Teachers' views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students' coping with peer victimization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

A multilevel design was used to test a model in which teachers' attitudes (beliefs) about bullying (e.g., it is normative; assertive children do not get bullied; children wouldn't be bullied if they avoided mean kids) were hypothesized to influence if and how they intervene in bullying interactions. In turn, it was hypothesized that teachers' strategies would influence how their students cope with victimization and the frequency of victimization reported by their students. Data were gathered on 34 2nd and 4th grade teachers and 363 ethnically-diverse students (188 boys; 175 girls; M age = 9 years 2 months). Results indicated that teachers were not likely to intervene if they viewed bullying as normative behavior, but were more likely to intervene if they held either assertion or avoidant beliefs. Moreover, avoidant beliefs were predictive of separating students which was then associated both directly and indirectly (via reduced revenge seeking) with lower levels of peer victimization. No grade differences emerged for teachers' views or management strategies; however, minor sex differences were detected which will be discussed.

Section snippets

Participants

Teachers and their students from four public elementary schools in the Southwestern United States, serving primarily low-to-middle income families (as measured by percent of students who received free lunches: 26%, 56%, 79% and 95% for the four schools), participated in the present study. Schools were selected to represent the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of the community. All 34 (31 female; 3 male) second (n = 19) and fourth (n = 15) grade teachers agreed to allow their students to

Results

Preliminary analyses were first conducted to test hypotheses regarding sex and grade mean group differences among the variables. Next, correlations between teachers' views regarding peer victimization and their use of specific strategies for managing bullying in their classroom were computed separately for boys and girls. Lastly, multilevel modeling using Mplus 3.1 was used to test the model that teachers' beliefs of bullying influence their use of management strategies, which in turn, is

Discussion

The present study was designed to address three primary issues. First, we examined if the beliefs teachers hold about bullying and the strategies they use to handle such incidences vary as a function of the sex and grade of their students. Second, we investigated how such beliefs may influence teachers' responses to bullying. Third, it was of interest to determine if the management strategies teachers used to handle victimization were predictive of student-reported levels of peer victimization

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on a Master's thesis completed by the second author under the advisement of the first author. Preparation of this project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant #0318462 awarded to Becky Kochenderfer-Ladd, Arizona State University. We would like to thank the principals, teachers, students and parents of Keller, Loma Linda, Mendoza, and Orangedale Elementary Schools for their participation.

References (35)

  • S. Bauman et al.

    Knowledge and beliefs about bullying in schools: Comparing pre-service teachers in the Unites States and the United Kingdom

    School Psychology International

    (2005)
  • M.G. Borg

    Secondary school teachers' perception of pupils' undesirable behaviors

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1998)
  • M.J. Boulton

    Teachers' views on bullying: Definitions, attitudes and ability to cope

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1997)
  • M.W. Browne et al.

    Alternative ways of assessing model fit

  • D.L. Causey et al.

    Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children

    Journal of Clinical Child Psychology

    (1992)
  • T. Chung et al.

    Children's goals and strategies in peer conflict situations

    Merrill-Palmer Quarterly

    (1996)
  • W.M. Craig et al.

    Prospective teachers' attitudes toward bullying and victimization

    School Psychology International

    (2000)
  • D.R. Dupper et al.

    Low-level violence: A neglected aspect of school culture

    Urban Education

    (2002)
  • L.D. Hanish et al.

    The expression and regulation of negative emotions: Risks factors for young children's peer victimization

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2004)
  • L.D. Hanish et al.

    The social context of young children's peer victimization

    Social Development

    (2005)
  • L.T. Hu et al.

    Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (1998)
  • S.C. Hunter et al.

    Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer-aggression and bullying: The influence of school-stage, gender, victimization, appraisal, and emotion

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (2004)
  • B.J. Kochenderfer et al.

    Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment

    Child Development

    (1996)
  • B.J. Kochenderfer et al.

    Victimized children's responses to peers' aggression: Behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization

    Development and Psychopathology

    (1997)
  • B.J. Kochenderfer-Ladd et al.

    Children's coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization

    Developmental Psychology

    (2002)
  • C.M. Kokkinos et al.

    Perceived seriousness of pupils' undesirable behaviors: The student teachers' perspective

    Educational Psychology

    (2004)
  • S.M. Kristensen et al.

    The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying

    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

    (2003)
  • Cited by (248)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article was accepted under Dr. Pianta's editorship.

    View full text