Original articleIllusory touch and tactile perception in somatoform dissociators
Introduction
The World Health Organization defines dissociation as “a partial or complete loss of the normal integration between memories of the past, awareness of identity and immediate sensations, and control of bodily movements” [1]. Although most dissociation research focuses on disturbances in memory and identity, several recent theorists [2], [3], [4] have emphasized the role of dissociation in symptoms that suggest neurological disease, but which cannot be explained by organic pathology. Such “pseudoneurological” symptoms (e.g., paralysis, seizures, sensory loss) are part of a wider group of complaints characterized by medically unexplained physical symptoms, which are common in healthcare settings and often associated with high levels of distress, disability, and resource utilization [5], [6], [7].
Current taxonomies disagree in their classification of pseudoneurological illness. DSM-IV places pseudoneurological symptoms with other medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) in the somatoform disorders category, separate from the dissociative disorders [8]. Consistent with this, patients with pseudoneurological symptoms often report many other unexplained symptoms, and the presence of one or more pseudoneurological complaints is required for a DSM-IV diagnosis of somatization disorder [8]. Patients with multiple pseudoneurological symptoms tend to experience more distress, psychopathology and resource utilization than other somatoform patients [9], [10], [11], even after controlling for the total number of unexplained symptoms [11]. ICD-10, in contrast, categorizes pseudoneurological symptoms as dissociative (conversion) disorders alongside amnesia, fugue, and multiple personality, but separate from other unexplained symptoms [1]. One influential model spans both taxonomies by describing pseudoneurological symptoms as examples of “somatoform dissociation,” linking them with “psychoform” dissociative phenomena such as amnesia and identity disturbance [3], [12]. Consistent with this, pseudoneurological symptoms and other unexplained complaints are commonly reported by patients with psychoform dissociative disorders [12], [13], [14]. The latter also tend to score highly on the somatoform dissociation questionnaire (SDQ-20[15], [16]), which encompasses a range of pseudoneurological phenomena.
Discrepancies in the classification of these phenomena are likely to remain until the psychological basis of these conditions is better understood [17]. Janet's original dissociation model [18] contends that dissociative phenomena reflect the activation of “systems of ideas and functions” that have been separated from awareness by a deficit in attention and integrative capacity due to trauma. Most recent models of pseudoneurological illness [2], [3], [4] have been influenced by this account, although the emphasis placed on particular concepts, such as the role of trauma, varies from one model to another. One such model [2] suggests that pseudoneurological symptoms are disturbances in consciousness and cognitive control, reflecting the over-activation of mental representations of illness in memory. In this account, repeatedly recollecting or otherwise attending to these “rogue representations” increases their activation to the point where they dictate bodily awareness and/or control, in a manner akin to Janet's “systems.”
Although there is a considerable body of theory concerning the psychological basis of pseudoneurological symptoms, there are relatively few empirical studies in this area. With that in mind, this article describes an experimental study designed to test hypotheses concerning the role of tactile perception and memory in somatoform dissociation [2]. We adopted a recent paradigm, the somatic signal detection task (SSDT; [19]), designed to mimic the experience of somatoform phenomena. During the SSDT, participants indicate whether they feel vibrations delivered to their fingertip at perceptual threshold over a series of trials where the presence of the vibration is varied. A light is located next to the vibrating device and is illuminated on half of the trials, creating four trial types: vibration alone, vibration plus light, light alone, no stimulation. Using signal detection analysis, the paradigm can be used to calculate an individual's general perceptual ability (ie, tactile sensitivity or d′) and their overall tendency to respond positively regardless of what stimulus is presented (i.e., their response criterion or c). Previous research indicates that healthy participants report the presence of a vibration on a significant minority of trials where no tactile stimulus has been presented (“false alarms”), particularly when the light is present [19]. It has been argued that these illusory touch experiences are akin to the kinds of misperceptions reported by patients with somatoform symptoms and that similar processes are likely to be operating in each case [19]. If so, the paradigm has potential as a laboratory analogue of somatoform phenomena, facilitating research into the mechanisms of these conditions.
As an initial step towards establishing the validity of this idea, the primary aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between somatoform dissociation and illusory touch experiences on the SSDT. As the tendency to experience unexplained symptoms is a trait-like phenomenon distributed across both normal and clinical populations [20], we sampled nonclinical participants with and without a history of pseudoneurological symptoms, as indicated by relatively high and low scores on the SDQ-20, and compared them on the SSDT. We predicted that the high SDQ-20 group would have a significantly lower response criterion (c) than the low SDQ-20 group, due to more false alarms (i.e., illusory touch experiences) for the former. No predictions were made regarding the hit rates or tactile sensitivity of the two groups. We also manipulated the presence of the light, with a view to maximizing the occurrence of false alarms and testing whether the SDQ-20 groups are differentially influenced by the addition of this stimulus.
A secondary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the frequency of illusory touch on the SSDT varies according to the activation of tactile representations in memory [2], [19]. Prior to the SSDT, all participants were presented with a training phase comprising a series of picture stimuli, half of which were accompanied by a vibration. They then completed a recall phase where they were presented with a subset of the training pictures and asked to identify those that had previously been presented with a vibration during the training. At recall, we varied the proportion of picture stimuli that had been paired with a vibration during training, so that one group (maximal recall) was presented with three times as many such pictures as the other group (minimal recall). In this way, we attempted to manipulate the frequency with which participants recalled vibrations, and thereby the activation of vibration-related memories. We predicted that participants in the maximal recall group would experience more illusory touch (i.e., false alarms) on the SSDT than those in the minimal recall group, following Refs. [2], [19]. We predicted that this effect would be more pronounced for the high SDQ group.
Section snippets
Design
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the local committee. A 2×2×2 mixed design was used. SDQ-20 group (low vs. high) and condition (minimal recall vs. maximal recall) were between subjects factors; light (present vs. absent) was a within subjects factor. Participants' “yes” or “no” responses concerning the presence of a vibration on each trial were recorded and classified as hits (vibration-present trials with a correct “yes”’ response), false alarms (vibration-absent trials with an
Comparability of groups
Table 2 presents descriptive statistics for the questionnaires. Between-subjects MANOVA revealed a significant main effect of SDQ-20 group [F4,73=24.84, P<.001, partial η2=.576]. There was no main effect of recall condition and no SDQ-20 group×recall condition interaction. Univariate F tests revealed that participants in the high SDQ-20 group scored higher on all of the questionnaire measures than participants in the low SDQ-20 group: SDQ-20, F(1,76)=57.99, P<.001, partial η2=433; STAI-T, F
Discussion
As predicted, the high SDQ group exhibited more false alarms on the SSDT and a more liberal response criterion than the low SDQ group when controlling for depression, trait anxiety, and somatosensory amplification. We regard this as evidence for an association between illusory touch and the tendency to experience pseudoneurological symptoms (i.e., somatoform dissociation) in nonclinical participants. Although the group significant difference in false alarm rate was reduced to a trend when
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by a grant from The Leverhulme Trust [F/00 120/BF]. The authors are grateful to Kirsten McKenzie for her comments on this manuscript.
References (44)
- et al.
Should conversion disorder be reclassified as a dissociative disorder in DSM-V?
Psychosomatics
(2007) - et al.
A hierarchical classes analysis (HICLAS) of primary care patients with medically unexplained somatic symptoms
Psychiatry Res
(1998) Introduction to the special issue on medically unexplained symptoms: background information and future directions
Clin Psychol Rev
(2007)- et al.
Development of a paradigm for measuring somatic disturbance in clinical populations with medically unexplained symptoms
J Psychosom Res
(2008) - et al.
The Somatosensory Amplification Scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis
J Psychiatr Res
(1990) - et al.
Somatoform dissociation and somatosensory amplification are differentially associated with attention to the tactile modality following exposure to body-related stimuli
J Psychosom Res
(2007) - et al.
The psychological treatment of patients with functional somatic symptoms: A practical guide
J Psychosom Res
(1992) - et al.
The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: a theoretical and empirical review
Clin Psychol Rev
(2007) - et al.
Psychobiological perspectives on somatoform disorders
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2005) - et al.
Accurate awareness of heartbeat in hypochondriacal and non-hypochondriacal patients
J Psychosom Res
(1995)
Feeling your body or feeling badly: evidence for the limited validity of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale as an index of somatic sensitivity
J Psychosom Res
Proprioception in somatoform disorders
Behav Res Ther
Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans
Curr Biol
The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines
Psychological mechanisms of medically unexplained symptoms: an integrative conceptual model
Psychol Bull
Somatoform dissociation: Phenomena, measurement, & theoretical issues
Hypnosis and conversion hysteria: a unifying model
Cogn Neuropsychiatry
Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity
Arch Gen Psychiatry
Health-related quality of life and health care costs in severe, refractory irritable bowel syndrome
Ann Intern Med
Physical symptoms in primary care. Predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment
Arch Fam Med
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
The value of pseudoneurological symptoms for assessing psychopathology in primary care
Psychosom Med
Cited by (43)
Vague sensations. About the background and consequences of discordance between actual and perceived physiological changes
2024, Clinical Psychology ReviewMultisensory mechanisms of body perception in somatoform disorders
2019, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :It was established that the rubber hand illusion induction takes significantly more time in this group than in control group. To summarize, in recent years various research works have shown that the processes of multisensory body-stimuli integration (namely visual-tactile integration [26] or its dynamics [31]) may be disrupted in SD patients, while processes of visual-kinesthetic stimuli integration may remain intact [32]. We note that most of the studies mentioned were conducted on non-clinical populations, which imposes certain limitations on their results.
Contingent biofeedback outperforms other methods to enhance the accuracy of cardiac interoception: A comparison of short interventions
2019, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryAttending away from the body predicts increased physical symptom reports at six months in primary care patients
2018, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchThe neuropsychophysiology of tingling
2018, Consciousness and CognitionPre-stimulus alpha oscillations over somatosensory cortex predict tactile misperceptions
2017, NeuropsychologiaCitation Excerpt :In addition, an LED placed close to the non-dominant hand flashes during the SSDT, sometimes simultaneous with the tactile stimulus and sometimes on its own. The presence of the LED has previously been shown to increase false alarm rates (Brown et al., 2010; Lloyd et al., 2008, 2011). A common impediment to examining the relationship between alpha power and false alarms is the relative lack of false alarm trials to examine.