Predictors of outcome in fatigued employees on sick leave: Results from a randomised trial
Introduction
Fatigue is a common complaint in the general, primary care and working population, with a reported prevalence varying from 7% to 45% [1], [2], [3]. In most cases, fatigue lacks a clear somatic cause [4] and appears to be a functional symptom [5], [6]. Fatigue can best be understood as a continuum, ranging from mild complaints frequently seen in the community to severe, disabling fatigue like chronic fatigue (syndrome; [1]). When fatigue becomes severe and persistent, it may lead to long-term sick leave [7] and work disability [8].
In the present study, we report predictors of outcome in a sample of persistently fatigued employees absent from work on sick leave. To our knowledge, predictors of outcome have never been studied in this particular group of patients. The study sample was originally selected to assess the efficacy of brief cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) by general practitioners in fatigued employees on sick leave. Despite favourable effects of CBT for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in previous studies [9], [10], CBT had no detectable effect on the course and duration of fatigue and absenteeism compared with usual GP care [11]. One explanation for this finding might be that impairment in our sample was too advanced for a short treatment in a primary care setting. At baseline, 44% of the patients already met research criteria for CFS [12].
Previously, we studied the relation between persistent fatigue among employees and CFS and found that the two conditions share many characteristics [13]. Interesting in this context is the potential role of causal attributions. Studies have shown that outcomes in CFS patients are predicted by the extent to which patients attribute their illness to a somatic or psychological cause [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. In a recent study, Chalder et al. [21] found that fatigue caseness and social disability after CBT or counselling were predicted by stronger somatic causal attributions in a sample of fatigued primary care patients, 28% of whom met research criteria for CFS [12].
We examined the role of several factors, among which causal attributions, as predictors of outcome after 1 year. Outcome was defined in terms of (recovery from) fatigue caseness, work resumption and CFS-like caseness (meeting research criteria for CFS) at follow-up. As fatigued employees who meet criteria for CFS may differ from fatigued employees who do not meet CFS criteria in important clinical ways [13], we hypothesized that different predictors of outcome would be found in CFS-like cases and non-CFS cases at baseline.
Section snippets
Design
We conducted a prospective study as part of a randomised controlled trial. Data were collected on four occasions: at baseline and posttreatment assessments (4 months), using computerized questionnaires, and twice at follow-up (8 and 12 months), using postal questionnaires. The ethics committee of Maastricht University approved the study protocol, including the present analysis.
Subjects
Patients were recruited in collaboration with a local occupational health service (OHS) that monitors a working
Characteristics of the study sample
In Table 1, the demographic and clinical variables that were entered in multivariate models are presented. Sixty-six patients (44%) met the research criteria for CFS at baseline. Data were available for 146 patients at 4 months, 143 patients at 8 months and 138 patients at 12 months.
Recovery and CFS-like caseness
Recovered cases and CFS-like caseness among the patients in the course of 12 months are presented in Table 2. After 12 months, 43% of the participants were no longer fatigue cases, and 62% had resumed work. The
Predictors of recovery
We found that a substantial portion of the fatigued employees in our sample did not recover in the course of 12 months, which indicates the advanced level of chronicity and impairment in this group of patients. It is interesting to find that the chances of work resumption plummet dramatically after 4 months. Fifty-five percent of the participants had resumed their work after 4 months, while only an additional 7% resumed work in the following 8 months, if we assume that those who resumed work
Conclusions
Several conclusions can be drawn from the findings in this study. First, recovering from persistent fatigue and going back to work seem to entangle different underlying processes. Consequently, recovering from health complaints and resuming work after a period of sickness absence do not necessarily fall together.
Furthermore, our findings suggest that CFS and persistent fatigue, although different, are no distinct categories but rather stages of a fatigue severity continuum [1] on which people
Acknowledgments
This research project was funded by the Health Research and Development Council (ZorgOnderzoek Nederland), The Netherlands (Grant No. 2830180). The recruitment of patients was made possible by the donation of services by ‘Arbo Unie Limburg’ (Occupational Health Service Limburg).
References (33)
- et al.
Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: psychometrics, prevalence and correlates
J Psychosom Res
(2002) - et al.
Functional somatic syndromes: one or many?
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Predictors of chronic “postviral” fatigue
Lancet
(1994) - et al.
Chronic fatigue: risk factors for symptom persistence in a 2 1/2-year follow-up study
Am J Med
(1995) - et al.
Natural course and predicting self-reported improvement in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with a relatively short illness duration
J Psychosom Res
(2002) - et al.
Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome
J Psychosom Res
(1994) - et al.
The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers
J Epidemiol Community Health
(1992) - et al.
Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress
BMJ
(1994) - et al.
ABC of psychological medicine: fatigue
BMJ
(2002)
ABC of psychological medicine: functional somatic symptoms and syndromes
BMJ
Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work
Occup Environ Med
Fatigue as a predictor of work disability
Occup Environ Med
Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review
JAMA
Efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy by general practitioners for unexplained fatigue among employees: a randomised controlled trial
Br J Psychiatry
The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International chronic fatigue syndrome study group
Ann Intern Med
Cited by (39)
Physical symptom attributions: A defining characteristic of somatoform disorders?
2015, General Hospital PsychiatryWork-related fatigue among medical personnel in Taiwan
2013, Journal of the Formosan Medical AssociationCitation Excerpt :Prevalence has been reported to vary from <10% to >40%.1–5 There is increasing recognition that fatigue is a risk factor for workplace injuries and illness,6–12 with some studies mentioning fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence.2,13,14 The most serious condition among work-related fatigue outcomes is “Karoshi”, which is now considered to be a significant occupational hazard and is recognized as a legislative occupational disease in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.15
Fatigue in primary care: Longitudinal associations with pain
2010, PainCitation Excerpt :Most studies that have been performed on the overlap between pain and fatigue have used cross-sectional data [3,15,22,33,40]. However, in a prospective cohort study among employees, a higher pain score predicted worse fatigue outcome after 1 year [13]. We found a similar association between baseline pain and fatigue outcome among primary care patients [25].
Sleep physiology in recovery from burnout
2009, Biological PsychologyPrognosis of fatigue. A systematic review
2008, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Recovery or improvement in these studies varied from 22% to 55% [12–15,28–30]. Attrition bias was considered unlikely in four studies with the same range of recovery rates [14,28–30]. In both settings, similar differences in study characteristics were apparent between studies reporting lowest and highest recovery rates.
Associations of fatigue and depression among fatigued employees over time: A 4-year follow-up study
2007, Journal of Psychosomatic Research