GastrointestinalPatient-provider relationships and health outcomes among hepatopancreatobiliary patients
Introduction
A strong patient-provider relationship (PPR) is critical to the effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease. Historically, this relationship could be described as benevolent paternalism, in which information and advice was delivered from physician to patient.1 With cultural shifts toward patient empowerment and autonomy, as well as increasing access to medical information on the internet, the PPR has evolved such that many patients now exercise primary authority over health care decisions.1, 2 More recently, a shared decision-making model in which informed patients make decisions in conjunction with their health care providers has been popularized.1, 3 The PPR has both emotional and cognitive components. The emotional factors focus on mutual respect, trust, support, and empathy, whereas cognitive factors include information gathering, patient education, and counseling.4 Both domains are important, and several observational studies have noted a correlation between the quality of the PPR and health care outcomes.5, 6, 7 Indeed, interventions focused on improving the PPR have consistently demonstrated a small but significant effect on health care outcomes.8
There are few studies examining the association between the PPR and health care outcomes among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) diseases. HPB diseases represent a heterogeneous group of infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic disorders that require consultation with specialized providers.9 Management of HPB diseases often require multiple visits with providers, potentially invasive tests and therapeutic procedures, as well as frequent strict adherence to medications.9 In addition, the direct and indirect costs of diagnosing and treating HPB diseases can be high for patients and the health care system.10, 11 Surgery for HPB diseases can also be associated with higher than average risk of complications, as well as prolonged hospitalization and/or readmission.12, 13, 14 Given the large resource needs of patients with HPB conditions, the quality of the PPR may be a particularly important determinant of health care outcomes. In addition, a better understanding of predictors of poor PPR and the association of the PPR and health care outcomes might help identify appropriate patient populations for targeted interventions.
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) database is a prospectively maintained collection of surveys completed by patients and medical providers that is the most comprehensive source of data covering health care cost and utilization in the United States.15 Using this database, the objective of the present study was to identify clinical predictors of poor PPR among patients with HPB diseases. In particular, we sought to define the relationship between PPR quality and health care outcomes, including emergency room (ER) utilization, inpatient hospital admissions, and health care expenditures.
Section snippets
Study design and patient population
Institutional Review Board consent was waived for this study given the use of publically available deidentified data. The MEPS database from 2008-2014 was queried to identify all patients with HPB conditions based on the following diagnosis codes: 006 hepatitis; 016 cancer of liver and intrahepatic bile duct; 017 cancer of pancreas; 149 biliary tract diseases; 151 benign liver diseases including cirrhosis; and 152 pancreatic disorders. Surveys of patients younger than 18 y, individuals with a
Results
A total of 592 participants, representing six million noninstitutionalized US adults with an HPB diagnosis, met inclusion criteria. Underlying diagnoses included cholelithiasis and other diseases of the biliary tract (n = 302, 51%), benign liver diseases including cirrhosis (n = 121, 20%), pancreatic disorders (n = 81, 14%), hepatitis (n = 75, 13%), cancer of liver and intrahepatic bile duct (n = 10, 2%), and cancer of pancreas (n = 3, 1%). The proportion of respondents with self-rated poor PPR
Discussion
The PPR is important to patient satisfaction, as well as the key component of successful therapeutic relationships between patients and caregivers. Among patients with HPB diseases, which can be complex and involve multiple different providers and multiple different treatment modalities, a robust PPR may be particularly important. Despite the importance of PPR, data on factors associated with PPR and health care outcomes is scarce. The present study was therefore important as we utilized the
Acknowledgment
E.C., E.W.B., J.C., Q.C., A.P., S.S., J.M.C., and T.M.P. participated in the design of this project, interpretation of data, drafting and critical revision of the article, and provided final approval of the version to be submitted. Q.C. completed the data collection and analysis.
Presented at the 14th Annual Academic Surgical Congress, Jacksonville, FL, February 2018.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References (29)
- et al.
Treatment of pancreatic cancer: a narrative review of cost-effectiveness studies
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol
(2013) - et al.
The timing of complications impacts risk of readmission after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery
Surgery
(2014) - et al.
Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study
HPB (Oxford)
(2015) - et al.
Patient-provider communication and health outcomes among individuals with hepato-pancreato-biliary disease in the USA
J Gastrointest Surg
(2018) - et al.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and the risk of diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing resection versus observation
J Gastrointest Surg
(2015) Patients and doctors — the evolution of a relationship
N Engl J Med
(2012)- et al.
Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review
J Med Internet Res
(2017) - et al.
Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness: a systematic review
JAMA Intern Med
(2015) - et al.
Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis
Med Care
(2009) - et al.
Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations
BMJ
(2001)
Exploring the role of the patient–physician relationship on insulin adherence and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: insights from the MOSAIc study
J Diabetes
Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials
Ann Fam Med
The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
PLoS One
Cited by (7)
Pent-up demand for total shoulder arthroplasty prior to Medicare eligibility at age 65 years: evidence from a national patient database and national survey data
2023, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryClinician–Patient Relationships in Virtual Care: A Dimensional Analysis of the Symbolic World of Cancer Care
2023, Qualitative Health ResearchThe Challenge of Coming Out to Providers by Gay and Bisexual Men With Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Results from the Restore Study
2021, International Journal of Sexual HealthThe Mediating Role of Shared Decision-Making in the Effect of the Patient–Physician Relationship on Compliance With Treatment
2021, Journal of Patient ExperienceThe role of patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life and pain in cancer patients
2020, Supportive Care in Cancer