities, partner relationship and interpersonal factors, and the role of cultural and personal expectations and attitudes.

Aim

To propose key steps in the diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunctions, with special focus on the use of symptom scales and questionnaires.

Methods

Critical assessment of the current literature by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine committee.

Main Outcome Measures

A revised algorithm for the management of sexual dysfunctions, level of evidence, and recommendation for scales and questionnaires.

Results

The International Consultation on Sexual Medicine proposes an updated algorithm for diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunction in men and women, with specific recommendations for sexual history taking and diagnostic evaluation. Standardized scales, checklists, and validated questionnaires are additional adjuncts that should be used routinely in sexual problem evaluation. Scales developed for specific patient groups are included. Results of this evaluation are presented with recommendations for clinical and research uses.

Conclusion

Defined principles, an algorithm and a range of scales may provide coherent and evidence based management for sexual dysfunctions.

Introduction

Committee 3 of the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM) reviewed a large body of relevant publications on the diagnostic evaluation of sexual function in men and women, including advances in specialized testing for women and men and the development of scales and questionnaires for evaluating sexual dysfunction (SD) in women and men. We report the findings and recommendations of the committee for the overall diagnostic approach and assessment algorithm for evaluation of male and female SDs and the use of symptom scales and questionnaires in particular to assist in the evaluation. The committee also considered current scientific and regulatory requirements for the development and validation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and cultural and clinical considerations when using these assessments.

Section snippets

Principles of Sexual Medicine

The committee endorses three basic principles for clinical evaluation and management of sexual problems in men and women. These are briefly as follows:

  • Principle 1—adoption of a patient-centered framework, with emphasis on cultural competence in clinical practice

  • Principle 2—application of evidence-based principles in diagnostic and treatment planning

  • Principle 3—use of a similar management framework for men and women

When taken together, these three principles provide a balanced and integrated

Part 2. Questionnaires and symptom scales for sexual problem assessment

Broadly speaking, two different self-report measurements have been developed for SD: (i) screening checklists that provide clinicians and researchers with an indication of whether patients are experiencing sexual problems and (ii) multidimensional questionnaires that provide more in-depth evaluation of the patient’s current sexual function and/or sexual well-being. This section provides readers with an overview of commonly used scales and questionnaires, including their major strengths and

Conclusion

  • 1.

    Self-report questionnaires and symptom scales provide a valuable adjunct to clinical care or outcomes research in male and female SD. However, these measurements should not be used as a substitute for face-to-face clinical interaction with the patient or detailed sexual history taking.

  • 2.

    Multiple scales and questionnaires have been reviewed in this article (Table 1). Strengths and limitations of each measurement have been evaluated.

  • 3.

    Strengths include standardized and efficient measurement of

Statement of authorship

Category 1

  1. (a)

    Conception and Design

    • D. Hatzichristou; P.S. Kirana; L. Banner; S. Althof; R. Lonnee-Hoffman; L. Dennerstein; R. Rosen

  2. (b)

    Acquisition of Data

    • D. Hatzichristou; P.S. Kirana; L. Banner; S. Althof; R. Lonnee-Hoffman; L. Dennerstein; R. Rosen

  3. (c)

    Analysis and Interpretation of Data

    • D. Hatzichristou; P.S. Kirana; L. Banner; S. Althof; R. Lonnee-Hoffman; L. Dennerstein; R. Rosen

Category 2
  1. (a)

    Drafting the Article

    • D. Hatzichristou; P.S. Kirana; L. Banner; S. Althof; R. Lonnee-Hoffman; L. Dennerstein; R. Rosen

  2. (b)

    Revising It for

References (87)

  • F. Quirk et al.

    The use of the sexual function questionnaire as a screening tool for women with sexual dysfunction

    J Sex Med

    (2005)
  • L. Derogatis et al.

    Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder

    J Sex Med

    (2008)
  • J.H. Bae et al.

    Development of a Korean version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale

    J Sex Med

    (2006)
  • J.S. Carpenter et al.

    Using an FSDS-R item to screen for sexually related distress: A MsFLASH analysis

    Sex Med

    (2015)
  • T. Sills et al.

    The Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F): item response analyses of data from women diagnosed with hypoactive sexual desire disorder

    J Sex Med

    (2005)
  • A.H. Clayton et al.

    Validation of the sexual interest and desire inventory-female in hypoactive sexual desire disorder

    J Sex Med

    (2010)
  • R.C. Rosen et al.

    The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction

    Urology

    (1997)
  • R.C. Rosen et al.

    Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale

    Eur Urol

    (2011)
  • R.C. Rosen et al.

    Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ): scale development and psychometric validation

    Urology

    (2004)
  • R.C. Rosen et al.

    Development and validation of four-item version of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess ejaculatory dysfunction

    Urology

    (2007)
  • D.L. Patrick et al.

    Premature ejaculation: an observational study of men and their partners

    J Sex Med

    (2005)
  • D.L. Patrick et al.

    Interrelationships among measures of premature ejaculation: the central role of perceived control

    J Sex Med

    (2007)
  • S. Althof et al.

    Development and validation of a new questionnaire to assess sexual satisfaction, control, and distress associated with premature ejaculation

    J Sex Med

    (2006)
  • K.E. Flynn et al.

    Development of the NIH PROMIS (R) Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer

    J Sex Med

    (2013)
  • J.T. Wei et al.

    Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

    Urology

    (2000)
  • P.T. Jensen et al.

    Longitudinal study of sexual function and vaginal changes after radiotherapy for cervical cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2003)
  • H. Bisseriex et al.

    Sexual Dysfunction Management and Expectations Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis-Female (SEA-MS-F): creation and validation of a specific questionnaire

    J Sex Med

    (2014)
  • R.G. Rogers et al.

    A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2001)
  • S. Jawed-Wessel et al.

    The Sexual Function Questionnaire's Medical Impact Scale (SFQ-MIS): validation among a sample of first-time mothers

    J Sex Med

    (2013)
  • M.K. De Boer et al.

    The Antipsychotics and Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (ASFQ): preliminary evidence for reliability and validity

    Schizophr Res

    (2013)
  • W.J. Hellstrom et al.

    Bother and distress associated with Peyronie's disease: validation of the Peyronie’s disease questionnaire

    J Urol

    (2013)
  • K.S. Coyne et al.

    Responsiveness of the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)

    J Sex Med

    (2015)
  • K.S. Coyne et al.

    The test-retest reliability of the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire

    J Sex Med

    (2015)
  • D. Herbenick et al.

    Development and validation of the female genital self-image scale

    J Sex Med

    (2010)
  • D. Herbenick et al.

    The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): results from a nationally representative probability sample of women in the United States

    J Sex Med

    (2011)
  • D. Herbenick et al.

    The development and validation of the Male Genital Self-Image Scale: results from a nationally representative probability sample of men in the United States

    J Sex Med

    (2013)
  • S.E. Althof et al.

    EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction

    Urology

    (1999)
  • R. Lewis et al.

    Patient and partner satisfaction with Viagra (sildenafil citrate) treatment as determined by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Urology

    (2001)
  • J.C. Cappelleri et al.

    Association between the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire following treatment with sildenafil citrate for men with erectile dysfunction

    Value Health

    (2005)
  • A. Fugl-Meyer et al.

    Aspects of sexual satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction: a factor analytic and logistic regression approach

    J Sex Med

    (2009)
  • R. Rosen et al.

    The Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) is a sensitive measure of treatment effectiveness for both patients and partners: results of a randomized controlled trial with vardenafil

    J Sex Med

    (2007)
  • D.B. Dibenedetti et al.

    The treatment satisfaction scale: a multidimensional instrument for the assessment of treatment satisfaction for erectile dysfunction patients and their partners

    Eur Urol

    (2005)
  • E. Huyghe et al.

    Erectile dysfunction in end-stage liver disease men

    J Sex Med

    (2009)
  • Cited by (98)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

    Funding: None.

    View full text