Predictors of outcome in fatigued employees on sick leave: Results from a randomised trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.03.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The main objective of this study was to identify predictors of fatigue caseness, work resumption and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)-like caseness in a sample of fatigued employees on sick leave.

Methods

For 12 months, 151 fatigued employees on sick leave, 44% of whom met research criteria for CFS at baseline, were followed. Measures included fatigue, health aspects, psychological problems, burnout, causal attributions and self-efficacy. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between predictor variables at baseline and outcome at follow-up.

Results

After 12 months, 43% of the patients were no longer fatigue cases, and 62% had resumed work. Recovery from fatigue caseness was predicted by stronger psychological attributions and other perception-related factors, whereas work resumption was predicted by lower age, male sex, CFS-like caseness and less cognitive difficulties. Lower physical functioning scores were predictive of (the development of) CFS-like caseness.

Conclusion

Recovering from persistent fatigue and work resumption seem to result from different underlying processes and do not necessarily fall together. As many factors associated with outcome in fatigue reflect illness perception, the prevention of persistent fatigue and CFS may partly be achieved by the modification of perception.

Introduction

Fatigue is a common complaint in the general, primary care and working population, with a reported prevalence varying from 7% to 45% [1], [2], [3]. In most cases, fatigue lacks a clear somatic cause [4] and appears to be a functional symptom [5], [6]. Fatigue can best be understood as a continuum, ranging from mild complaints frequently seen in the community to severe, disabling fatigue like chronic fatigue (syndrome; [1]). When fatigue becomes severe and persistent, it may lead to long-term sick leave [7] and work disability [8].

In the present study, we report predictors of outcome in a sample of persistently fatigued employees absent from work on sick leave. To our knowledge, predictors of outcome have never been studied in this particular group of patients. The study sample was originally selected to assess the efficacy of brief cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) by general practitioners in fatigued employees on sick leave. Despite favourable effects of CBT for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in previous studies [9], [10], CBT had no detectable effect on the course and duration of fatigue and absenteeism compared with usual GP care [11]. One explanation for this finding might be that impairment in our sample was too advanced for a short treatment in a primary care setting. At baseline, 44% of the patients already met research criteria for CFS [12].

Previously, we studied the relation between persistent fatigue among employees and CFS and found that the two conditions share many characteristics [13]. Interesting in this context is the potential role of causal attributions. Studies have shown that outcomes in CFS patients are predicted by the extent to which patients attribute their illness to a somatic or psychological cause [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. In a recent study, Chalder et al. [21] found that fatigue caseness and social disability after CBT or counselling were predicted by stronger somatic causal attributions in a sample of fatigued primary care patients, 28% of whom met research criteria for CFS [12].

We examined the role of several factors, among which causal attributions, as predictors of outcome after 1 year. Outcome was defined in terms of (recovery from) fatigue caseness, work resumption and CFS-like caseness (meeting research criteria for CFS) at follow-up. As fatigued employees who meet criteria for CFS may differ from fatigued employees who do not meet CFS criteria in important clinical ways [13], we hypothesized that different predictors of outcome would be found in CFS-like cases and non-CFS cases at baseline.

Section snippets

Design

We conducted a prospective study as part of a randomised controlled trial. Data were collected on four occasions: at baseline and posttreatment assessments (4 months), using computerized questionnaires, and twice at follow-up (8 and 12 months), using postal questionnaires. The ethics committee of Maastricht University approved the study protocol, including the present analysis.

Subjects

Patients were recruited in collaboration with a local occupational health service (OHS) that monitors a working

Characteristics of the study sample

In Table 1, the demographic and clinical variables that were entered in multivariate models are presented. Sixty-six patients (44%) met the research criteria for CFS at baseline. Data were available for 146 patients at 4 months, 143 patients at 8 months and 138 patients at 12 months.

Recovery and CFS-like caseness

Recovered cases and CFS-like caseness among the patients in the course of 12 months are presented in Table 2. After 12 months, 43% of the participants were no longer fatigue cases, and 62% had resumed work. The

Predictors of recovery

We found that a substantial portion of the fatigued employees in our sample did not recover in the course of 12 months, which indicates the advanced level of chronicity and impairment in this group of patients. It is interesting to find that the chances of work resumption plummet dramatically after 4 months. Fifty-five percent of the participants had resumed their work after 4 months, while only an additional 7% resumed work in the following 8 months, if we assume that those who resumed work

Conclusions

Several conclusions can be drawn from the findings in this study. First, recovering from persistent fatigue and going back to work seem to entangle different underlying processes. Consequently, recovering from health complaints and resuming work after a period of sickness absence do not necessarily fall together.

Furthermore, our findings suggest that CFS and persistent fatigue, although different, are no distinct categories but rather stages of a fatigue severity continuum [1] on which people

Acknowledgments

This research project was funded by the Health Research and Development Council (ZorgOnderzoek Nederland), The Netherlands (Grant No. 2830180). The recruitment of patients was made possible by the donation of services by ‘Arbo Unie Limburg’ (Occupational Health Service Limburg).

References (33)

  • R Mayou et al.

    ABC of psychological medicine: functional somatic symptoms and syndromes

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • N Janssen et al.

    Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work

    Occup Environ Med

    (2003)
  • LGPM Amelsvoort van et al.

    Fatigue as a predictor of work disability

    Occup Environ Med

    (2002)
  • P Whiting et al.

    Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • MJH Huibers et al.

    Efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy by general practitioners for unexplained fatigue among employees: a randomised controlled trial

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • K Fukuda et al.

    The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International chronic fatigue syndrome study group

    Ann Intern Med

    (1994)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Work-related fatigue among medical personnel in Taiwan

      2013, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prevalence has been reported to vary from <10% to >40%.1–5 There is increasing recognition that fatigue is a risk factor for workplace injuries and illness,6–12 with some studies mentioning fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence.2,13,14 The most serious condition among work-related fatigue outcomes is “Karoshi”, which is now considered to be a significant occupational hazard and is recognized as a legislative occupational disease in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.15

    • Fatigue in primary care: Longitudinal associations with pain

      2010, Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most studies that have been performed on the overlap between pain and fatigue have used cross-sectional data [3,15,22,33,40]. However, in a prospective cohort study among employees, a higher pain score predicted worse fatigue outcome after 1 year [13]. We found a similar association between baseline pain and fatigue outcome among primary care patients [25].

    • Prognosis of fatigue. A systematic review

      2008, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recovery or improvement in these studies varied from 22% to 55% [12–15,28–30]. Attrition bias was considered unlikely in four studies with the same range of recovery rates [14,28–30]. In both settings, similar differences in study characteristics were apparent between studies reporting lowest and highest recovery rates.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text