Elsevier

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Volume 93, October 2017, Pages 30-36
Journal of Psychiatric Research

Improvement in quality of life and sexual functioning in a comorbid sample after the unified protocol transdiagnostic group treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Patients with multiple mental disorders often experience sexual dysfunction and reduced quality of life. The unified protocol (UP) is a transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders that has the potential to improve quality of life and sexual functioning via improved emotion management. The present study evaluates changes in quality of life and sexual functioning in a highly comorbid sample treated with the UP in a group format. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either a UP active-treatment group or a medication-only control group. Treatment was delivered in 14 sessions over the course of 4 months. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), and quality of life was assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF). Quality of life, anxiety and depression all significantly improved among participants treated with the UP. Some improvement in sexual functioning was also noted. The results support the efficacy of the UP in improving quality of life and sexual functioning in comorbid patients.

Introduction

Comorbidity in mental disorders, in general, affects between 14% and 43% of the population in Brazil (Molina et al., 2014), and 26.2%–40% of the population in the USA (Kessler et al., 2012, Kessler et al., 2005a, Kessler et al., 2005b). In several studies, more than 40% of patients who received one diagnosis also met the diagnostic criteria for a second diagnosis over a 12-month period (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Meng and D'Arcy, 2012, AL-Asadi et al., 2014). Naturally, comorbidity is very common and can have severe consequences for mental health (Molina et al., 2014, Kessler et al., 2005a).

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by excessive and persistent worrying that is hard to control, causes significant distress or impairment and occurs on more days than not for at least six months (Wittchen et al., 1994). Epidemiologic studies of nationally representative samples in the United States have found a lifetime prevalence of GAD of 5.1% (Wittchen et al., 1994) to 11.9% (Kessler et al., 2012, Kessler et al., 2005b, Kessler et al., 2005a). A review of epidemiological studies in Europe found a 12-month prevalence of 1.7–3.4% (Wittchen et al., 2011), and a lifetime prevalence of 4.3–5.9% (Wittchen & Jacobi, 2005).

Evidence suggests that quality of life is a measure of patients’ perceptions that depends on their illnesses and that it should be part of the diagnostic evaluation and treatment plan for patients with depression and GAD (AL-Asadi et al., 2014, Andrade et al., 2012). Comorbid mood and GAD affect between 9.5 and 18.1% of the general Brazilian population and often contribute to a severe reduction in quality of life (Molina et al., 2014).

GAD and depressive disorders lead to a reduced quality of life across several domains (Althof, 2002, Zitman, 2012, Johansson et al., 2012, Maia et al., 2013, Aldao and Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010, Pehlivanidis et al., 2006). We can include physical, psychological, social and environmental wellbeing (Molina et al., 2014, Kessler et al., 2005a, Kessler et al., 2005b), and sexual functioning, as well (Pehlivanidis et al., 2006).

Pehlivanidis et al. (2006) found that sexual dysfunction is reported in approximately 53%–70% of the general population. Studies indicate that patients with comorbidity can report improved measures of quality of life and decreased sexual dysfunction after cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) treatment (Johansson et al., 2012, Maia et al., 2013, Aldao and Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010, Pehlivanidis et al., 2006).

Psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring in transdiagnostic groups helps target related disorders. Systematic desensitization and assertive practice, both incorporated into CBT treatment methods, may help relieve some symptoms of sexual dysfunction (Hoyer et al., 2009, Kelly et al., 2006). Comorbid patients are often more conscious of their emotional disorders than are patients who have only one disorder. These patients typically suffer from a poor quality of life in general and often feel that their disorders impact their social, psychological and physical wellbeing.

A study by Frisch et al. (2005) showed that comorbid patients in a CBT treatment condition reported significantly higher overall levels of quality of life (M = 2.22, SD = 1.52) at post-treatment than individuals in a waitlist condition (M = 0.93, SD = 1.96). The magnitude of the between condition effect size for overall quality of life was large (g = 0.77) and better quality of life may reflect a range of benefits, including enhanced treatment outcomes, long-term resilience, and decreased utilization of other health care resources (Frisch et al., 1992, Frisch et al., 2005, Gallagher et al., 2009, Donohue and Swingen, 1999).

The unified protocol (UP) for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP; Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b) is a recently developed cognitive behavioral treatment method designed to alleviate symptoms associated with a range of emotional disorders (Aldao and Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010). The UP was developed in response to high levels of comorbidity and phenotypic overlap in anxiety, depressive and related disorders, and it targets the temperamental trait of neuroticism, i.e., the tendency to experience frequent and intense negative affect, coupled with a perception of inadequate coping (Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b). The UP's goal is to promote a more accepting, willing attitude toward the experience of strong emotions in order to counter the processes that cause and maintain emotional disorders (Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b).

Barlow et al., 2011b, Barlow et al., 2011a research on the symptoms and dimensions of emotional disorders indicates that there is a hierarchy of affectivity negative/neuroticism and affectivity positive/extroversion. These findings demonstrate that the hyperexcitability of limbic structures and disrupted or limited inhibitory control of cortical structures is evident in people with anxiety and mood disorders.

In preliminary studies, the UP had moderate to large treatment effects on measures of temperamental affectivity, and a strong effect on positive affectivity. Since negative emotional experiences are a product of adaptive learning, an emphasis is placed on reducing affective reactions to negative emotions (Farchione et al., 2012, Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b).

Improving patients' overall quality of life contributes to positive mental health. Quality of life comprises a cognitive component (judging one's overall life satisfaction) and an affective component (reflecting the frequency of positive and negative emotions). Rationally, when people become adapted to their emotions, the positive effects include decreased mental disorders, better interpersonal functioning and functional health behaviors (Gallagher et al., 2013).

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of life and sexual function of twenty-four (24) comorbid patients with unipolar depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) after 14 sessions of UP treatment.

Section snippets

Methodology

Forty-eight patients (48) with unipolar depressive disorder and anxiety disorders were assessed and diagnosed via MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) developed by Sheehan et al. (1998) and adapted for Brazilian population by Amorim (2000). All of the subjects sought psychological and psychiatric treatment at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Of the forty-eight (48) patients, twenty-four (24) received a CBT UP group intervention, and

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test revealed that the data had a normal distribution. Thus, we used the means and standard deviation as measures in this study. Next, descriptive statistics were used as the method for data analysis, which evaluated the means and standard deviations between the 2 groups in this study, the UP intervention group (N = 24) and the control group (N = 24).

A test t was used because it tests whether a mean of a sample with a normal distribution significantly differs

Selection of subjects

Patients from both groups were required to have either unipolar depressive disorder or an anxiety disorder. In this study, 83.3% of the participants had unipolar depressive disorder and 62.5% of the patients had an anxiety disorder. The results were compared to those of the control group of twenty-four (24) patients, 29.2% of whom had a unipolar depressive Disorder and 45.8% of whom had GAD; of the control participants, 67% received anxiolytic medication, 21% received an antidepressant, and 13%

Interventions

The UP was delivered in the 3 active treatment groups over 14 treatment sessions, which were each 2 h in duration. The intervention sessions were adapted from the UP model (Maia et al., 2013, Kraus et al., 2011, Ornelas Maia et al., 2014).

Patient levels of anxiety and depression and their subsequent treatment trajectory were determined by various self-report measures. Social and cultural data, including sex, age, profession, religion, level of education and medications were obtained via

Results

The results of the study are shown in Table 1. Among the 48 patients who had psychiatric disorders as revealed by the MINI Interview, unipolar depressive disorder had a highly significant correlation between the pre- and post-treatment groups (p < 0.001). The change in anxiety from baseline to post-treatment was highly significant (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 2. Average anxiety, according BAI scores, at pre- and post-treatment was 21.5 and 9.0, respectively, for the active group and 19.3 and

Discussion

Due to the high comorbidity rates for anxiety and mood disorders, and especially for generalized anxiety disorder, therapists may be unsure about which treatment option is best for a given patient. Research suggests that the UP treatment protocol increases the chances that patients will be able to better understand and manage emotions and recurring symptoms (Johnston et al., 2011, Gould et al., 1997, Tolin, 2010, Cape et al., 2010, Hunot et al., 2007, Donker et al., 2009, Ejeby et al., 2014).

Conclusion

The unified protocol improved the general quality of life for transdiagnostic patients, which was reflected in the improvement of patients' physical, psychological and social wellbeing. Group therapy enabled these patients to have a greater capacity for social wellness in particular. UP treatment was also shown to improve patients’ sexual performance. All of the patients in the active condition acknowledged feeling progress from the beginning to the end of the treatment, unlike in the control

Author contribution

The contribution of all the authors was for production of the article. Ana Claudia Corrêa de Ornelas Maia and Antonio E. Nardi participated of the research project. Ana Claudia Corrêa de Ornelas Maia; Jenny Sanford; Hannah Boettcher; Antonio E. Nardi and David Barlow reviewed the grammar and the concept about the Unified Protocol intervention in trandiagnostic patients.

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References (47)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Cautionary for forensic use of DSM-5

  • P. Amorim

    Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): validação de entrevista breve para diagnóstico de transtornos mentais

    Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr.

    (2000)
  • L.H. Andrade et al.

    Mental disorders in megacities: findings from the São Paulo megacity mental health survey, Brazil

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • D.H. Barlow et al.

    Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Therapist Guide

    (2011)
  • D.H. Barlow et al.

    Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders

    (2011)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck anxiety inventory manual

    BehavRes Ther.

    (1993)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck Depression Inventory

    (1993)
  • J. Cape et al.

    Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression

    BMC Med.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Cunha

    Manual da versão em português das escalas Beck

    (2001)
  • T. Donker et al.

    Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: a meta-analysis

    BMC Med.

    (2009)
  • W.T. Donohue et al.

    Psychotherapy for male sexual dysfunction: a review

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • K. Ejeby et al.

    Randomized controlled trial of transdiagnostic group treatments for primary care patients with common mental disorders

    Fam. Pract.

    (2014)
  • M.B. Frisch et al.

    Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: a measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment

    Psychol. Assess.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (21)

    • The Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Sexual Function and Satisfaction: A Scoping Review

      2022, Sexual Medicine Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      It stands to reason that particularly ER interventions should be investigated further, which have already shown promise in the treatment of the mental health comorbidities associated with sexual dysfunctions.15, 59, 66 To date, and despite the few randomized controlled trials of ER interventions for sexual health, studies like the de Ornelas Maia45 show promising results for the use of trans-diagnostic approaches, for instance the Unified Protocol, which encompasses psychoeducational components of emotions as well as strategies to cope with them. In addition, a recent systematic review on mindfulness meditation-based interventions for sexual dysfunctions67 suggests positive effects, despite methodological weaknesses of the studies included in the review (eg, patient selection, small sample sizes, complex interventions and lack of homework assessment.

    • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Unified Protocol as a transdiagnostic emotion regulation based intervention

      2019, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Beyond psychopathology, the UP is also assumed to lead to improvements in overall functioning and quality of life (Ellard et al., 2010). The UP currently has empirical support across a range of internalising clinical presentations, including depression (Boswell, Anderson, & Barlow, 2014), anxiety disorders (Farchione et al., 2012), chronic pain (Allen, Tsao, Seidman, Ehrenreich-May, & Zeltzer, 2012), borderline personality disorder (Lopez et al., 2015), as well as across a range of anxiety based comorbidities (de Ornelas Maia, Sanford, Boettcher, Nardi, & Barlow, 2017; Hague, Scott, & Kellett, 2015; Laposa, Mancuso, Abraham, & Loli-Dano, 2017; Reinholt et al., 2017; Sauer-Zavala, Bentley, & Wilner, 2016) and is perhaps the most researched, accessible and established of the various transdiagnostic approaches. While other transdiagnostic treatment approaches have also been developed, these other approaches have for the most part been restricted to the domain of anxiety disorders (e.g., Norton, 2006; Schmidt et al., 2012) or are yet to attain the substantial transdiagnostic evidence base of the UP (e.g., Gros, 2014) and no other transdiagnostic approach places such central importance on difficulties in emotion regulation as a driver of psychopathology.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text