Elsevier

Journal of School Psychology

Volume 69, August 2018, Pages 56-72
Journal of School Psychology

Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A large scale study of U.S. students in grades 3–11

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to evaluate a large-scale implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program with children and youth in grades 3–11 in the U.S. Two major sets of analyses are presented, one following 210 schools over two years (Study 1; n = 70,998 at baseline) and the other following a subsample of 95 schools over three years (Study 2; n = 31,675 at baseline). Schools were located in 49 counties in central and western Pennsylvania. The Mplus 7.0 program was used to analyze the data which had a multilevel structure, with students nested in schools and program effects based on school-aggregated outcome variables. For almost all grades, there were clear reductions in the two key dimensions, being bullied and bullying other students. Average Absolute Change amounted to approximately 3%, implying that almost 2000 students had escaped being bullied in the two-year study. School-level Cohen's d's were large or fairly large. The longitudinal analyses documented increases in students' expressions of empathy with bullied peers, marked decreases in their willingness to join in bullying, and perceptions that their primary teacher had increased his or her efforts to address bullying. Overall, effects were stronger the longer the program had been in place. The analyses provided strong support for the effectiveness of the OBPP with U.S. students in elementary, middle, and early high school grades in Pennsylvania schools. Future research is warranted to assess program effectiveness in different racial/ethnic and community settings and to examine the relation between fidelity of implementation and outcomes.

Section snippets

Brief description of the OBPP

The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP; Olweus, 1991, Olweus, 1993, Olweus and Limber, 2010a, Olweus and Limber, 2010b) is the oldest and one of the most researched bullying prevention programs in the world. It represents a whole-school comprehensive approach that includes schoolwide, classroom, individual, and community components. The program is focused on both short-term and long-term change that will create a safe and positive school environment. The overarching goals of the OBPP are

Participants

The original sample included students in grades 3–12 who were drawn from schools that were involved in a wide-scale effort to implement the OBPP in elementary, middle, and high schools in 49 counties in southern and central Pennsylvania (Limber & Olweus, 2017). Our target population in this study consisted of students from schools that had completed successful standard implementation of the OBPP, as determined by the minimum criterion that the school had conducted the Olweus Bullying

Results

Results are presented in two sections. The first section reports analyses of possible program effects with respect to being bullied and bullying others for the full sample of students over two years (Study 1). Detailed analyses by grade and grade-groupings are provided, in addition to analyses by sex and race/ethnicity. The second section provides more detailed examinations of longer-term effects (over three years) for the sub-group of 95 schools for whom such data were available (Study 2). In

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a large-scale implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program with children and youth in grades 3–11 in the United States. Given increasing concerns about the markedly negative short- and long-term effects of being bullied on individuals who are targeted (Olweus, 2013; Ttofi et al., 2011a) and evidence that regular engagement in bullying other students is related to later antisocial and criminal behavior (Olweus, 1993, Olweus, 2011; Ttofi et

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by generous funding from the Highmark Foundation. The authors wish to thank The Highmark Foundation, colleagues at the Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, and colleagues at the Center for Schools and Communities for their remarkable support of the intervention program and evaluation.

References (65)

  • D.P. Farrington et al.

    School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization: A systematic review

    Campbell Systematic Reviews

    (2009)
  • R.M. Gladden et al.

    Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta

  • R.H. Heck et al.

    An introduction to multilevel modelling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus

    (2015)
  • L. Hedges

    Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs

    Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

    (2007)
  • L. Hedges

    Effect sizes in three-level cluster-randomized experiments

    Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

    (2011)
  • J.S. Hong et al.

    A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis

    Aggression and Violent Behavior

    (2012)
  • C.M. Judd et al.

    Estimating the effects of social interventions

    (1981)
  • J.H. Kallestad et al.

    School climate reports from Norwegian teachers: A methodological and substantive study

    School Effectiveness and School Improvement

    (1998)
  • A. Kärnä et al.

    Going to scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1–9

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2011)
  • A. Kärnä et al.

    A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6

    Child Development

    (2011)
  • S.P. Limber

    Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: Lessons learned from the field

  • S.P. Limber et al.

    Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention programme in the southeastern United States

  • S.P. Limber et al.

    Lessons learned from scaling-up the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program

  • H. Luxenberg et al.

    Bullying in U.S. schools: 2014 status report

    (2015)
  • M.G. Masiello et al.

    A public health approach to bullying prevention

    (2014)
  • B.O. Muthén et al.

    Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory

    Psychological Methods

    (2012)
  • L.K. Muthén et al.

    Mplus User's Guide

    (2012)
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

    Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice

    (2016)
  • National Center for Education Statistics

    What are locale codes?

  • Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children

    Ending the torment: Tackling bullying from the schoolyard to cyberspace

    (2016)
  • D. Olweus

    Hackkycklingar och översittare. Forskning om skolmobbing

    (1973)
  • D. Olweus

    Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys

    (1978)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    The first two authors contributed equally to this article.

    View full text