Original researchEccentric hamstring strength deficit and poor hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio are risk factors for hamstring strain injury in football: A prospective study of 146 professional players
Introduction
Hamstring strain injuries (HSI) remain a significant concern in professional football, because of the amount of time away from the sport and a declined level of performance for the injured athlete. HSI represent 10–12% of overall injuries and more than one-third of all muscle injuries in elite soccer.1, 2 The injury incidence of HSI has increased over the past decade.3 The recurrence rates range from 12% to 41% during the first year of returning to play.4, 5, 6 Understanding the multifactorial risk factors and mechanisms of this injury are crucial for developing effective injury prevention measures.7, 8
The majority of the HSI in elite football players occur during high-speed running, which involves rapid eccentric hamstring muscle contraction.9, 10, 6 Intrinsic risk factors leading to an increased risk of HSI may be identified from previous studies. Such risk factors include previous injury of HSI,11, 12, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16 older age,14, 15, 17 reduced hamstring strength,17, 18 reduced quadriceps strength,19, 18 lower hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) strength ratio,20, 21, 19, 22 bilateral difference in hamstring fascicle length,23 and bilateral difference in hamstring strength,17, 19 but results from different studies are conflicting. Variations in methodology and testing protocols compromise the comparison between published data in the literature, which may contribute to those contradicting results.21
A large prospective cohort study on professional football players has shown lower isokinetic eccentric hamstring strength at 60 deg s−1 (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0–1.9; p = 0.04) and lower concentric isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60 deg s−1 (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0–1.9; p = 0.04) as weak risk factors of HSI, while bilateral difference of hamstring strength measures were not.18 Croisier et al.21 suggested that a concentric H/Q ratio (Con 60/Con 60) lower than 0.55 is associated with injury risk of HSI (RR = 2.89, 95% CI, 1.0–8.3, p < 0.05). Fousekis et al.13 found that eccentric isokinetic hamstring strength asymmetries at 60 and 180 deg s−1 correlated with increased risk of HSI, while H/Q ratio (Ecc 180/Con 180) did not. A meta-analysis study suggested that hamstring peak torque and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H/Q) ratio require further research to warrant their involvement in HSI because of inconclusive results, or small sample sizes.14
Despite an ample amount of literature exploring the topic, the relationship between hamstring injuries and isokinetic strength deficits remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether preseason isokinetic strength measures were predictive of future HSI among professional football players. The secondary aim was to determine potential risk factors and their confounding factors that associated with increased risk of HSI.
Section snippets
Methods
The prospective cohort study was approved by the university clinical research ethics committee. The sample consisted 169 professional football players, who were from six teams of the top national football league. These teams had football training every day and 1–2 weekly official matches during the competitive season. Players who participate in the first-team training were invited and signed written informed consents.
Players participated in the isokinetic testing session during the pre-season
Results
Twenty-three players who were unable to complete the isokinetic strength test were excluded from this study. A total of 146 professional football players (age, 24.2 ± 4.4 years.; height, 177.7 ± 5.9 cm; weight, 72.9 ± 8.65 kg; playing experience, 4.53 ± 3.65 years.) participated in this cohort study. Forty-one hamstring injuries (23 Right and 18 Left) were recorded. Among the 41 hamstring injuries, 56% (n = 23) were on the dominant side, and 12% (n = 5) recurred within the study period. The average time lost
Discussion
The aim of this study was to investigate potential intrinsic risk factors for hamstring strain injuries among professional football players. The key finding of this cohort study was that a previous history of an acute hamstring injury, lower eccentric hamstring strength, and lower concentric hamstring to quadriceps strength ratio are significant risk factors of HSI. Previously injured players have a 3.6-fold higher risk of sustaining HSI. Players with a preseason eccentric hamstring peak torque
Conclusion
Professional football players with clinically significant lower isokinetic hamstring strength, lower H/Q ratio, and a previous injury of HSI were linked to increased risk of acute future HSI. Other potential risk factors, such as age, a bilateral difference of isokinetic hamstring strength measures, isokinetic quadriceps strength measures, height, and weight, proved to be irrelevant to the risk of HSI. A preseason screening of H/Q ratio (Con 60/Con 60), and eccentric hamstring strength (Ecc 30)
Practical implications
- •
Players with history of previous hamstring strain injuries have a 3.6-fold higher risk of sustaining hamstring strain injuries.
- •
Low speed hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratio and eccentric hamstring strength are modifiable risk factors of hamstring strain injuries among professional football players.
- •
It is recommended to test the isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength at slow speed, which is 30–60 deg s−1.
- •
Team medical staffs may monitor players’ eccentric hamstring strength and
Acknowledgements
There has been no external financial assistance with this project.
References (30)
- et al.
A prospective epidemiological study of injury incidence and injury patterns in a Hong Kong male professional football league during the competitive season
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol
(2014) - et al.
The reliability and validity of a video-based method for assessing hamstring strength in football players
J Exerc Sci Fit
(2017) - et al.
Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer)
Am J Sports Med
(2011) - et al.
Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men's professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study
Br J Sports Med
(2016) - et al.
Intrinsic risk factors for hamstring injuries among male soccer players: a prospective cohort study
Am J Sports Med
(2010) - et al.
Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging
Br J Sports Med
(2001) - et al.
The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of hamstring injuries
Br J Sports Med
(2004) - et al.
Risk factors for sports injuries — a methodological approach
Br J Sports Med
(2003) Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model
Clin J Sport Med
(1994)- et al.
Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload
Scand J Med Sci Sports
(2003)
High-speed running type or stretching-type of hamstring injuries makes a difference to treatment and prognosis
Br J Sports Med
Risk factors for injuries in football
Am J Sports Med
Eccentric knee flexor strength and risk of hamstring injuries in Rugby Union: a prospective study
Am J Sports Med
Intrinsic risk factors of non-contact quadriceps and hamstring strains in soccer: a prospective study of 100 professional players
Br J Sports Med
Risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury in sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Br J Sports Med
Cited by (112)
Effects of eccentric-emphasized leg curl intervention on muscle strength imbalance markers in professional soccer players during pre-season
2023, Journal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesIs hamstrings-to-quadriceps torque ratio useful for predicting anterior cruciate ligament and hamstring injuries? A systematic and critical review
2023, Journal of Sport and Health ScienceCitation Excerpt :Of the 5 included studies on ACL injury, all of them examined the conventional ratio,44,46–49 only 1 examined the functional ratio,49 and none of them assessed the mixed ratio (Table 1). All studies except for 2 used a slow angular velocity (60°/s), 7 studies3,31,32,37,38,41,43 used a 180°/s test, 7 studies3,13,33–36,41 used a 240°/s test, 4 studies used a 300°/s test,29–31,38 while only one3 used a 120°/s angular velocity test. Twelve of the included studies3,13,28–30,37–40,44,46,48 evaluated strength from a seated position (hip angle range 80°–105°), while the remaining 11 studies31–36,41–43,47,49 did not specify the participant testing position (Table 1).
Assessing the Single Leg Bridge Test performance among women’s soccer professional athletes
2024, Sport Sciences for Health