OBSTETRICS
Cannabis Abuse or Dependence During Pregnancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study on 12 Million Births

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug during pregnancy in the United States. This study aimed to describe the rate of cannabis dependence or abuse use during pregnancy and its effect on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective population-based cohort of births in the United States between 1999 and 2013 was created using data from the National Inpatient Sample. Births to mothers who reported cannabis dependence or abuse were identified using ICD-9 codes, and the effect on various obstetrical and neonatal outcomes was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for relevant confounders (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

Results

A total of 12 578 557 births were included in our analysis. The incidence of cannabis abuse or dependence rose from 3.22 in 1000 births in 1999 to 8.55 in 1000 births in 2013 (P < 0.0001). Women reporting cannabis dependence or abuse were more likely to have a preterm premature rupture of membranes (odds ratio [OR] 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–1.58), a hospital stay of >7 days (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.11–1.23), and an intrauterine fetal demise (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.39–1.62). Neonates born to exposed mothers had a higher risk of prematurity (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.36–1.43) and growth restriction (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.30–1.41).

Conclusion

Cannabis use during pregnancy steadily increased over the study period. Users of cannabis during gestation were more likely to have adverse outcomes during delivery and require longer periods of hospitalization. Neonates born to exposed mothers were more likely to be born preterm and underweight.

Résumé

Objectif

Aux États-Unis, le cannabis est la drogue à usage récréatif la plus fréquemment consommée pendant la grossesse. Cette étude avait pour buts de calculer le taux de femmes enceintes ayant une dépendance au cannabis ou abusant de celui-ci et de présenter l’incidence du cannabis sur les issues obstétricales et néonatales.

Méthodologie

Une étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur la population et portant sur les naissances survenues aux États-Unis entre 1999 et 2013 a été menée au moyen de données issues du National Inpatient Sample. Les naissances issues de mères ayant déclaré être dépendantes aux cannabis ou avoir abusé de celui-ci ont été codées selon la CIM-9, et les effets du cannabis sur les diverses issues obstétricales et néonatales ont été évalués au moyen de régressions logistiques tenant compte des facteurs de confusion potentiels (classification II-2 du Groupe d’étude canadien).

Résultats

Au total, 12 578 557 naissances ont été retenues pour l’analyse. L’incidence de la dépendance au cannabis ou de l’abus de celui-ci est passée de 3,22 par 1 000 naissances en 1999 à 8,55 par 1 000 naissances en 2013 (P < 0,0001). Les femmes dépendantes au cannabis ou ayant abusé de celui-ci étaient plus susceptibles de vivre une rupture prématurée des membranes (RC : 1,46; IC à 95 % : 1,35–1,58), d’être hospitalisées plus de sept jours (RC : 1,17; IC à 95 % : 1,11–1,23) et de présenter un décès fœtal intra-utérin (RC : 1,50; IC à 95 % : 1,39–1,62). Les nouveau-nés de mères exposées au cannabis couraient un risque accru de naissance prématurée (RC : 1,40; IC à 95 % : 1,36–1,43) et de retard de croissance (RC : 1,35; IC à 95 % : 1,30–1,41).

Conclusion

La consommation de cannabis pendant la grossesse a augmenté de façon constante au cours de la période à l’étude. Les femmes enceintes qui en consommaient couraient un risque accru d’hospitalisation prolongée et d’issues indésirables à l’accouchement. Les nouveau-nés de mères exposées au cannabis étaient plus susceptibles de naître prématurément et de présenter un poids insuffisant.

Section snippets

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis sativa, colloquially known as cannabis or marijuana, is the most commonly used illicit substance in the United States and Canada. Its use has noticeably increased in the last two decades. For example, the 2014 version of the National Survey of Drug Use and Health estimated that 8.4% of the U.S. population were current users of the drug, a finding reflecting an important increase from the 2002 survey, which reported a use prevalence of 6.2%.1 The use of cannabis is expected to become

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest publicly available database of hospital admissions in the United States. Under the management of the Health Care Utilization Project, the NIS aggregates sociodemographic, resource utilization, and clinical-level information for approximately 7 million hospital admissions in 44 participating states annually, representing over 20% of the admissions to community hospitals nationwide.7 Information is

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 12 578 557 women who were delivered between 1999 and 2013, of whom 66 925 were identified as having reported cannabis dependence or abuse. The overall prevalence of cannabis dependence or abuse was 5.32 per 1000 births over the study period. Annual prevalence estimates are displayed in Figure 1. The prevalence of cannabis dependence or abuse in delivering mothers nearly tripled from 3.22 in 1000 deliveries in 1999 to 8.5 in 1000 deliveries in 2013. Prevalence estimates

DISCUSSION

Cannabis use in pregnant women is a growing public health concern, as population-level data have shown that its use has increased significantly in recent decades. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discourage cannabis use during gestation, yet previous cohort studies have estimated that 3.3% to 20.5% of pregnant women have used the substance over the course of their pregnancy.1,8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Although the use of

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of the use of cannabis during pregnancy is increasing, thus highlighting the importance of understanding its effects in gestating women. Our study demonstrates that maternal cannabis use is associated with important adverse outcomes for both the mother and the neonate. Importantly, mothers with a history of cannabis use during pregnancy were more likely to be hospitalized for longer periods of time following parturition, and their neonates were more likely to be born preterm and

REFERENCES (35)

  • PA Fried

    The Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS): methodological issues and findings–it's easy to throw the baby out with the bath water

    Life Sci

    (1995)
  • Behavioral health trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health

    (2015)
  • A Porath-Waller

    Clearing the smoke on cannabis maternal cannabis use during pregnancy – an update

    (2015)
  • Committee opinion no. 637: marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2015)
  • A Ordean et al.

    No. 349-substance use in pregnancy

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can

    (2017)
  • JY Ko et al.

    Prevalence and patterns of marijuana use among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2015)
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Overview of the State Inpatient Databases (SID)

    (2006)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Cannabis-related diagnosis in pregnancy and adverse maternal and infant outcomes

      2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the differences in exposure assessment (clinician diagnosis, self-report via surveys, molecular testing), it is challenging to directly compare our findings to previous studies. A study of births in the National Inpatient Sample in the United States between 1999–2013 is likely the most directly comparable (Petrangelo et al., 2019). ICD9 codes were used to identify CRD, which rose from 3.2 to 8.5 per 1000 births over the study period.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest. Each author has indicated that they meet the journal's requirements for authorship.

    View full text