Original paper
Changes in motor skill and fitness measures among children with high and low motor competence: A five-year longitudinal study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.012Get rights and content

Summary

Children with low motor competence (LMC) are less able to participate fully in many sports and recreational activities typically enjoyed by their well-coordinated peers. Poor fitness outcomes have been reported for these children, although previous studies have not tracked these outcomes over time. In this study, 19 children (8 girls and 11 boys) with LMC aged between 5 and 7 years were matched by age and gender with 19 children with high motor competence (HMC). Six fitness (body composition and cardiovascular endurance) and motor skill (sprint run, standing broad jump and balance) measures were repeated for each group once a year for five years. For each year of the study, the LMC groups performed less well on all measures than the HMC groups. Changes over time were significantly different between groups for cardiovascular endurance, 50-m run and balance, but not for body composition, overhand throw or standing broad jump. Between the two groups, performances were significantly different for all measures, except body composition. These findings confirm the impact of LMC on fitness measures and skill performances over time.

Introduction

Children with motor difficulties are unable to participate successfully in many physical activities enjoyed by their well-coordinated peers. In addition, they have difficulty with everyday tasks important in home, school and social life.1 As a consequence there may be a reduction in their perceived motor competence,2 confidence and motivation to participate in physical activity,3 and, as a result, they withdraw from physical activity opportunities. Bouffard et al.4 describe this phenomenon as an ‘activity deficit’.

One of the many consequences of reduced activity is that fitness components, such as muscle strength and endurance, flexibility, cardiovascular endurance and anaerobic performance are compromised. While motor-coordination may confound some fitness measures, cross-sectional studies have shown that young children with low motor competence (LMC) are consistently outperformed by their well-coordinated peers.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 In a study of 85 children with LMC, performances on push-ups, a test of muscle strength and endurance, ranged between 0 and the 65th percentile rank.10 Hammond6 used the flexed arm-hang to measure upper limb strength in 17 children with LMC. Their performances ranged between the 5th and 62nd percentile rank. Extreme ranges of flexibility and inflexibility can be observed in this population.6, 10 Hyperflexibility reduces stability around the joint and may make controlled movement difficult, and hypoflexibility limits the range of movement of joints and therefore restricts movement. Reduced cardiovascular endurance was reported for children with LMC compared to well-coordinated children when completing a distance run over 8005, 6 and 1600 m.12 O’Beirne et al.11 compared 50-m run times (anaerobic performance) for 24 boys aged between 7 and 9 years with LMC to 24 coordinated controls. The boys with LMC were significantly slower than their peers. The recorded heart rates of children with LMC undertaking a multistage shuttle run reached a maximal level much earlier than a control group and consequently, these children were unable to sustain the task as long.13 The relationship between body composition and motor competence is less conclusive. Some studies have reported higher levels of overweight and obesity among children with LMC,6, 11, 14, 15 whereas others have only found significant difference among boys.16 Low fitness outcomes combined with inefficient motor patterns can contribute to early fatigue11, 13 and thereby, limit opportunities to develop motor skills through playground play, after-school sport and backyard activities.

What is not evident from studies investigating fitness and motor skills performances in children with LMC is whether the reported deficits, when compared to typically developing children, increase or decrease with time and maturity. Few studies have tracked motor skill and fitness variables over time in this population. If the activity deficit hypothesis is correct,4 children with poor motor competence would increasingly withdraw from physical activity opportunities, and the potential for relatively poorer outcome in fitness levels would increase. Where fitness measures were tracked over time in typically developing children, changes in physical activity level were only related to flexibility among girls and cardiovascular endurance among boys.17 However, where children with LMC have been tracked into adolescence, quite a few continue to experience motor problems, as well as educational, social and emotional difficulties.18, 19, 20

The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a subsample of children participating in a longitudinal study tracking fitness and skill levels of children attending a school in metropolitan Perth, Australia. A group of children with LMC were identified in the first year of the study through a motor screen undertaken by all children aged 5 to 7 years. Their fitness and motor skill results for five consecutive years are reported in comparison to a group of same-aged peers who were identified as having high motor competence (HMC).

Section snippets

Method

In 2000, a whole-school fitness and skills testing program was undertaken at a local primary school in the Perth metropolitan area by second-year university students as part of a course requirement and overseen by the author. Prior to the testing day, the students received intensive training in test protocol to ensure inter-rater reliability. As part of the initial phase, students aged between 5 and 7 years completed a four-item gross motor screening test, stay in step (SIS).21 Subsequently, the

Participants

From the pool of 564 students who participated in the year 2000, 85 girls (aged 5 years, n = 33; 6 years, n = 26, and 7 years, n = 26) and 101 boys (aged 5 years, n = 39; 6 years, n = 28, and 7 years, n = 34) completed the gross motor screening test for this age group.21 From this group of participants, 19 students or 18.8% were identified as having LMC. This group comprised eight girls (M = 5.75 years) and 11 boys (M = 5.91 years). The prevalence of LMC, sometimes referred to as developmental coordination disorder

Motor competence screening test

Stay in step (SIS) is a gross motor screening test for children ranging in age from 5 to 7 years that has established test–retest reliability for each item ranging between R = .87 to R = .90 and has been validated for identifying children with poor coordination.21, 22 The four motor skills that make up the SIS are: balance on one foot; volleyball bounce and catch; single hop for distance; and the 50-m run.

Results

The mean, standard deviations and range of scores for each group over time are shown in Table 1. As would be expected, the analyses of variance revealed that changes in outcomes over time within both groups were significant for all measures. Changes over time were significantly different between groups for cardiovascular endurance, 50-m run and static balance, but not for body composition, overhand throw or standing broad jump. Between the two groups, performances were significantly different

Discussion

Overall, the results supported findings from other studies. As shown in Table 1, the results of the group with LMC were poorer for most fitness items; with a lower performance on the broad jump, slower speed on the 50-m run, reduced balance times, shorter distance throws and lower cardiorespiratory endurance as measured by the MSFT each year. There was no difference between the groups for BMI. These findings confirm the impact of LMC on fitness measures and skill performances over time. While

Practical implications

  • Some skill tests such as the distance throw and standing broad jump and some fitness tests such as the 50-m run are suitable for children with LMC as they do not seem to plateau, but continue to improve between the ages of 5 and 12 years. On the other hand, the MSFT may not be suitable with these children.

  • It was encouraging to find that motor skills and fitness improve, even without specific interventions, in young children with LMC. This suggests that most aspects of fitness can be maintained

Future implications

More longitudinal studies such as this one are needed to better understand changes in motor competence over time. The data gathered for this study were narrowly focused on motor skill and fitness. Ideally, further studies will comprise more participants and also include other factors that are thought to impact on these outcomes such as physical activity levels, self-efficacy and perceived motor competence.

These findings highlight the importance of identifying and supporting children with LMC

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the support of the staff and students of Ashburton Primary School and Paul Heard for the preliminary data analyses. There has been no external financial support for this project.

References (37)

  • J. Visser et al.

    The relationship between physical growth, the level of activity and the development of motor skills in adolescence: differences between children with DCD and controls

    Hum Mov Sci

    (1998)
  • S.A. Cermak et al.

    What is developmental coordination disorder?

  • B. Rose et al.

    Coordination and gender influences on the perceived competence of children

    APAQ

    (1997)
  • B. Rose et al.

    The importance of motor coordination for children's motivational orientation in sport

    APAQ

    (1998)
  • M. Bouffard et al.

    A test of the activity deficit hypothesis with children with movement difficulties

    APAQ

    (1996)
  • A. Deschenes

    The physical fitness and gross motor performance of children with developmental coordination disorder [Masters]

    (1994)
  • Hammond J. Investigation into the characteristics of children with motor difficulties: An holistic approach...
  • B. Hands

    Fitness and motor skill levels of Western Australian primary school children

    (2000)
  • B. Hands et al.

    Fitness levels in children with low motor competence

  • D. Larkin et al.

    Structure/function interactions: a concern in the movement impaired child

  • C. O’Beirne et al.

    Fitness characteristics of clumsy children

  • C. O’Beirne et al.

    Coordination problems and anaerobic performance in children

    APAQ

    (1994)
  • D. Larkin et al.

    Out of step: coordinating kids movement

    (1991)
  • B. Hands et al.

    Physical fitness and developmental coordination disorder

  • U. Wasmund-Bodenstedt

    High and low achievers in primary school physical education

    Int J Phys Educ

    (1988)
  • J. Cairney et al.

    Developmental coordination disorder and overwegiht and obesity in children aged 9–14 years

    Int J Obes

    (2005)
  • G. Baquet et al.

    Longitudinal follow-up of fitness during childhood: interaction with physical activity

    Am J Hum Biol

    (2006)
  • A. Losse et al.

    Clumsiness in children - Do they grow out of it? A 10-year follow-up study

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (178)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text