Hypospadias dilemmas: A round table

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.009Get rights and content

Introduction

At each step in the assessment and management of hypospadias arise questions and dilemmas that the four authors of this round table would like to list and explain from their point of view. From evaluation of hypospadias severity, preoperative biological assessment, preoperative hormonal stimulation, choice of urethroplasty to the postoperative evaluation, many divergences exist. Yet there is need to find a consensual approach to this congenital anomaly in pediatric urological practice. Warren Snodgrass, Antonio Macedo and Pierre Mouriquand developed this dialogue following their panel discussion at the World Congress of Pediatric Urology. Piet Hoebeke was asked to referee their comments to highlight areas of agreement and dispute.

Section snippets

Anatomy and classification

Question 1: What criteria do you find relevant to evaluate the severity of hypospadias?

PM: Severity follows the anatomy of hypospadias, which could be defined as a development halt that leads to an insufficient development of the genital tubercle essentially marked by a ventral triangular defect [1]. Its summit is formed by the proximal division of the corpus spongiosum, the lateral sides by the two atretic pillars of spongiosum, and the base by the widely open glans. The more proximally the

Etiology

Question 4: If, when and how do you request a preoperative biological screening of your hypospadiac patient?

PM: No one knows the answer. Many would evaluate the biology when the hypospadias is considered as severe or associated with other anomalies. As our department belongs to the national reference centre for DSD (disorders of sex development), we decided to evaluate all patients with hypospadias in order to identify whether underlying biological impairments are more common in one category or

Preoperative hormonal stimulation

Question 7: If, when and how would you stimulate the hypospadiac penis prior to surgery?

PM: I would consider androgen stimulation when the genital tubercle is under 25 mm long during the first year of life or if the glans is small (diameter <15 mm) [6,7]. I would definitely leave a 6-month gap between androgen stimulation and surgery to avoid the potential detrimental effects of androgens on the healing process. Our group is currently evaluating preoperative topical estrogen stimulation in

Surgical repair

Question 8: If, when and how do you assess the penile curvature?

PM: I have to confess that in most hypospadias cases with anterior division of the corpus spongiosum I do not perform an erection test, as I know, by experience, that most cases of ventral curvature are corrected by dissecting the ventral aspect of the penis. I still perform the erection test in the most severe hypospadias with a proximal or perineal division of the spongiosum.

AM: I perform an erection test after completely

Postoperative evaluation

Question 16: When do you see the patients again after reconstruction?

PM: 2 months; 12 months; at puberty when possible and in case of dysuria or urinary tract infection.

AM: My protocol to see the patients is: next week, 1 month, 6 months, and thereafter is optional for the next year or if there are any questions.

WS: Duration and means of follow up needed to detect the majority of complications remain ill defined, in large part because the time complications were first encountered is rarely

Conclusion

Question 18: How many cases do you perform each year?

PM: Our unit sees a mean number of 160 patients each year and I would do approximately 120.

AM: Approximately 80 cases a year, but interestingly 50% primary proximal and secondary repairs (mostly referred) and 50% distal cases.

WS: In 2009, I performed 72 primary distal repairs, 20 primary proximal repairs, and 32 reoperations, including 12 two-stage buccal graft procedures, in Dallas.

PH: From the answers it reads that you should do around 100

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (0)

Cited by (142)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text