Elsevier

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Volume 80, September 2016, Pages 52-58
Journal of Psychiatric Research

The risk of offspring developing substance use disorders when exposed to one versus two parent(s) with alcohol use disorder: A nationwide, register-based cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

Few population-based, family studies have examined associations between exposure to one vs. two parent(s) with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and the risk of offspring developing substance use disorder (SUD). Moreover, these studies have focused solely on the development of AUD, and not SUD, in offspring. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether exposure to one vs. two parent(s) with AUD increases the risk of offspring developing SUD.

Methods

A population-based, cohort study was conducted in which offspring born in Denmark between 1983 and 1989 were followed through national registries until 2011. Register-based data were obtained from the: Psychiatric Central Research Register, National Patient Registry, Civil Registration System, Fertility Database, and Cause of Death Register. Adjusted hazard ratios were calculated using multivariate Cox-regression models.

Findings

A total of 398,881 offspring were included in this study. Of these, 3.9% had at least one parent with AUD. Parental AUD was significantly associated with the development of SUD in offspring. Having one parent with AUD was linked to a 1.44-fold increased risk (95% CL, 1.29–1.61), while having two parents with AUD was linked to a 2.29-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.64–3.20). No significant differences were found in relation to either parental or offspring gender.

Conclusions

Exposure to parental AUD is linked to an increased risk of offspring developing SUD. This risk is additive for offspring exposed to double parental AUD. The findings have important implications for clinical assessment and intervention strategies, as well as the management of offspring exposed to parental AUD.

Introduction

Alcohol use disorders (AUD) are a serious and widespread public health problem in Europe. The mean prevalence of AUD in the general population is 7.5%, although large variations across countries have been noted (WHO, 2014). In Denmark, approximately 17% of the adult population is believed to have AUD (Hansen et al., 2011). As a consequence, the risk of growing up in a family where one or even two parent(s) suffer from AUD is elevated.

Parental AUD tends to aggregate in families, and may be transmitted to offspring through genetic and environmental influences (McGue, 1994, Merikangas, 1990, Verhulst et al., 2015). Both twin and adoption studies show that AUD has a heritability rate of 50% and that general environmental effects exert a modest influence (Verhulst et al., 2015). Despite this apparently modest environmental effect, there is evidence to suggest that direct exposure to alcoholic environments through parents (e.g. parental modeling of drinking, alcohol-specific parenting style) may represent a major risk factor for the development of AUD in offspring (Christoffersen and Soothill, 2003, Finan et al., 2015, Handley and Chassin, 2013, Hawkins et al., 1992, Latendresse et al., 2008, Stone et al., 2012). In addition to the twin- and adoption studies, as well as studies on specific environmental risk factors, several family studies report that offspring exposed to parental AUD are at risk of developing AUD, as well as other SUD’s (Christoffersen and Soothill, 2003, Hill et al., 2011, Marmorstein et al., 2009, Merikangas et al., 1998, Nurnberger et al., 2004, Sørensen et al., 2011). Hence, one would expect that exposure to double parental AUD should result in an additive effect of influences that further increase the risk of offspring developing addictive behaviour. However, little attention has been devoted to examining the specific associations between exposure to single vs. double parental AUD and the risk of offspring developing AUD. Furthermore, the few family studies found in this area focused solely on the transmission of AUD (Lieb et al., 2002, Yoon et al., 2013), and not SUD, which comprises several addictive disorders. Addictive disorders do not necessarily manifest themselves through the same drug of choice in offspring as they do in parents (Hill et al., 2011, Kendler et al., 2003, Krueger et al., 2002, Nurnberger et al., 2004, Tsuang et al., 2001, Young et al., 2006), whereby an extended association between parental AUD and SUD in offspring is possible. Indeed, AUD-AUD studies illustrate that offspring have an additive risk of developing AUD when exposed to either single or double parental AUD (Lieb et al., 2002, Yoon et al., 2013).

In considering the available evidence, we hypothesized that the number of AUD parents (one vs. two parents) is predictive of whether offspring have an additive risk of developing SUD. Given that SUD comprises several addictive disorders, and thus constitutes a broader outcome measure than AUD, we expect offspring to have an even greater additive risk of developing SUD.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether exposure to one vs. two parent(s) with AUD is associated with an increased risk of SUD developing in offspring.

Section snippets

Data and subjects

Danish national registries offer unique opportunities for researchers to conduct population-based studies on the effects of various exposures. The authors performed a cohort study using Danish, collected, longitudinal register data from the: Psychiatric Central Research Register (covering psychiatric hospitalisations) (Mors et al., 2011), Danish National Patient Registry (covering somatic hospitalisations) (Lynge et al., 2011), Fertility database (Blenstrup and Knudsen, 2011), Cause of Death

Descriptive analyses

As shown in Table 1, 398,881 offspring were included in the study. The cohort included 204,743 males and 194,138 females born between 1983 and 1989. Offspring were followed for an average of 23.89 years (SD = 5.08 years) until 2011. A total of 15,565 (3.9%) offspring were exposed to parental AUD.

SUD was diagnosed in 5019 (1.3%) adolescents and young adults. SUD’s were diagnosed approximately twice as often in offspring exposed to parental AUD, and AUD comprised one third of SUD diagnoses in

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the association between exposure to parental AUD and the risk of offspring developing SUD. We found that offspring exposed to single parental AUD had a 1.44-fold increased risk of developing SUD compared to non-exposed offspring. Offspring exposed to double parental AUD had an even higher risk of developing SUD. In this case, the increased risk was 2.29-fold. We found no differences in risk relating to either parental or offspring

Conclusion

Offspring exposed to parental AUD were found to have a higher risk of developing SUD compared to non-exposed offspring. An additive risk for developing SUD was found in offspring exposed to double parental AUD. Moreover, our findings revealed no specific risks relating to either parental or offspring gender.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article. The paper has not been submitted elsewhere.

Authors’ contributions

Mellentin, AI: drafted the article, participated in the data analysis and interpretation of data, and approved the final version.

Brink, M: participated in drafting of the article and in the data analysis and interpretation of data, and approved the final version.

Andersen, L: participated in drafting of the article and in the data analysis and interpretation of data, and approved the final version.

Erlangsen, A: participated in drafting of the article, data analysis and interpretation of data and

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Lotte Skøt for assistance with the proof reading of this article.

References (42)

  • K. Chen et al.

    The natural history of drug use from adolescence to the mid-thirties in a general population sample

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1995)
  • A.I. Christensen et al.

    The danish national health survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics

    Scand. J. Public Health

    (2012)
  • B.F. Grant et al.

    The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV Version

    (2001)
  • E.D. Handley et al.

    Alcohol-specific parenting as a mechanism of parental drinking and alcohol use disorder risk on adolescent alcohol use onset

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2013)
  • A.B.G. Hansen et al.

    The number of persons with alcohol problems in the Danish population

    Scand. J. Public Health

    (2011)
  • J.D. Hawkins et al.

    Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1992)
  • K. Helweg-Larsen

    The Danish register of causes of death

    Scand. J. Public Health

    (2011)
  • K.S. Kendler et al.

    The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • R.F. Krueger et al.

    Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum

    J. Abnorm Psychol.

    (2002)
  • S.J. Latendresse et al.

    Parenting mechanisms in links between parents’ and adolescents’ alcohol use behaviors

    Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2008)
  • M.B. Lauritsen et al.

    Validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: findings from a cohort sample born 1990–1999

    J. Autism Dev. Disord.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Family History of Alcohol Use Disorder as a Predictor of Endogenous Pain Modulation Among Moderate to Heavy Drinkers

      2022, Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, the exploratory subgroup analyses included participants with histories of AUD in both parents, being classified as PH+ and MH+. Given the differential risks associated with history of AUD in one vs. two parents,46,60 the sample stratification strategy used makes it difficult to fully disentangle parental contributions. Participants with histories of AUD in both parents were retained in the exploratory analyses to conserve cell sizes; however, it should also be noted that the MANCOVA comparing MH+ and FH- participants was likely underpowered (MH+: n = 20; FH-: n = 166), increasing the likelihood of a false-negative finding.8

    • Altered excitatory transmission in striatal neurons after chronic ethanol consumption in selectively bred crossed high alcohol-preferring mice

      2021, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, a history of AUD in first-degree relatives confers greater risk to develop disordered drinking (Walters, 2002; Agrawal and Lynskey, 2008). Interestingly, the risk of offspring developing AUD significantly increases if the disorder is present in both parents (Mellentin et al., 2016; Yoon et al., 2013). Similarly, multigenerational family history of AUD is highly associated with more severe recurrence of alcohol misuse (Moss et al., 2007).

    • The number of biological parents with alcohol use disorder histories and risk to offspring through age 30

      2020, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a prospectively assessed community-based sample, for example, the number of parents with AUD predicted the progression from occasional to regular alcohol use in offspring but was not associated with an increased risk for offspring AUD by age 17 (Lieb et al., 2002). In contrast, population-based research has indicated that offspring who lived with a parent during an AUD episode had a higher risk of developing a substance use disorder compared to non-exposed offspring, and that risk was greatest when offspring were directly exposed to two parents with AUD (Mellentin et al., 2016). The limited literature on the number of parents with AUD has focused primarily on offspring risk for hazardous alcohol use in general and not on specific AUD course-related features demonstrated over time.

    • Substance abuse in parents and subsequent risk of offspring psychiatric morbidity in late adolescence and early adulthood: A longitudinal analysis of siblings and their parents

      2018, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, several commentators have stressed the need for more studies using population-based family data, as most of the existing evidence is based on student, clinical, and high-risk community samples of lesser generalizability (Park and Schepp, 2015; Mellentin et al., 2016; Christoffersen and Soothill, 2003). It has also been pointed out that many of the previous studies assessing health consequences of parental substance abuse still focus either on short-term effects or more general measures of lifetime exposures, and much less is known about timing or accumulation of exposure to parental substance abuse at different stages of childhood (Björkenstam et al., 2016; Park and Schepp, 2015; Mellentin et al., 2016). Life-course theory posits that the effect of childhood experiences on later health may depend on the timing of events (Ben-Shlomo and Kuh, 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text