Original researchComparison of plantar loads during treadmill and overground running
Introduction
Treadmills are widely used in laboratory settings for training and research to control speed and slope easily.1 The increased use of treadmills in scientific investigations raises issues on differences in running patterns on a treadmill and on overground surfaces. Some studies have found that compared with running on overground surfaces, treadmill running exhibits a shorter flight phase, decreased stride length, and increased cadence at a moderate speed of 3.3–4.8 m/s.2 On the other hand, other studies have shown that the some kinematic variables (e.g., hip adduction angle, hip internal/external rotation, ankle eversion, maximal pelvic rotation) of treadmill gait are similar to those of overground gait.3, 4 To date, whether the treadmill-based analysis of running mechanics can simulate overground running mechanics remains a contentious issue.4, 5
Plantar loads are widely used to assess injury risks,6 and many studies have discussed plantar pressures when running and performing specific sports movements on different overground surfaces.7, 8, 9, 10, 11 However, little is known about the differences in plantar load distributions during treadmill and overground running. Impact forces on the lower extremity, which are associated with repetitive loading, are responsible for overuse injuries in the lower extremity.12, 13 A higher plantar pressure underneath the medial side of the foot has been found in runners with exercise-related lower-extremity pain,14 and has been assumed as one risk factor associated with sports injury.10
The identification of impact forces and plantar pressure distribution characteristics during treadmill and overground running can help reveal risk factors related to sports injury. Common overground surfaces for runners include concrete, asphalt, synthetic rubber sports track, and natural turf. Concrete and asphalt are the most commonly used surfaces for recreational and marathon runs.10 Natural grass surfaces have been used previously to study plantar loads during running and performing specific sports movements.8, 9, 10 Given the contention about running mechanics between different surfaces, this study compares plantar loads of running on a treadmill, concrete, and grass. We hypothesize that plantar loads during treadmill running are lower than those during overground running.
Section snippets
Methods
A total of sixteen male amateur runners (aged 22.9 ± 1.8 years; body mass of 63.9 ± 9.7 kg; body height of 170.0 ± 4.7 cm), who were all right leg dominant, heel strikers, and with a shoe size of 41 (European standards), were recruited from the university long distance running team to participate in the study. The participants were experienced treadmill or overground surface runners who run at least 20 km per week. Only male participants were recruited to eliminate gender differences in running
Results
The mean and standard deviations of MP, MF, CT, and RCT are presented in Table 1. The maximum plantar pressures were higher when running on concrete than on natural grass at the total foot (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 22.97–93.08 kPa), and at the central (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 18.84–57.55 kPa), and lateral forefoot (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 22.14–83.28 kPa). Treadmill running induced a lower maximum pressure at the total foot compared with running on concrete (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 29.11–116.42 kPa). Compared with overground
Discussion
One of the primary findings of the current study was that comparable plantar force existed between running on concrete and running on grass surfaces. Comparable plantar loads between surfaces maybe explained by previous studies indicating harder surfaces induce kinematic changes in the sagittal plane of the lower limb such as ankle, knee and hip flexion.16, 19 Changes in lower extremity kinematics and stiffness adaptations are interpreted as a form of active adaptation to maintain similar
Conclusion
In the current study, similar plantar forces during running on concrete and grass surfaces were found. In comparison treadmill running reduced plantar forces at the total foot, medial forefoot, great toe and lesser toes. Consistently, treadmill running also demonstrated a lower magnitude of maximum plantar pressure at the great and lesser toes in comparison to overground running. These results suggest that the plantar load distribution in treadmill running is reduced in comparison to overground
Practical implications
- •
Plantar load in treadmill running is lower than that in running on overground surfaces.
- •
Caution should be taken whenever a treadmill is used to mimic overground running in assessing plantar loads in sports shoe studies.
- •
Treadmill running at a natural speed may a better rehabilitation strategy for someone who has lower extremity injuries and is under rehabilitation stage due to low plantar load.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Mr. Justin Wai-Yuk Lee, Mr. Kam-Ming Mok and Miss Mandy Man-Ling Chung for their assistance in data collection.
We declared that there is no external financial support in the study.
References (29)
- et al.
Familiarization to treadmill running in young unimpaired adults
Human Movement Science
(2005) - et al.
A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo–pelvic–hip complex
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2001) - et al.
Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
(2006) - et al.
In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
(2010) - et al.
Ground reaction forces in distance running
Journal of Biomechanics
(1980) - et al.
Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2003) - et al.
The influence of walking speed and footwear on plantar pressures in older adults
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2004) The biomechanics of running on different surfaces
Clinics in Pediatric Medicine and Surgery
(1986)- et al.
Intra-stride belt-speed variation affects treadmill locomotion
Gait and Posture
(1998) - et al.
Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gait: a 3-D finite element analysis
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2001)