Behavioral effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.07.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Treatments have failed to successfully manage drug addiction.

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to reduce craving in drug addicts.

  • Repeated anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC seems to improve executive functions in alcoholics.

  • Repeated anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC reduced depressive symptoms and craving in alcoholics.

  • However, repeated anodal tDCS induced greater readiness for relapsing to the use of alcohol.

Abstract

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to reduce acute substance craving in drug addicts, and improve cognition in neuropsychiatric patients. Here we aimed to explore further tDCS induced behavioral and neurophysiological modulation including assessment of relapse rate over a prolonged time course in alcoholism. We examined the effects of repeated anodal tDCS (2 mA, 35 cm2, 20 min) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on relapse to the use of alcohol in alcoholics from outpatient services, who received additional routine clinical treatment. Furthermore, event related potentials (ERPs), cognitive and frontal executive processes, craving, depressive and anxiety symptoms were obtained before and after treatment. From thirteen alcoholic subjects, seven were randomized to sham-tDCS and six to real tDCS treatment (once a week for five consecutive weeks). Depressive symptoms and craving were reduced to a larger extent in the tDCS group compared to the sham group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.015, respectively). On the other hand, active tDCS was able to block the increase in neural activation triggered by alcohol related and neutral cues in prefrontal cortex (PFC) as indexed by ERP as seen in the sham-tDCS group. Finally, there was a trend for increased change in executive function in the tDCS group compared to the sham-tDCS group (p = 0.082), and, similarly, a trend for more relapses in the tDCS group compared to sham tDCS (four alcoholic subjects (66.7%) vs. one (14.3%), p = 0.053).These results confirm the previous findings of tDCS effects on craving in alcoholism and also extend these findings as we showed also tDCS-related mood improvement. However, potential increase in relapse is possible; thus the clinical value of an increase in craving and improvement in depression and executive function needs to be carefully assessed in further studies; including investigation of optimal parameters of stimulation.

Introduction

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a method of noninvasive brain stimulation that modulates neuronal resting membrane potentials, leading to changes of cortical excitability, and activity, which can outlast the stimulation for hours. Cathodal current decreases cortical excitability, and anodal current increases it (Nitsche et al., 2002, Nitsche and Paulus, 2000, Nitsche and Paulus, 2001, Wassermann and Grafman, 2005). Beyond its physiological effects, tDCS has been shown to have an impact on cognition and behavior (Nitsche et al., 2003a, Nitsche et al., 2003b, Nitsche et al., 2008). For patients suffering from neuropsychiatric diseases, the potential benefit of neuromodulation induced by tDCS has been increasingly investigated in depression (Bikson et al., 2008, Boggio et al., 2008a, Fregni et al., 2006a, Fregni et al., 2006b, Nitsche, 2002), substance abuse and craving including alcohol (Boggio et al., 2008b, Nakamura-Palacios et al., 2012), tobacco (Fregni et al., 2008a), marijuana (Boggio et al., 2010) and also foods disorders (Fregni et al., 2008b). In these studies, tDCS of the prefrontal cortex was demonstrated to reduce acute craving in substance abuse.

Although pharmacologic treatments with naltrexone, topiramate and acamprosate for alcohol dependence in primary care and specialty medical setting alone and in combination with brief or more extensive psychosocial therapies are available, these have often only modest or even controversial effects (Assanangkornchai and Srisurapanont, 2007, Miller et al., 2011). Thus, better or adjuvant approaches that may enhance or facilitate the treatment of alcohol dependence remain highly required.

Drug dependence is known to be associated with structural and functional damage of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) culminating in a general reduction of frontal activity (Fein et al., 2002, Franklin et al., 2002, Goldstein and Volkow, 2002). Moreover, the PFC is critically involved in craving for smoking (McBride et al., 2006, Wilson et al., 2004) and drugs such as alcohol (Tapert et al., 2003); opiates (Sell et al., 2000) and cocaine (Garavan et al., 2000, Grant et al., 1996). Specifically, craving is associated with enhanced activity of this cortical area during drug cue presentation. Since the PFC is related to executive functions and to the brain’s reward circuitry (Desposito et al., 1995, Fuster, 2000, Hyman et al., 2006), this imbalance of general and drug cue-related prefrontal activation indicates that the cognitive ability to regulate drug-seeking behavior is decreased in substance addicts. Reducing craving and improving cognitive functions constitute great challenges in the treatment of drug addiction and, unfortunately, pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have not fully addressed these issues so far.

The potential use of tDCS in the clinical treatment of drug addiction has not been studied yet systematically. Since excitability-enhancing anodal tDCS has been shown to improve numerous cognitive processes (Boggio et al., 2006, Dockery et al., 2009, Fertonani et al., 2010, Fiori et al., 2011, Fregni et al., 2005, Jeon and Han, 2012, Jo et al., 2009, Kuo and Nitsche, 2012, Marshall et al., 2004), and diminished cognitive control in drug addicts might be related to prefrontal hypo-activity, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) would enhance executive function, providing improved cognitive control, and thus reduce the probability of relapse to drug use.

We investigated the effects of anodal tDCS applied repeatedly to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on relapse probability to the use of alcohol in addicted subjects from outpatient services in a randomized clinical trial. Event related potentials (ERPs), cognitive and frontal executive functions, and depressive and anxiety symptoms before and after the treatment were also examined.

Section snippets

Subjects

Between June 2011 and May 2012, 13 of 19 (68%) Lesch’s type IV alcohol-dependent patients meeting our inclusion criteria (see below) agreed to participate in this study and successfully completed it. They were referred to us from a specialized outpatient public service of the Medical School Hospital of the Federal University of Espírito Santo (Brazil) for alcohol dependence treatment. Six patients were not included either because they never contacted our laboratory or because they terminated

General clinical outcomes

General socio-demographic features, patterns of drug use and clinical outcomes are presented in Table 1.

Alcoholic subjects were in average 49 years old in the total sample. They were generally (53.8%) low educated (less than 4 years of education) with only one (7.7%) subject with college degree, most of them were unemployed (46.2%) or working in informal jobs (30.8%) and in stable marital state (61.5%) (Table 1). They started to consume alcohol very early in life with the age at onset of in

Discussion

In this study, we observed that alcoholics type IV classified according to Lesch’s typology (Lesch et al., 1988, Lesch et al., 1990) submitted to one weekly application of anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC for five consecutive weeks tended to improve the gain of frontal function. Moreover, tDCS reduced significantly depressive symptoms and craving scores at the end of the treatment, although there was a trend for relapse to the use of alcohol during the five-week treatment. One potential

Conclusion

In alcoholic subjects, anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC reduced depressive symptoms and craving and tended to ameliorate executive functions by the end of the five-week treatment when compared to sham-tDCS, but at the expenses of a greater readiness for relapsing to the use of alcohol during the treatment. In general, changes on current density in PFC areas were largely increased in alcoholics from the sham-tDCS group and changed much less in alcoholics from the real tDCS group by the end of the

Acknowledgments

We want to thank patients and families who agreed to participate in this study, Dr. Maria da Penha Zago-Gomes and Dr. Janine Andrade Moscon for recruiting and referring alcoholic patients, Dr. Roney Welinton Dias de Oliveira for clinical examination of alcoholic patients and graduating students who helped to collect part of the data. MCS, JAM and CLC were recipients of governmental (CNPq or CAPES) student fellowships.

References (92)

  • A. Fertonani et al.

    Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2010)
  • T.R. Franklin et al.

    Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients

    Biol. Psychiatr.

    (2002)
  • F. Fregni et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates the desire for specific foods

    Appetite

    (2008)
  • P.C. Gandiga et al.

    Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2006)
  • A.H. Javadi et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory

    Brain Stimul.

    (2012)
  • D. Keeser et al.

    Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • T.Z. Kincses et al.

    Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • O.M. Lesch et al.

    The course of alcoholism. Long-term prognosis in different types

    Forensic Sci. Int.

    (1988)
  • O. Meiron et al.

    Unilateral prefrontal direct current stimulation effects are modulated by working memory load and gender

    Brain Stimul.

    (2013)
  • K. Monte-Silva et al.

    Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation

    Brain Stimul.

    (2013)
  • P.G. Mulquiney et al.

    Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2011)
  • H.J. Navarro et al.

    Measuring costs of alcohol harm to others: a review of the literature

    Drug Alcohol Depen.

    (2011)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation–technical, safety and functional aspects

    Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008

    Brain Stimul.

    (2008)
  • A.K. Pandey et al.

    Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2012)
  • R.D. Pascual-Marqui et al.

    Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia

    Psychiatr. Res. – Neuroim.

    (1999)
  • L.A. Sell et al.

    Neural responses associated with cue evoked emotional states and heroin in opiate addicts

    Drug Alcohol Depen.

    (2000)
  • E.M. Wassermann et al.

    Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2005)
  • L. Wolkenstein et al.

    Amelioration of cognitive control in depression by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Biol. Psychiatr.

    (2013)
  • S. Assanangkornchai et al.

    The treatment of alcohol dependence

    Curr. Opin. Psychiatr.

    (2007)
  • Barbey, A.K., Koenigs, M., Grafman, J., 2012. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex,...
  • R. Beato et al.

    Frontal assessment battery in a Brazilian sample of healthy controls: normative data

    Arq. Neuropsiquiatr.

    (2012)
  • M. Bikson et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: a general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage

    Curr. Treat. Options Neurol.

    (2008)
  • P.S. Boggio et al.

    A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression

    Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. / Off. Sci. J. Collegium Int. Neuropsychopharmacol.

    (2008)
  • M.J. Bohn et al.

    Development and initial validation of a measure of drinking urges in abstinent alcoholics

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (1995)
  • M.J. Bohn et al.

    Psychometric properties and validity of the obsessive-compulsive drinking scale

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (1996)
  • Brunoni, A.R., Ferrucci, R., Bortolomasi, M., Scelzo, E., Boggio, P.S., Fregni, F., Dell’osso, B., Giacopuzzi, M.,...
  • R.M. Crum et al.

    Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level

    JAMA

    (1993)
  • W.A. de Wildt et al.

    Investigating the structure of craving using structural equation modeling in analysis of the obsessive-compulsive drinking scale: a multinational study

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Desposito et al.

    The neural basis of the central executive system of working-memory

    Nature

    (1995)
  • C.A. Dockery et al.

    Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation

    J. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • D.C. Drummond et al.

    Alcohol urges in alcohol-dependent drinkers: further validation of the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire in an untreated community clinical population

    Addiction (Abingdon, England)

    (2002)
  • B. Dubois et al.

    The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • S. Fecteau et al.

    Neuromodulation of decision-making in the addictive brain

    Subst Use Misuse

    (2010)
  • G. Fein et al.

    Visual P300s in long-term abstinent chronic alcoholics

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2006)
  • V. Fiori et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects

    J. Cognitive Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (142)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Clinical trial registration details: This article presents partial results from a trial approved by the Brazilian Institutional Review Board of the Federal University of Espírito Santo (registrations 017/09) and registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System under identifier NCT01330394.

    View full text