Pediatric urolithiasis in a non-endemic country: A single center experience from The Netherlands
Introduction
Pediatric urolithiasis is a serious disease for the children, parents, and doctors involved because it can cause permanent kidney damage and it has a high recurrence rate. The lifetime chance of an individual having a kidney- or bladder-stone is approximately 10–15% with a nearly 60% chance of recurrence within 10 years if not treated [1]. Although usually diagnosed between the third and fourth decade of life, urolithiasis can present at all ages, including childhood.
Several studies have shown an increase in incidence and prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis over the past decades. In 2007 Vandervoort et al. described a 4.6-fold increase in admittance in New York of children with urolithiasis, comparing data from 1994 to 1996 with 2003–2005 [2]. A recent study in the United States by Routh et al. [3] described a threefold increase in pediatric urolithiasis from 18.4 per 100,000 in 1999 to 57.0 per 100,000 in 2008. Annual incidences have been reported varying from 1.8 per 100,000 children per year in Kuwait 1996–2000 [4], 6.3 per 100,000 children under 16 years of age in an Icelandic study in 1995–2000 [5], up to a prevalence of 17% in patients under 14 years of age in endemic areas like Turkey, Tunisia, and the Far East [6].
Metabolic disorders, anatomical abnormalities, urinary tract infections (UTIs), intoxications (China), and dietary and climatic factors all contribute to the risk of developing kidney stones. Koyuncu et al. [7] found that, despite conservative measures, the risk of recurrence increases threefold if at least one metabolic abnormality is present. During metabolic evaluation in children with urolithiasis, 76% of patients showed at least one abnormality in the 24-hour urine collection as an explanation for the urolithiasis [2].
This illustrates the importance of proper management protocols to optimize treatment, reduce the recurrence risk and improve outcome. Because of the large geographic variation in incidence and etiologic factors, region-specific data are needed to develop adequate management protocols. Although much research has been done on etiologic factors, there is a paucity of published data from West European countries. This study was designed to provide insight in etiologic factors of pediatric urolithiasis in The Netherlands, and compare these data with other regions.
Section snippets
Clinical evaluation studies
This study was performed at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, a referral center for pediatric urolithiasis for the eastern parts of The Netherlands. We included all patients aged 0–19 years with a stone analysis between 1996 and 2010 according to the laboratory database. The year 1996 was selected for the start of inclusion, as the current stone analysis spectrophotometer has been in use since then. In addition, we included all children who were diagnosed with urolithiasis in this
Clinical features
In this study, 71 children were included (48 males, male: female ratio 2.1:1) with a mean age of 8.8 years (range 0.5–18.3 years, SD 5.6). A positive family history for urolithiasis in first- or second-degree family members was reported in 28.2% of the patients. Of nine patients, one or both parents were from outside The Netherlands. Three originated from Turkey, and one each from Germany, Rumania, Somalia, Finland, Greece, and Aruba.
Thirty percent of the patients (n = 21) had a history of
Discussion
In our European single-center study in The Netherlands, data on 71 children with urolithiasis were available to provide insight into the (metabolic) causes of pediatric urolithiasis in our region.
According to the stone composition, The Netherlands seems to be comparable to the UK (Table 3). In the United States, childhood stone composition has been described to consist mainly of calcium oxalate and/or calcium phosphate (45–65% and 14–30%). uric acid, struvite, and cystine stones account for
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marc Hofs for the data on stone analysis. MFS is supported by the Dutch Kidney Foundation, which had no involvement in study design, in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data.
References (23)
- et al.
Summary of the National Institutes of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases conference on urolithiasis: state of the art and future research needs
J Urol
(1995) - et al.
Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome
J Urol
(2007) - et al.
Urinary phosphate/creatinine, calcium/creatinine, and magnesium/creatinine ratios in a healthy pediatric population
J Pediatr
(1997) - et al.
Pediatric urolithiasis: developing nation perspectives
J Urol
(2002) - et al.
Pediatric urolithiasis in Tunisia: a multi-centric study of 525 patients
J Pediatr Urol
(2006) Childhood stones
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am
(2002)- et al.
Urolithiasis in pediatric patients
Mayo Clin Proc
(1993) - et al.
A study of the etiology of idiopathic calcium urolithiasis in children: hypocitruria is the most important risk factor
J Urol
(2000) - et al.
Metabolic stone composition in Egyptian children
J Pediatr Urol
(2009) - et al.
Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals
J Urol
(2010)
Pediatric urolithiasis in Kuwait
Int Urol Nephrol
Cited by (25)
Composition of urinary calculi: Lessons from a French epidemiologic retrospective study
2020, Progres en UrologieCitation Excerpt :Thus, carbapatite was reported to be the most frequent component in this paediatric population [14]. While our results confirmed the predominance of carbapatite in this population, the percentage of samples composed of struvite as a majority was much lower in our study (< 5%) than in a Dutch paediatric population (25%) [24]. In the latter study, struvite was considered for the statistical analysis even if it was not the main component.
Pediatric urolithiasis in Morocco: Composition of 432 urinary calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy
2019, Progres en UrologieCitation Excerpt :In this study (Table 2) and also in those carried out in Tunisia [12] and Algeria [11], COD was significantly less frequent as compared to the results reported in France [19]. Such data suggest that hypercalciuria could be a less frequent cause of stones in the Maghreb countries compared to industrialized ones where hypercalciuria is found in more than 45% of cases in children stone formers [26,27]. The frequency of COM stones in Moroccan children was found very high (51.5%).
Clinical profile, diagnosis and treatment of pediatric urolithiasis: a single center experience iKazakhstan
2023, Bangladesh Journal of Medical SciencePREDICTIVE ABILITY OF IMMUNOGENETIC STUDIES FOR INCIDENCE OF UROLITHIASIS IN CHILDREN
2023, Avicenna BulletinUrinary Stone Disease and Nephrocalcinosis
2022, Pediatric Nephrology: Eighth Edition