Original research
Comparison of plantar loads during treadmill and overground running

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study is to compare plantar loads during treadmill running and running on concrete and grass surfaces.

Design

Crossover study design was used in the study.

Methods

A total of 16 experienced heel-to-toe runners participated in the study. Plantar loads data were collected using a Novel Pedar insole sensor system during running on the treadmill, concrete, and grass surfaces at 3.8 m/s running speed and then analyzed.

Results

Compared with running on the two other surfaces, treadmill running showed a lower magnitude of maximum plantar pressure and maximum plantar force for the total foot, maximum plantar pressure at two toe regions, and maximum plantar force for the medial forefoot region and two toe regions (p < 0.0017). Treadmill running also showed a longer absolute contact time at two toe regions compared with running on the other two surfaces (p < 0.0017).

Conclusions

Treadmill running is associated with a lower magnitude of maximum plantar pressure and a lower maximum plantar force at the plantar areas. These results suggest that the plantar load distribution in treadmill running is not the same as the plantar load distribution in running on overground surfaces. Treadmill running may be useful in early rehabilitation programs. Patients with injuries in their lower extremities may benefit from the reduction in plantar loads. However, the translation to overground running needs investigation.

Introduction

Treadmills are widely used in laboratory settings for training and research to control speed and slope easily.1 The increased use of treadmills in scientific investigations raises issues on differences in running patterns on a treadmill and on overground surfaces. Some studies have found that compared with running on overground surfaces, treadmill running exhibits a shorter flight phase, decreased stride length, and increased cadence at a moderate speed of 3.3–4.8 m/s.2 On the other hand, other studies have shown that the some kinematic variables (e.g., hip adduction angle, hip internal/external rotation, ankle eversion, maximal pelvic rotation) of treadmill gait are similar to those of overground gait.3, 4 To date, whether the treadmill-based analysis of running mechanics can simulate overground running mechanics remains a contentious issue.4, 5

Plantar loads are widely used to assess injury risks,6 and many studies have discussed plantar pressures when running and performing specific sports movements on different overground surfaces.7, 8, 9, 10, 11 However, little is known about the differences in plantar load distributions during treadmill and overground running. Impact forces on the lower extremity, which are associated with repetitive loading, are responsible for overuse injuries in the lower extremity.12, 13 A higher plantar pressure underneath the medial side of the foot has been found in runners with exercise-related lower-extremity pain,14 and has been assumed as one risk factor associated with sports injury.10

The identification of impact forces and plantar pressure distribution characteristics during treadmill and overground running can help reveal risk factors related to sports injury. Common overground surfaces for runners include concrete, asphalt, synthetic rubber sports track, and natural turf. Concrete and asphalt are the most commonly used surfaces for recreational and marathon runs.10 Natural grass surfaces have been used previously to study plantar loads during running and performing specific sports movements.8, 9, 10 Given the contention about running mechanics between different surfaces, this study compares plantar loads of running on a treadmill, concrete, and grass. We hypothesize that plantar loads during treadmill running are lower than those during overground running.

Section snippets

Methods

A total of sixteen male amateur runners (aged 22.9 ± 1.8 years; body mass of 63.9 ± 9.7 kg; body height of 170.0 ± 4.7 cm), who were all right leg dominant, heel strikers, and with a shoe size of 41 (European standards), were recruited from the university long distance running team to participate in the study. The participants were experienced treadmill or overground surface runners who run at least 20 km per week. Only male participants were recruited to eliminate gender differences in running

Results

The mean and standard deviations of MP, MF, CT, and RCT are presented in Table 1. The maximum plantar pressures were higher when running on concrete than on natural grass at the total foot (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 22.97–93.08 kPa), and at the central (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 18.84–57.55 kPa), and lateral forefoot (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 22.14–83.28 kPa). Treadmill running induced a lower maximum pressure at the total foot compared with running on concrete (p < 0.0017, 95% CI = 29.11–116.42 kPa). Compared with overground

Discussion

One of the primary findings of the current study was that comparable plantar force existed between running on concrete and running on grass surfaces. Comparable plantar loads between surfaces maybe explained by previous studies indicating harder surfaces induce kinematic changes in the sagittal plane of the lower limb such as ankle, knee and hip flexion.16, 19 Changes in lower extremity kinematics and stiffness adaptations are interpreted as a form of active adaptation to maintain similar

Conclusion

In the current study, similar plantar forces during running on concrete and grass surfaces were found. In comparison treadmill running reduced plantar forces at the total foot, medial forefoot, great toe and lesser toes. Consistently, treadmill running also demonstrated a lower magnitude of maximum plantar pressure at the great and lesser toes in comparison to overground running. These results suggest that the plantar load distribution in treadmill running is reduced in comparison to overground

Practical implications

  • Plantar load in treadmill running is lower than that in running on overground surfaces.

  • Caution should be taken whenever a treadmill is used to mimic overground running in assessing plantar loads in sports shoe studies.

  • Treadmill running at a natural speed may a better rehabilitation strategy for someone who has lower extremity injuries and is under rehabilitation stage due to low plantar load.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Justin Wai-Yuk Lee, Mr. Kam-Ming Mok and Miss Mandy Man-Ling Chung for their assistance in data collection.

We declared that there is no external financial support in the study.

References (29)

  • V. Wank et al.

    Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running

    International Journal of Sports Medicine

    (1998)
  • P.O. Riley et al.

    A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    (2008)
  • R. Kram et al.

    Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (1998)
  • R.M. Queen et al.

    Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks

    American Journal of Sports Medicine

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +86 28 85067040.

    2

    Tel.: +852 26096089; fax: +852 26035781.

    View full text