Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 211, August 2019, Pages 185-192.e1
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original Article
The Autism Managing Eating Aversions and Limited Variety Plan vs Parent Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.046Get rights and content

Objective

To assess the feasibility and initial efficacy of a structured parent training program for children with autism spectrum disorder and moderate food selectivity.

Study design

This 16-week randomized trial compared the Managing Eating Aversions and Limited variety (MEAL) Plan with parent education. MEAL Plan (10 core and 3 booster sessions) provided parents with nutrition education and strategies to structure meals and expand the child's diet. Parent education (10 sessions) provided information about autism without guidance on nutrition, meal structure, or diet. In addition to feasibility outcomes, primary efficacy outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale and the Brief Autism Mealtime Behaviors Inventory. Grams consumed during a meal observation served as a secondary outcome.

Results

There were 38 eligible children (19 per group, 32 males). For MEAL Plan, attrition was <10% and attendance >80%. Therapists achieved >90% fidelity. At week 16, positive response rates on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale were 47.4% for the MEAL Plan and 5.3% for parent education (P < .05). The adjusted mean difference (SE) on Brief Autism Mealtime Behaviors Inventory at week 16 was 7.04 (2.71) points (P = .01) in favor of MEAL Plan. For grams consumed, the adjusted standard mean difference (SE) was 30.76 (6.75), also in favor of MEAL Plan (P = .001).

Conclusions

The MEAL Plan seems to be feasible, and preliminary efficacy results are encouraging. If further study replicates these results, the MEAL Plan could expand treatment options for children with autism spectrum disorder and moderate food selectivity.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02712281.

Section snippets

Methods

Children were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the Managing Eating Aversions and Limited variety (MEAL) Plan or the structured parent education program (PEP)17 for 16 weeks. At week 16, parents of children randomly assigned to PEP were invited to participate in the MEAL Plan. Parents of children randomly assigned to MEAL Plan were asked to return at week 20 for a post-treatment follow-up. The study treatments were delivered in a group format. To ensure consistent baseline measurements across

Results

Enrollment began in January 2017 and ended in October 2017. Of the 111 children screened, 50 were ineligible; parents of 23 presumably eligible children declined participation (Figure 1; available at www.jpeds.com); 38 children were randomly assigned to 16 weeks of MEAL Plan or PEP. Participants (32 boys, 6 girls) ranged in age from 38 to 88 months (mean, 58.7 ± 13.8 months). The study groups appeared similar at baseline except for body mass index weight category status (Table II).

Discussion

This study tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Autism MEAL Plan vs parent education (an active comparator) in 38 children with ASD and moderate food selectivity. Feasibility metrics indicated the MEAL Plan curriculum was acceptable to parents. Nearly two thirds of apparently eligible participants actually enrolled in the group-based randomized trial. Attrition was <20%. We successfully collected 88% of study data. Parents in the MEAL Plan group expressed high satisfaction

References (31)

  • C. Curtin et al.

    Food selectivity, mealtime behavior problems, spousal stress, and family food choices in children with and without autism spectrum disorder

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2015)
  • G. Nadon et al.

    Mealtime problems in children with autism spectrum disorder and their typically developing siblings: a comparison study

    Autism

    (2011)
  • C.T. Lukens et al.

    Development and validation of an inventory to assess mealtime behavior problems in children with autism

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2008)
  • W.G. Sharp et al.

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of intensive multidisciplinary intervention for pediatric feeding disorders: how standard is the standard of care?

    J Pediatr

    (2017)
  • W.G. Sharp et al.

    A retrospective chart review of dietary diversity and feeding behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder before and after admission to a day treatment program

    Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl

    (2011)
  • Cited by (38)

    • A nutrition education intervention to improve eating behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorder: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

      2022, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Feeding clinics are available for children who are clinically diagnosed with feeding disorders (e.g., avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, ARFID) or severe food selectivity. However, there is a lack of available programs that address mealtime behaviors and healthy eating for children with ASD who have mild to moderate food selectivity or nutritional issues [12,13]. One of the few interventions is the Autism MEAL Plan, which is a parent training program for caregivers with a three- to eight-year-old child with ASD and moderate food selectivity and showed promising results in improving mealtime behaviors and quantity of food consumed by participants [11,12].

    • The presence of a neurodiverse disorder is associated with increased use of antegrade enema therapy in children with severe constipation: A study from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC)

      2022, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Antegrade therapies (Malone Appendicostomy, Chait tube, MiniACE®, etc.) have often been utilized as the final step in the treatment algorithm given the need for surgical intervention and possible increased morbidity [7,8]. However, it has been observed that many children with neurodiverse disorders have food biases, resistance to medical therapy, and may be anally defensive [8–10]. These behaviors create notable challenges to providers when attempting laxative and/or retrograde enema therapy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development by grants to Emory University (MH081148; principal investigator: W.S.; Marcus Foundation and Children Health Care Trust). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    View full text