An examination of the first/second-grade form of the pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance: Factor structure and stability by grade and gender across groups of economically disadvantaged children
Section snippets
Research on the dimensionality of the PSPCSA
The theoretical basis of the PSPCSA rests on a 4-factor theoretical structure but the original construct validation study supported a 2-factor, rather than a 4-factor, solution for both the PK and the FS forms of the measure: Competence (comprised of Cognitive and Physical Competence) and Acceptance (comprised of Peer and Maternal Acceptance) (Harter & Pike, 1984). Harter and Pike interpreted this finding as evidence that young children are capable of domain specificity but also that they do
Participants
Participants were three cohorts (N1 = 109, N2 = 106, N3 = 93) of prior Head Start attendees who had transitioned to public schools in a Midwestern suburban district. These children had attended a Head Start center serving approximately 130 children per year and were part of a transition-to-school study. We used each sample to accomplish different purposes in this investigation as information was not collected longitudinally on the PSPCSA for all three cohorts. Specifically, we used second-grade data
Measures
Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance-First/Second-Grade Form (PSPCSA-FS; Harter & Pike, 1984). Three PSPCSA-FS subscales were individually administered to the sample. The scales included cognitive, physical, and peer competence and each comprised 6 items scored on a four-point scale (1 = low competence or acceptance, 4 = high competence or acceptance).
The administration procedure is as follows: A version with pictures of boys or girls is used to correspond to the examinee's
Internal consistency reliability
Table 1 contains internal consistency reliability coefficients (coefficient alpha) computed separately for each group for the three subscale scores and the total score. Coefficient alphas ranged from .45 to .84 and .52 to .90 for the first-grade and second-grade data respectively. It is noteworthy that internal consistency reliabilities were in the acceptable range for the Peer Acceptance subscale and the total scale scores across time and gender. Coefficients ranged from .81 to .87 for the
Discussion
In this study we found support for a 3-factor model of children's self-competence beliefs using the PSPCSA-FS form with samples of economically disadvantaged children and provided evidence that this model was essentially invariant across time (first and second grades). Although we uncovered issues of concern related to the scale's reliability we also found noteworthy gender differences on the likelihood of item endorsement across the three factors examined in the study. Specific findings are
References (77)
- et al.
Secondary prevention as context for assessing change processes in aggressive children
Journal of School Psychology
(2000) - et al.
The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence
- et al.
Ten-year review of rating scales: III. Scales assessing suicidality, cognitive style, and self-esteem
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
Structural equation analyses of clinical subpopulation differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
(1994) Standards for educational and psychological testing
(1999)- et al.
The relationship of five-year-olds' academic readiness and perceptions of competence and acceptance
Journal of Educational Research
(1985) - et al.
The role of maternal acceptance in the relation between community violence exposure and child functioning
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
(2006) - et al.
Self-report measures for use with children: A review and comment
Journal of Clinical Psychology
(1988) Structural equations with latent variables
(1989)- et al.
Changes in self-perceptions of competence and intrinsic motivation among elementary school children
British Journal of Educational Psychology
(2003)
Revolutions and evolutions in current educational testing
Reporting about the self: Issues and implications
Measuring self-concept across the life span
Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
Psychometric properties of a pictorial self-concept scale among young learning disabled pupils
Psychology in the Schools
Individual differences in children's recall and suggestibility: The effect of intelligence, temperament, and self-perceptions
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement
Journal of Educational Psychology
Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study
Journal of Educational Psychology
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling
Psychological Bulletin
The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design
Child Development
Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes
Child Development
A meta-analysis of measures on self-esteem for young children: A framework for future measures
Child Development
The development of early self-conceptions: Their relevance for motivational processes
Age and gender differences in children's self-and task perceptions during elementary school
Child Development
The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance: Does it work with low-income children?
Child Development
Reliability
The MIMIC model as a method for detecting DIF: Comparison with Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and IRT Likelihood Ratio
Applied Psychological Measurement
An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data
Psychological Methods
Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias
Child Development
Age differences in the symptoms of depression: A latent trait analysis
Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences
An application of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Acceptance within an epidemiological survey
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Experimental, quasi-experimental and nonexperimental design and analysis with latent variables
The perceived competence scale for children
Child Development
The role of competence in children's creation of imaginary friends
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance
Child Development
Cited by (18)
Peer acceptance and rejection in childhood and adolescence
2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First EditionLongitudinal pathways of victimization, substance use, and delinquency: Findings from the National Survey of Adolescents
2011, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Latent variable framework, or structural equation modeling, was implemented using LISREL (Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1993). First, each latent construct (i.e., high risk behavior and victimization) was fit individually at each time point, followed by fitting measurement models for both latent constructs over time to establish that the constructs were measured similarly at Wave 1 and 2 (French & Mantzicopoulos, 2007). A cross-lagged structural model was then fit to the latent variables (see Figs. 1–3), to examine the relation between high risk behavior and victimization over time.
Is perceived motor competence a constraint in childrens action planning?
2009, Journal of Genetic PsychologyA bibliometric analysis and literature review on emotional skills
2023, Frontiers in Psychology
- 1
Tel.: +1 765 494 7247; fax: +1 765 496 1228.